IIFT EXAM 2020 PAPER ANALYSIS
NATIONAL LEVEL ONLINE TEST
TheIIFT 2018 exam successfully concluded on December 3, 2018. The exam was held for offering admission to MBA programme in International Business. The round 1 of IIFT 2018 Selection Procedure is the written test conducted by Indian Institute Foreign Trade. The candidates who willclear the round 1 of the exam will be called for round 2 ofIIFT Selection procedure which includes Essay writing, Group Discussion and Personal Interview.
|IIFT Eligibility||IIFT Exam Dates||IIFT Application Process||IIFT Exam Centers|
The variation in IIFT Exam Pattern of IIFT mostly takes place at the level of number of questions and the number of sections that are set in the IIFT question paper. Candidates are advised to go through IIFT Paper Analysis in order to gain a comprehensive understanding of content quality, difficulty level and variation in the paper pattern that is expected.
The IIFT 2018 exam is expected to have questions from the following sections - LR (Logical Reasoning), EC (English comprehension), Quantitative analysis and General Awareness and Current Affairs. The total number of questions is usually between 120 and 150. The marks allotted to these questions also vary with the year. The change in exam pattern of IIFT entrance test was introduced from 2009 onwards.
The IIFT 2015 exam was relatively easy by most experts and students who had appeared for the exam. Since, the IIFT 2015 exam was low on difficulty level so the IIFT 2015 cut off was higher than IIFT 2014 exam. IIFT cut off has always been on a lower side but for the year 2015, it was relatively higher.
The IIFT 2015 Quantitative Aptitude section was quite lengthy. There were multiple questions on Arithmetic (10 out of 22). The logical reasoning section for IIFT 2016 exam was very easy. The candidates could easily comprehend the data given and reach the expected answer easily. The Data Interpretation section required candidates to apply their analytical ability to solve the questions. This section had errors in data which confused the candidates. The chances to find the correct answer with the data given were relatively low. There were 24 questions in the General Awareness section.
In total, there were 124 questions distributed among the 4 sections. The total time allotted was 2 hours. The candidates were required to divide the time wisely to attempt all the sections.
|Section||Subject||Questions||Marks per ques.||Total marks|
|Section 1||Quantitative ability||22||1||22|
|Section 2||Part 1 – Analytical and Logical reasoning||20||0.75||15|
|Part 2 – Data interpretation||18||1||18|
|Section 3||Part 1 – Reading comprehension||16||1||16|
|Part 2 – Verbal ability||20||0.75||15|
|Section 4||General awareness||28||0.5||14|
Section analysis IIFT 2015 exam: The question paper had 4 major sections in IIFT 2015 exam. The names of the sections are following:
1. Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension
The sectional cut off for Verbal Ability was 9 for IIFT 2015 exam. The section had 36 questions in total. The marks allotted for this section was 31. The section was considered easy by most experts and students who had appeared for the exam.
The reading comprehension section had lengthy paragraphs. The questions that were asked were rather simple and straight forward. The candidates could easily complete the 3 passages in 20 minutes. The average number of correct attempts was 10 for the sections as the paper had a low difficulty level. The verbal ability section was also easy and direct questions were asked.
On the basis of the difficulty level, a candidate could easily finish the verbal ability questions within 15 minutes. A candidate could attempt almost 28 questions of the VA and RC section in 35 minutes.
2. Logical Reasoning and Data Interpretation
The cut off for the LR/DI section was 9.5. There were 4 sets of questions in the LR/DI section. The questions were asked on various topics such as Distribution, Linear Arrangement, Order Sequencing and Network & Routes.
There were questions on syllogism (Logical connectives), Operator based questions and a question on number series. The section was easy to attempt. The only issue was with the Linear Arrangement set. The questions had average difficulty level for Linear Arrangement set. The LR section was easy and candidates who have attempted most of the LR questions managed to clear the cut off.
The DI questions had rather difficult calculations. Since, the use of the scientific calculator was prohibited, students who tried to attempt the DI questions wasted a lot of time. The questions that had bar chart display were easy to attempt while the questions designed on ‘Website Traffic and Advertisements’ was quite innovative and interesting.
The candidate who invested around 15 minutes could easily attempt 4-5 questions. The entire section comprising 18-20 questions could be attempted in about 30 minutes.
