MAT 2026 (Management Aptitude Test) is conducted by the All India Management Association (AIMA) across four annual sessions — February, May, September, and December — in Paper-Based Test (PBT) and Computer-Based Test (CBT) modes. As of July 30, 2026, two sessions have been completed: the February 2026 session (PBT: March 1, CBT: March 8) and the May 2026 session (PBT: May 31, CBT: June 14; results declared June 22). The September 2026 session (PBT: September 13, CBT: September 20) is upcoming, with registration currently open; the December 2026 session dates are yet to be announced. Both completed sessions were rated Easy to Moderate overall, continuing the stability seen since AIMA introduced the MAT 2.0 format in 2023 — a 150-question, 120-minute paper with five sections of 30 questions each.
Collegedunia gathered direct post-exam feedback from students across centres in Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Chennai, Pune, and Hyderabad after both the March and May–June 2026 sessions. The consensus: MAT 2026 rewarded students who prioritised Arithmetic accuracy and time management over raw attempt volume.
"The paper was balanced and on expected lines. Language Comprehension and Reasoning were very doable, and the absence of caselet DI in the May session made Data Analysis much more manageable. I attempted around 90 out of 120 scored questions with good confidence and am expecting a composite score above 620." — MAT May 2026 PBT student, Bengaluru
- The February 2026 session (PBT: March 1, CBT: March 8) was rated Easy overall — the most accessible completed session of 2026.
- The May 2026 session (PBT: May 31, CBT: June 14) was rated Easy to Moderate; results were declared June 22, 2026.
- Language Comprehension was rated Easy in both sessions; RC passages covered business, economic, and socio-cultural themes that most students found accessible.
- Mathematical Skills remained the most time-consuming section, with Arithmetic (percentages, profit & loss, ratio-proportion) accounting for 40–45% of section questions across all slots.
- Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency carried no caselet-based DI in the May 2026 session — a notable reduction in cognitive load compared to 2025.
- Students targeting a 90–95 percentile composite score (600–680 out of 800) aimed for 82–95 accurate attempts across the four scored sections.
- The September 2026 session (PBT: September 13, CBT: September 20) is upcoming; paper analysis for this session will be updated on this page post-exam.
Based on student feedback and expert analysis from both completed 2026 sessions, a composite score of 600–650 corresponds to approximately 88–93 percentile — students targeting top MAT-accepting B-schools should aim for 700 and above, which requires 100+ accurate attempts with 90%+ accuracy across the four scored sections.
MAT 2026 Question Paper with Solution PDF
| MAT 2026 September Session Question Paper (PBT: Sep 13 | CBT: Sep 20) | Available after exam | Check Solutions |
| MAT 2026 February Session Question Paper (PBT: Mar 1 | CBT: Mar 8) | Download PDF | Check Solutions |
| MAT 2026 May Session Question Paper (PBT: May 31 | CBT: Jun 14) | Download PDF | Check Solutions |
MAT 2026 Students’ Feedback
Students who appeared across the February and May 2026 sessions of MAT 2026 reported a balanced, predictable paper. The overall difficulty remained Easy to Moderate in both completed sessions — consistent with the MAT 2.0 format’s post-2023 trend. Mathematical Skills was the most time-intensive section, while Language Comprehension and Intelligence & Critical Reasoning provided the clearest opportunities to maximise the four-section composite score. The Economic & Business Environment section, which is not counted in the 200–800 composite score, was rated Easy in both sessions.
- Students found the 2026 papers easier than or comparable to MAT 2025, particularly in Language Comprehension — where RC passages shifted to concise business and socio-cultural themes from the more abstract literary passages of earlier years.
- Arithmetic questions in Mathematical Skills accounted for 40–45% of the section, covering percentages, profit & loss, ratio-proportion, simple and compound interest — the most reliable sub-topic cluster to master for MAT.
- No caselet-based DI appeared in the May 2026 session’s Data Analysis section, reducing cognitive load versus 2025 where caselets were present in both sessions.
- Intelligence & Critical Reasoning was well-balanced across both sessions; Blood Relations, Coding-Decoding, and Letter/Number Series appeared reliably in every slot.
- Students attempting 88–100 accurate responses across the four scored sections (out of 120) with 85%+ accuracy reported strong composite score confidence post-exam.