Read More: IIFT Practice Papers
3. Quantitative Ability
The topic wise distribution of questions in Quantitative Aptitude section is indicated in the table below.
|Question Type||No. of Questions|
|Heights & Distances||1|
Questions were comparatively easy in this section. The questions in the Arithmetic section came from Equations, Percentages, Mixtures, Time & Work, Time & Distance while in Algebra, questions were asked from Progressions, Indices and Logs. The rest of the questions were of average difficulty level. A candidate could easily attempt 12-14 questions in about 35 minutes. The expected cut off for the section was 7.55.
|IIFT Exam Pattern||IIFT Syllabus|
4. General Awareness
The questions were quite easy for candidates who are in the habit of reading newspapers and magazines. Those who are updated about all the current topics had an upper hand. There were in total 28 questions in the section.
The cut off for the section was relatively low. It was between 1.5 and 3.0. The selection of questions was important as the questions had same resemblance and confusion. The questions seemed familiar but again the correct answer was written or not formed the basis for selection.
The IIFT 2014 exam also had primarily 4 sections. There were 2 sections where sub-sections were formed. The Sub-sections were formed in the DI and RC section. A total of 118 questions were asked. The total marks allotted for this section was 100.
The section wise distribution of questions in IIFT 2014 is discussed below in the table
|Section Name||Question Area||No of Questions||Marks per Ques.||Total|
|Section 1 - Part 1||Data Interpretation||15||1||15|
|Section 1 - Part 2||Quantitative Ability||20||1||20|
|Section 2||General Awareness||26||0.5||13|
|Section 3 - Part 1|
|Section 3 - Part 2||Verbal Ability||20||0.75||15|
|Section 4||Logical Reasoning||20||1||20|
The total duration of the exam was around 2 hours. The negative marking scheme was followed. The negative marking of the 1/3rd mark was applicable on total no. of incorrect responses. The marks were deducted on the basis of the marks allotted to a particular question.
|IIFT Results||IIFT Selection Process|
Since, there were around 3-4 sets of question paper, the sequence of questions in the paper is liable to change. The pattern of questions was changing with every set. In general, following pattern was observed among all the sections:
1. Data Interpretation and Quantitative Ability
The number of questions in Data Interpretation section was 15. There were total 4 sets of questions in this section. The calculations were relatively tough. The candidate who attempted only 2 sets i.e., answered around 6-8 questions correctly was able to clear the cut off. The selection of questions was very crucial. The calculations were tricky also.
The Quantitative Aptitude section had 20 questions. The questions were of average difficulty level. Some of the questions were lengthy while others were comparatively easy but to figure out the candidate has to go through all the questions. The QA section was easier than DI section. The candidate who attempted 6-7 DI questions and 9-12 QA questions could score 80% marks easily, provided that the attempts were correct.
However, some questions had incomplete data and ambiguous details which made them slightly confusing for the candidates.
2. Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension
The VR and RC section had 20 and 17 questions respectively. The questions carried 1 marks and 0.75 marks respectively. The loss of marks was 1/3rd as the trend has been there.
The VR section was easy to work with except a few questions on grammar. There were 10 questions on General English. There were around 6 questions on grammar. Also, questions were asked on idioms and PFQ.
There was a question in grammar section where all the options given were incorrect. Since, the candidate can mark only a correct answer from the available options, it is advised in such circumstances not to mark any answer. In such cases, the candidate is awarded marks for not attempting. A wrong attempt can result in negative marking.
The Reading Comprehension section had really long passages. The passages were almost 3 pages long. However, the passages were easy and questions were also direct. The time was required just to read the passage. Some questions were indirect but still one could attempt these with a little bit of effort. A good attempt for the section was 7-8 for RC section and 10-12 for VA section.
3. Logical Reasoning Section
The LR section had mixed type of questions. The section was lengthy and the difficulty level was quite high. The questions came on puzzles, input/output and other related areas. The cut off for the section was relatively low as a result. The selection of question was important. A smart candidate could easily attempt 9-11 questions by leaving all the difficult sets.
4. General Awareness
The General Awareness section had more questions on current affairs as compared to the static GK questions. The cut off was relatively high as the GK section was easy. The candidate who habitually reads the papers and magazines regularly could easily score good marks in this section. An attempt of 8-10 questions will help in clearing the sectional cut off.
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, which will be updated soon subject to the notification issued by the University/College