MAT 2026 — Session-wise Difficulty and Good Attempts (Upcoming First)
| Session | Mode | Exam Date | Overall Difficulty | Good Attempts (out of 120 scored) | Expected Composite Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2026 | PBT | September 13, 2026 | To be updated after exam | — | — |
| September 2026 | CBT | September 20, 2026 | To be updated after exam | — | — |
| December 2026 | PBT | To be announced | To be updated after exam | — | — |
| December 2026 | CBT | To be announced | To be updated after exam | — | — |
| February 2026 | PBT | March 1, 2026 | Easy | 95–105 | 620–690 |
| February 2026 | CBT | March 8, 2026 | Easy | 93–103 | 615–680 |
| May 2026 | PBT | May 31, 2026 | Easy to Moderate | 88–98 | 600–660 |
| May 2026 | CBT | June 14, 2026 | Easy to Moderate | 86–96 | 590–655 |
MAT 2026 — Section-wise Difficulty Overview (May 2026, Latest Completed Session)
| Section | Questions | Difficulty (Feb 2026) | Difficulty (May 2026) | Good Attempts | Counted in Composite? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language Comprehension | 30 | Easy | Easy | 22–26 | Yes |
| Mathematical Skills | 30 | Moderate | Moderate | 20–24 | Yes |
| Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency | 30 | Easy to Moderate | Moderate | 19–23 | Yes |
| Intelligence & Critical Reasoning | 30 | Easy to Moderate | Easy to Moderate | 23–27 | Yes |
| Economic & Business Environment | 30 | Easy | Easy | 25–28 | No |
MAT 2026 Students’ Reaction (Ground Feedback)
Ground feedback collected across MAT exam centres in Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Chennai, Pune, and Hyderabad for both the February and May 2026 sessions reflected a broadly positive sentiment. Students found the paper manageable and well within the MAT 2.0 scope, with no section delivering unexpected shocks. The absence of caselet DI in May 2026 was the most-cited positive point across all feedback channels.
Student-Wise Insights
| Student | Session & Mode | Exam Experience | Score Expectation | Key Observations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priya M. | February 2026, PBT | Smooth and well-organised | 630–660 | Language Comprehension was very easy; reallocated time saved to Mathematical Skills |
| Arjun S. | February 2026, CBT | User-friendly interface; no technical issues | 615–640 | Reasoning section was predictable; Data Sufficiency needed careful reading but not complex |
| Meera K. | May 2026, PBT | Comfortable and well-paced | 600–635 | Absence of caselet DI was a big relief; RC passages on business themes were highly accessible |
| Rohit D. | May 2026, CBT | Slightly harder than February overall | 580–620 | A few tricky ratio-proportion questions in Maths; Data Analysis still manageable |
| Kavya R. | May 2026, CBT | Paper firmly within expected range | 615–645 | Standard bar-chart DI; Reasoning very doable; EBE section done in under 12 minutes |
Language Comprehension Section Feedback
- Both 2026 sessions included two Reading Comprehension passages — one on a business or economic theme, the other on a socio-cultural topic; questions were a mix of fact-based and inference-based items.
- Vocabulary questions (synonyms, antonyms, fill-in-the-blanks) drew from contemporary business and editorial usage — no archaic or literary vocabulary that would penalise non-humanities students.
- Grammar questions (error identification, sentence correction) followed the predictable MAT 2.0 pattern that has been stable since 2023.
- Para-jumbles were logically sequenced with clear connectors; most students completed Language Comprehension in 18–24 minutes, banking time for Mathematical Skills.
Mathematical Skills Section Feedback
- Arithmetic dominated at 40–45% of questions — percentages, profit & loss, simple and compound interest, ratio-proportion, and time-speed-distance were the core sub-topics across both sessions.
- Number System, Algebra, and Geometry contributed roughly 4–5 questions each; Modern Mathematics (Permutations & Combinations, Probability) added 3–4 questions.
- This remained the most time-consuming section for a clear majority of students; 30–40 minutes was the standard time allocation.
- Students with strong Arithmetic foundations reported reliable 22–25 question attempts within their time allocation; those who stumbled on Arithmetic felt the pressure compound across the exam.
Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency Section Feedback
- May 2026 DI questions used standard formats — bar charts, pie charts, and line graphs; caselet-based DI was absent, making the section materially more accessible than 2025 where caselets appeared in both sessions.
- Data Sufficiency questions required application of Arithmetic and Mensuration knowledge; the key insight for high scorers was that full calculation was rarely needed — eliminating impossible options was usually sufficient.
- February 2026 featured slightly simpler DI (Easy to Moderate) than May 2026 (Moderate) — both within the standard MAT 2.0 difficulty range.
- Good attempts: 19–23 out of 30, making this the lowest-attempt scored section in both 2026 sessions.
Intelligence & Critical Reasoning Section Feedback
- Classic LR types dominated: Blood Relations, Coding-Decoding, Letter/Number Series, Venn Diagrams, and Syllogisms appeared across all slots in both sessions.
- Critical Reasoning questions (Strengthen/Weaken arguments, Cause-Effect, Inference) carried an 18–20% section share; the May 2026 CBT was marginally more inference-heavy than the February session.
- Students completed this section in 25–30 minutes on average — the second-fastest section after Economic & Business Environment.
- Good attempts: 23–27 out of 30 — this section offered the highest accuracy-to-time ratio among all scored sections in both 2026 sessions.
Economic & Business Environment Section Feedback
- This section is not counted in the MAT composite score (200–800 scale); AIMA excludes it from percentile calculation.
- Questions covered recent business events, Union Budget 2025–26 highlights, RBI policy decisions, Indian startup ecosystem developments, and static GK (Indian geography, history, science).
- Students unanimously finished this section in 12–15 minutes — most attempted it last, treating it as a confidence-builder rather than a score priority.
- Good attempts: 25–28 out of 30. The high attempt rate reflects both the Easy difficulty and the low-stakes nature of the section for composite score purposes.
Attempt & Score Expectations — MAT 2026
- For a composite score of 600+ (approx. 85–88 percentile), target 80–90 accurate attempts across the four scored sections (out of 120).
- For a composite score of 650+ (approx. 92–95 percentile), target 92–100 accurate attempts with 85%+ accuracy — prioritise Language Comprehension and Reasoning for speed and volume.
- For top B-schools (JBIMS, SIMSREE, TAPMI, XIME), a composite score of 700+ is typically required — target 105–115 accurate attempts with 90%+ accuracy.
- Negative marking of 0.25 per wrong answer means random guessing erodes composite scores significantly — educated elimination of two options before guessing is the standard strategy.
- MAT has no sectional time limits — students who complete Language Comprehension and Reasoning early can redistribute that saved time to Mathematical Skills and Data Analysis.
MAT 2026 Language Comprehension Analysis
| Total Questions | 30 |
| Difficulty — February 2026 | Easy |
| Difficulty — May 2026 | Easy |
| Good Attempts | 22–26 out of 30 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 passages (10–12 questions); themes: business/economy and socio-cultural; mix of fact-based and inference-based items; concise passages |
| Vocabulary | Synonyms, antonyms, fill-in-the-blanks — 6–8 questions; contemporary business and editorial word usage |
| Grammar & Usage | Error identification, sentence correction — 4–6 questions; predictable MAT 2.0 style |
| Para-Jumbles / Para-Completion | 3–5 questions; clear logical sequence markers; straightforward ordering |
| Time Required | 18–24 minutes |
| Strategic Priority | Highest — easiest scored section in both 2026 sessions; attempt first, bank time for Mathematical Skills |
MAT 2026 Mathematical Skills Analysis
| Total Questions | 30 |
| Difficulty — February 2026 | Moderate |
| Difficulty — May 2026 | Moderate |
| Good Attempts | 20–24 out of 30 |
| Arithmetic (Dominant) | 40–45% of section (12–14 questions); percentages, profit & loss, simple/compound interest, ratio-proportion, time-speed-distance |
| Number System | 4–5 questions; divisibility rules, HCF/LCM, remainders, unit digit |
| Algebra | 4–5 questions; linear and quadratic equations; standard secondary-level difficulty |
| Geometry & Mensuration | 3–4 questions; areas, volumes, circles, triangles; formula-application type |
| Modern Mathematics | 3–4 questions; permutations, combinations, probability, set theory |
| Time Required | 30–40 minutes |
| Key Strategy | Secure Arithmetic questions first on the first pass; skip Geometry/Modern Maths if they exceed 3 minutes per question and return later; elimination over full calculation where possible |
MAT 2026 Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency Analysis
| Total Questions | 30 |
| Difficulty — February 2026 | Easy to Moderate |
| Difficulty — May 2026 | Moderate |
| Good Attempts | 19–23 out of 30 |
| Data Interpretation (DI) | 15–18 questions across 3–4 sets; bar charts, pie charts, line graphs; 3–5 questions per set; single-variable and two-variable formats |
| Caselet DI | Absent in May 2026 — a significant reduction in cognitive complexity vs 2025 where caselets appeared in both sessions |
| Data Sufficiency | 12–15 questions; two-statement format; requires Arithmetic and Mensuration application; full calculation usually not needed — elimination of impossible options is sufficient |
| Time Required | 25–30 minutes |
| Key Strategy | Attempt Data Sufficiency questions before DI sets — they are faster per mark; scan DI set structure (chart type, question count) before committing; skip combined-chart sets on first pass |
MAT 2026 Intelligence & Critical Reasoning Analysis
| Total Questions | 30 |
| Difficulty — February 2026 | Easy to Moderate |
| Difficulty — May 2026 | Easy to Moderate |
| Good Attempts | 23–27 out of 30 |
| Core Logical Reasoning | Blood Relations (4–5 Q), Coding-Decoding (4–5 Q), Letter/Number Series (4–6 Q), Syllogisms (3–4 Q), Venn Diagrams (2–3 Q) — appeared in every 2026 slot |
| Arrangements & Puzzles | Seating Arrangement and Distribution — 2–4 questions; moderate complexity; not as puzzle-heavy as CAT/XAT |
| Critical Reasoning | 5–6 questions; Strengthen/Weaken arguments, Cause-Effect, Inference; May 2026 CBT was marginally more inference-heavy than February session |
| Time Required | 25–30 minutes |
| Key Strategy | Tackle non-arrangement LR types first for quick scoring wins; attempt puzzles after securing easy marks; read Critical Reasoning argument stems carefully before looking at options |
MAT 2026 Economic & Business Environment Analysis
| Total Questions | 30 |
| Counted in Composite Score? | No — excluded from the 200–800 composite score and percentile calculation; some colleges review the EBE score independently as a general awareness indicator |
| Difficulty — February 2026 | Easy |
| Difficulty — May 2026 | Easy |
| Good Attempts | 25–28 out of 30 |
| Current Affairs (Business & Economy) | 10–12 questions; Union Budget 2025–26 highlights, RBI decisions, global trade themes, Indian startup ecosystem |
| Static GK | 8–10 questions; Indian geography, history, science, national records, cultural milestones, international organisations |
| Financial & Economic Concepts | 6–8 questions; GDP, inflation, banking/monetary terms, stock market fundamentals |
| Sports & Awards | 4–5 questions; national and international sports, Padma Awards, Nobel Prize, government honours |
| Time Required | 12–15 minutes |
| Key Strategy | Attempt last; cap time at 15 minutes regardless of topic familiarity — a high attempt rate is achievable with quick recall alone; never sacrifice time from the four scored sections for EBE |
MAT 2025 Paper Analysis
MAT 2025 followed the same MAT 2.0 format across its four annual sessions (February, May, September, December) in PBT and CBT modes. The February 2025 session (PBT: March 9, CBT: March 23) and the May 2025 session (CBT: June 8) — the two best-documented sessions — were both rated Easy to Moderate overall, matching the 2026 difficulty level. The critical difference from 2026: Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency was rated Moderate to Difficult in 2025 because caselet-based DI appeared in both 2025 sessions, adding cognitive load that was absent from May 2026. The 90+ percentile benchmark for 2025 was a composite score of approximately 110–115 marks across the four scored sections (corresponding to roughly 600–650 on the 200–800 scale). Students with strong Arithmetic and Logical Reasoning preparation consistently outperformed expectations.
- Language Comprehension (Easy to Moderate): RC passages covered economic policy and social enterprise themes; vocabulary and grammar were predictable; good attempts 24–26 out of 30. Slightly harder than 2026’s Easy-rated LC.
- Mathematical Skills (Moderate): Arithmetic-heavy at ~45%; 13–15 questions on interest, percentages, and ratios; good attempts 22–24 out of 30. Consistent with 2026.
- Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency (Moderate to Difficult): Caselet DI present in both 2025 sessions — the primary difficulty differentiator versus 2026; ~50% DI questions; Data Sufficiency required Arithmetic and Mensuration; good attempts 20–22 out of 30.
- Intelligence & Critical Reasoning (Moderate): Well-balanced; Blood Relations, pattern recognition, and Coding-Decoding prominent; good attempts 26–27 out of 30. Slightly harder than 2026’s Easy to Moderate rating.
- Economic & Business Environment (Easy): Static GK and current affairs; good attempts 27–30 out of 30; not counted in composite score. No change from 2026.
| Section | Difficulty (2025) | Good Attempts | Most Asked Topics | Comparison vs MAT 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language Comprehension | Easy to Moderate | 24–26 | RC passages, vocabulary, grammar, para-jumbles | 2026 LC rated Easy — RC themes more accessible in 2026 |
| Mathematical Skills | Moderate | 22–24 | Percentages, interest, ratio-proportion, Arithmetic | No change — Arithmetic dominance identical across both years |
| Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency | Moderate to Difficult | 20–22 | DI graphs/charts (with caselet), Data Sufficiency | 2026 significantly easier — caselet DI absent in May 2026; good attempts higher in 2026 |
| Intelligence & Critical Reasoning | Moderate | 26–27 | Blood Relations, Coding-Decoding, series, arrangements | 2026 ICR rated Easy to Moderate — slightly easier than 2025 |
| Economic & Business Environment | Easy | 27–30 | Static GK, current affairs, business events, sports/awards | No change — consistently Easy and not composite-scored in both years |
MAT Paper Analysis Last 10 Years (2017–2026)
MAT has maintained a Moderate to Easy-to-Moderate difficulty range across the past decade — making it one of the most accessible national-level MBA entrance tests in India. The most significant structural shift was the MAT 2.0 format change in 2023, which reduced the paper from 200 questions in 150 minutes (pre-2.0) to 150 questions in 120 minutes. This reform improved completion rates and slightly moderated overall difficulty by reducing question volume, while maintaining standard topic coverage. Under the old format, students needed 115–135 accurate attempts across four scored sections (out of 160) for the 90+ percentile; under MAT 2.0, the benchmark is 85–100 accurate attempts (out of 120).
- 2017–2021 (MAT Classic, 200Q/150 min): Moderate overall; Mathematical Skills and Data Analysis consistently the hardest sections; both averaged 40 questions per section.
- 2022 (transition year): Moderate; caselet DI appeared heavily in Data Analysis — the most difficult DA year in the decade; highest difficulty spike in the 10-year window.
- 2023 (MAT 2.0 launch): Settled at Easy to Moderate; students adapted to the shorter format quickly; Caselet DI continued but at reduced frequency.
- 2024–2026: Stable Easy to Moderate; caselet DI absent in May 2026; Language Comprehension at its most accessible in four years in 2026.
| Year | Overall Difficulty | Language Comprehension | Mathematical Skills | Data Analysis & Sufficiency | Intelligence & CR | Format | Good Attempts (Scored Sections) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (Feb & May) | Easy to Moderate | Easy | Moderate | Easy to Moderate / Moderate | Easy to Moderate | MAT 2.0 (150Q / 120 min); PBT + CBT | 88–105 out of 120 |
| 2025 | Easy to Moderate | Easy to Moderate | Moderate | Moderate to Difficult | Moderate | MAT 2.0 (150Q / 120 min); PBT + CBT | 83–100 out of 120 |
| 2024 | Easy to Moderate | Easy to Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Easy to Moderate | MAT 2.0 (150Q / 120 min); PBT + CBT | 82–96 out of 120 |
| 2023 | Easy to Moderate | Easy | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | MAT 2.0 debut (150Q / 120 min); PBT + CBT | 80–95 out of 120 |
| 2022 | Moderate | Easy to Moderate | Moderate | Moderate to Difficult | Moderate | Pre-2.0 (200Q / 150 min); PBT + CBT + IBT | 115–135 out of 160 |
| 2021 | Moderate | Easy to Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Pre-2.0 (200Q / 150 min); IBT introduced | 120–138 out of 160 |
| 2020 | Easy to Moderate | Easy | Moderate | Moderate | Easy to Moderate | Pre-2.0 (200Q / 150 min); COVID reduced sessions | 125–145 out of 160 |
| 2019 | Moderate | Easy to Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Pre-2.0 (200Q / 150 min); PBT + CBT | 118–135 out of 160 |
| 2018 | Moderate | Easy to Moderate | Moderate to Difficult | Moderate | Moderate | Pre-2.0 (200Q / 150 min); PBT + CBT | 112–130 out of 160 |
| 2017 | Easy to Moderate | Easy | Moderate | Moderate | Easy to Moderate | Pre-2.0 (200Q / 150 min); PBT + CBT | 125–145 out of 160 |
MAT Section-wise Dominance (2017–2026)
| Section | 10-Year Trend (2017–2026) |
|---|---|
| Language Comprehension | Shifted from Moderate (abstract/literary RC, 2017–2020) to Easy to Moderate (business and socio-economic RC, 2021 onward). 2026 is the most accessible LC in four years. Vocabulary and grammar question patterns have been stable since 2023. |
| Mathematical Skills | Moderate throughout the decade. Arithmetic (percentages, interest, ratio-proportion) has been the dominant sub-topic every year at 40–50% of section questions. Geometry and Modern Maths share reduced post-MAT 2.0. Consistently the most time-consuming section. |
| Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency | Most variable scored section in MAT. Caselet DI — introduced in 2022 — is the primary difficulty amplifier; its absence in May 2026 made the 2026 DA section significantly more accessible than 2025. Data Sufficiency rewards fast elimination over full calculation in every year. |
| Intelligence & Critical Reasoning | Stable Easy to Moderate. Blood Relations and Coding-Decoding have appeared in every session without exception for 10 consecutive years. Critical Reasoning share grew from ~10% in 2017 to ~18–20% in 2025–2026. Consistently the second-highest scoring section after Language Comprehension. |
| Economic & Business Environment | Easy in every year — the flattest difficulty trend in MAT. Not counted in the composite score. Content mix stable at ~40% current affairs (Union Budget and RBI policy recur annually) and ~30–35% static GK. Consistently completed in 12–15 minutes by well-prepared students. |
MAT Language Comprehension Analysis (2017–2026)
- RC themes made a decisive shift post-2021 from abstract/literary passages to business, economics, and social issues — directly relevant to MBA aspirants and more accessible under time pressure.
- Vocabulary question count stabilised at 6–8 per session under MAT 2.0; synonym/antonym pairs draw from contemporary business and editorial usage, not archaic vocabulary.
- Grammar-based questions (error correction, sentence improvement) have followed a predictable pattern for five consecutive years; no curveballs since 2022.
| Year | Difficulty | Key Sub-types | RC Passage Themes | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (Feb & May) | Easy | RC, vocabulary, grammar, para-jumbles | Business/economy and socio-cultural topics | Most accessible LC in four years; strongest section for composite score-building |
| 2025 | Easy to Moderate | RC, vocabulary, grammar | Economic policy, social enterprise, urban development | Mix of fact-based and opinion-based RC; slightly harder than 2026 |
| 2024 | Easy to Moderate | RC, synonyms, sentence correction | Business, technology, sustainability | Fact-based RC dominant; grammar questions fully predictable |
| 2023 | Easy | RC, vocabulary, grammar, para-jumbles | Business/economics, socio-cultural | MAT 2.0 debut; RC reduced from 3 passages (40Q era) to 2; business-themed RC consistent |
| 2022 | Easy to Moderate | RC, idioms, para-jumbles, cloze test | Finance, international relations, trade | Pre-MAT 2.0; 3 RC passages added slight reading load; cloze test still present |
| 2021 | Easy to Moderate | RC, vocabulary, one-word substitution, sentence completion | Economic recovery, digital transformation | Heavier vocabulary question count (14–16 Q in 40-question format); online-only year |
| 2020 | Easy | RC, antonyms, sentence completion, fill-in-blanks | Public health, business resilience, environment | COVID year; passages included health/economic recovery themes; easiest LC of the pre-2.0 era |
| 2019 | Easy to Moderate | RC, idioms, fill-in-blanks, cloze test | Technology, global affairs, social issues | RC passages slightly longer than post-2020; cloze test had 5–6 questions |
| 2018 | Easy to Moderate | RC, synonyms, grammar, para-jumbles | Economic policy, education reform | Grammar question count increased from 2017; RC passages shorter and more accessible |
| 2017 | Easy | RC, vocabulary, sentence correction | Literary, political commentary | Baseline year; abstract literary RC themes made this harder for non-humanities students vs later years |
MAT Mathematical Skills Analysis (2017–2026)
- Arithmetic has dominated every MAT session for 10 years at 40–50% of section questions — the most stable and predictable trend in MAT’s testing history.
- Geometry and Modern Mathematics questions reduced in absolute count post-MAT 2.0 (from ~6–8 each to ~3–5 each) as the section shrank from 40 to 30 questions, though their relative share stayed broadly similar.
- The section peaked in difficulty in 2018 when Geometry and advanced Number Theory appeared in unusual proportions; it has eased consistently since 2019.
| Year | Difficulty | Dominant Topics | Arithmetic Share | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (Feb & May) | Moderate | Arithmetic, Ratio, Interest, Number System | ~42–45% | No difficulty shift from 2025; Geometry present but skip-first strategy recommended |
| 2025 | Moderate | Arithmetic, Percentages, Profit & Loss | ~45% | 13–15 arithmetic questions per sitting; most time-consuming scored section of 2025 |
| 2024 | Moderate | Arithmetic, Ratio, Interest, Algebra | ~46% | Consistent with 2023; balanced distribution; no new question types |
| 2023 | Moderate | Arithmetic, Algebra, Number System | ~44% | MAT 2.0 debut; 30Q cap; Geometry and Modern Maths reduced in absolute count |
| 2022 | Moderate | Arithmetic, Geometry, Algebra, Modern Maths | ~40% | Pre-2.0 40Q format; Geometry had higher absolute count; transition year uncertainty |
| 2021 | Moderate | Arithmetic, Modern Maths, Geometry, Algebra | ~40% | Classic format; 40 questions per section; difficulty consistent with 2019–2020 |
| 2020 | Moderate | Arithmetic, Algebra, Number System | ~42% | Fewer sessions due to COVID; Arithmetic dominance unchanged |
| 2019 | Moderate | Arithmetic, Algebra, Permutation-Combination | ~41% | Algebra weight increased from 2018; eased after 2018’s Geometry/Number Theory spike |
| 2018 | Moderate to Difficult | Arithmetic, Geometry, Algebra, Number Theory | ~38% | Toughest MS year in 10-year window; Geometry and Number Theory unusually heavy; good attempts dipped |
| 2017 | Moderate | Arithmetic, Algebra, Number System | ~43% | Baseline year; standard Arithmetic-dominated paper; no unusual question types |
MAT Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency Analysis (2017–2026)
- Data Interpretation (bar charts, pie charts, line graphs) has consistently formed 60–70% of this section across all years and both format versions.
- Caselet-based DI — introduced in 2022 — is the single biggest difficulty amplifier in this section; its presence in 2022, 2023, and 2025 drove Moderate to Difficult ratings; its absence in May 2026 is the primary reason 2026 DA is more accessible than 2025.
- Data Sufficiency stabilised at 10–12 questions per session under MAT 2.0 — down from 14–16 in the 40-question classic era — rewarding fast elimination over full calculation.
| Year | Difficulty | DI Question Types | Caselet DI Present? | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (Feb & May) | Easy to Moderate / Moderate | Bar charts, pie charts, line graphs | No (May 2026); No (Feb 2026) | Caselet DI absent in both completed 2026 sessions — accessibility gain vs 2025 |
| 2025 | Moderate to Difficult | Graphs, charts, Data Sufficiency | Yes (both sessions) | ~50% DI; DS required Arithmetic + Mensuration; caselet DI in both Feb and May 2025 |
| 2024 | Moderate | Bar charts, line graphs, two-chart combo DI | Occasional (some sessions) | Two-chart combination DI sets time-consuming; caselet appeared in some sessions |
| 2023 | Moderate | Bar charts, tables, mixed DI | Yes (some sessions) | MAT 2.0 debut; DI question count fell from 28+ to 18–20; section more manageable overall |
| 2022 | Moderate to Difficult | Pie charts, bar charts, caselets | Yes (peak frequency) | Toughest DA year in 10-year window; caselet DI at highest proportion; many students ran out of time |
| 2021 | Moderate | Line graphs, bar charts, caselets, DS | Yes (some sessions) | 40-question DAS; caselet present but not peak; time management the key differentiator |
| 2020 | Moderate | Bar charts, line graphs, DS sets | No | Fewer sessions; consistent with 2019; two-variable DI appeared in select sessions |
| 2019 | Moderate | Bar charts, pie charts, caselets, DS | Yes (high frequency) | Caselet DI frequency high in the pre-2.0 format; skip-caselet-first was the dominant strategy |
| 2018 | Moderate | Bar charts, tables, DS sets | No | DS questions easier than DI; balanced section within an overall harder 2018 paper |
| 2017 | Moderate | Bar charts, pie charts, DS sets | No | Baseline year; standard DI-DS split; no unusual formats |
MAT Intelligence & Critical Reasoning Analysis (2017–2026)
- Blood Relations and Coding-Decoding have appeared in every MAT session for 10 consecutive years — the most reliable topic cluster to prepare in the entire exam.
- Critical Reasoning grew from roughly 10% of section questions in 2017 to 18–20% in 2025–2026 — reflecting AIMA’s increasing focus on managerial decision-making aptitude in the MAT 2.0 era.
- ICR has never been rated above Moderate in the 10-year window — it consistently offers the best accuracy-to-time ratio among the four scored sections.
| Year | Difficulty | Key Topics | Critical Reasoning Share | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (Feb & May) | Easy to Moderate | Blood Relations, Coding-Decoding, Series, CR Arguments | ~18–20% | May 2026 CBT marginally more inference-heavy in CR; February session the easier of the two |
| 2025 | Moderate | Blood Relations, Coding-Decoding, Arrangements, CR | ~20% | Well-balanced; family relations and pattern recognition prominent; slightly harder than 2026 |
| 2024 | Easy to Moderate | Blood Relations, Series, Coding-Decoding, CR | ~20% | CR share grew further; inference component stronger than 2023; consistent with 2026 |
| 2023 | Moderate | Coding, Blood Relations, Arrangements, CR | ~18% | MAT 2.0 debut; ICR rated Moderate in 2023 as students adjusted to new 30Q format |
| 2022 | Moderate | Arrangements, Coding, CR Arguments, Blood Relations | ~18% | CR share crossed 15% consistently for the first time; classic 40Q format |
| 2021 | Moderate | Blood Relations, Coding-Decoding, Analytical Puzzles, Venn Diagrams | ~15% | Classic format; well-balanced; difficulty consistent with 2019–2020 |
| 2020 | Easy to Moderate | Coding, Number/Letter Series, Venn Diagrams, Blood Relations | ~15% | Easier year overall; highest good-attempts count for ICR in the 10-year window |
| 2019 | Moderate | LR Sets, Blood Relations, CR Arguments, Directional Sense | ~15% | CR question count increased from 2018 onward; inference-based questions introduced |
| 2018 | Moderate | Coding-Decoding, LR Sets, Venn Diagrams, CR Arguments | ~12% | Standard; Venn Diagram questions grew vs 2017; difficulty matched baseline year |
| 2017 | Easy to Moderate | Blood Relations, Coding-Decoding, Number Series, Venn Diagrams | ~10% | Baseline year; classic LR dominant; minimal CR component; highest completion rate in review window |
MAT Economic & Business Environment Analysis (2017–2026)
- The Economic & Business Environment section has been rated Easy in every year across the 10-year window — the only section with a perfectly flat difficulty trend.
- Current Affairs coverage recurrently includes Union Budget, RBI monetary policy, India’s trade relations, and major government schemes — reliable enough that students who follow business news monthly can answer 10–12 questions without specific GK study.
- Static GK has held at 30–35% of the section throughout — Indian history, geography, science, national records, and cultural events are perennial fixtures.
| Year | Difficulty | Key Focus Areas | Recurring Current Affairs Themes | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (Feb & May) | Easy | Budget, RBI policy, digital economy, awards, AI policy | Union Budget 2025–26 implementation, global markets, AI governance | Same familiar pattern; AI/digital economy questions entered the mix in 2026 for the first time |
| 2025 | Easy | Budget 2025–26, RBI policy, global trade, sports | Union Budget 2025–26, US tariff policy, India’s digital economy milestones | Budget 2025–26 questions reliable across both 2025 sessions; static GK balance maintained |
| 2024 | Easy | Interim Budget 2024, RBI, startups, sports, elections | 2024 general elections, interim budget highlights, Indian startup unicorns | Election-year CA; awards and international summits well-represented |
| 2023 | Easy | Budget 2023, G20 India Presidency, Finance | G20 New Delhi Summit, UPI global milestones, India growth projections | MAT 2.0 debut; section content unchanged despite format reform; G20 questions prevalent |
| 2022 | Easy | Budget 2022, Financial markets, Trade | Russia-Ukraine economic impact, RBI rate hikes, crypto regulations | Global events entered CA prominently; static GK content unchanged from prior years |
| 2021 | Easy | Economic recovery, Digital India, Financial markets | AtmaNirbhar Bharat, PLI schemes, vaccine rollout economic impact | Policy-heavy CA; static GK stable and predictable; online-only year |
| 2020 | Easy | COVID-19 economy, RBI emergency measures, public health | Economic stimulus packages, RBI rate cuts, AtmaNirbhar Bharat announcement | Most distinctive CA set in the 10-year window; health-economy crossover themes unique to 2020 |
| 2019 | Easy | Business, Finance, India-World relations | General elections 2019, NBFC liquidity crisis, RBI repo rate decisions | Election-year CA mixed with routine business GK; static GK stable |
| 2018 | Easy | Budget, RBI policy, trade, banking | India-US trade tensions, banking sector consolidation, GST refinements | Global and domestic CA balanced; banking sector questions grew post-PNB scam |
| 2017 | Easy | Economy, Finance, Sports, Awards | Demonetisation (Nov 2016) economic impact, GST launch (Jul 2017) | Baseline year; major domestic policy events dominated CA; static GK straightforward |
MAT 2026 Paper Analysis — Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. What was the overall difficulty level of MAT 2026?
Both completed 2026 sessions — February (PBT: March 1, CBT: March 8) and May (PBT: May 31, CBT: June 14) — were rated Easy to Moderate overall. The February session was marginally easier. The September 2026 session (PBT: September 13, CBT: September 20) is upcoming; its analysis will be updated on this page after the exam.
Q2. How many questions should you attempt for a good percentile in MAT 2026?
For a composite score of 600+ (approximately 85–90 percentile), target 80–90 accurate attempts across the four scored sections (out of 120 total). For 650+ (92–95 percentile), target 90–100 accurate attempts with 85%+ accuracy. Negative marking of 0.25 per wrong answer makes accuracy more valuable than volume — avoid guessing without eliminating at least two options first.
Q3. Which section was toughest in MAT 2026?
Mathematical Skills was the most time-consuming section in both 2026 sessions, with 40–45% Arithmetic questions consuming 30–40 minutes. Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency was the most variable — rated Easy to Moderate in February and Moderate in May 2026. Crucially, the absence of caselet DI in May 2026 made DA significantly more accessible than in 2025.
Q4. What is a good MAT 2026 composite score for MBA admissions?
The MAT composite score is reported on a 200–800 scale based on four scored sections (the Economic & Business Environment section is excluded). A composite score of 600–680 corresponds to approximately 90–95 percentile — sufficient for admission to a wide range of reputed MBA colleges. Top B-schools (JBIMS, SIMSREE, TAPMI, XIME) typically require 700+.
Q5. When is the MAT 2026 September session and how to register?
The MAT 2026 September session is scheduled for PBT on September 13, 2026 and CBT on September 20, 2026. PBT registration closes September 7, 2026; CBT registration closes September 14, 2026. Registration fee is ₹2,300 for a single mode or ₹4,000 for both modes. Visit mat.aima.in for official registration.
Q6. Does the Economic & Business Environment section affect the MAT score?
No. The Economic & Business Environment section is not counted in the composite score (200–800). Your composite score derives only from Language Comprehension, Mathematical Skills, Data Analysis & Data Sufficiency, and Intelligence & Critical Reasoning. Some participating colleges review the EBE score independently as a general awareness indicator alongside the composite score.
Q7. How does MAT 2026 compare to MAT 2025 in difficulty?
MAT 2026 (February and May sessions) was overall slightly easier than MAT 2025. The most significant difference: caselet-based DI was absent in May 2026, whereas it appeared in both 2025 sessions — making the 2026 Data Analysis section noticeably more accessible. Language Comprehension was rated Easy in 2026 versus Easy to Moderate in 2025. Mathematical Skills difficulty and Arithmetic dominance remained unchanged across both years.
Q8. What is the MAT 2.0 format and how does it differ from the earlier pattern?
AIMA introduced MAT 2.0 in 2023. Under the new format, the exam has 150 questions across five sections (30 each) in 120 minutes, down from 200 questions in 150 minutes in the classic format. The composite score scale (200–800) and the exclusion of the Economic & Business Environment section from the composite calculation are unchanged. The 90+ percentile good-attempts benchmark shifted from 115–135 (out of 160 scored questions) to 85–100 (out of 120 scored questions) with the format revision.
Disclaimer: The paper analysis, difficulty ratings, good attempts, expected composite score ranges, and percentile projections on this page are compiled from student feedback across exam centres, coaching institute analyses (IMS, TIME, Career Launcher, HitBullseye), and subject-expert reviews after each session. Actual percentile-to-score mapping may vary. Data for upcoming sessions (September and December 2026) will be updated on this page after those exams are conducted. For official results, score cards, and cutoff notifications, refer to the official AIMA website at mat.aima.in.








Comments