Maths Mentor, Delhi University | Updated on - Jul 21, 2026
Download the NCERT Exemplar Class 12 Maths Determinants as a free PDF. The NCERT Exemplar Class 12 Maths Determinants solve every problem in the Exemplar set on Class 12 Mathematics Chapter 4 Determinants, with the working written line by line and the answer verified at the end. The solutions PDF are suitable for JEE Main and Board preparation alike.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
Use the resource above alongside the chapter breakdown below.
CBSE Weightage: 10 marks (Unit II: Algebra, shared with Matrices; one LA on determinant properties plus one SA on adjoint / inverse or Cramer's rule)
JEE Main Weightage: 3 to 5% of paper (1 to 2 questions per shift, mostly on properties, cofactor expansion, or singular-matrix conditions)
Exemplar Problems Solved: 58 in total (17 SA + 6 LA + 14 MCQ + 10 Fill-in-the-Blanks + 11 True / False)
58 Exemplar problems solved
5 Question formats covered
10 CBSE marks (Unit II)
Topics span cofactor expansion, row-column properties, the inverse formula A-1 = 1|A| adj(A) , area of a triangle, Cramer's rule, and consistency when |A| = 0 .
Curated by Collegedunia subject experts, mapped to the 2026-27 NCERT, and benchmarked against five years of CBSE and JEE Main papers.
How Collegedunia's Exemplar Solutions Help You Crack Class 12 Determinants
The NCERT Exemplar Class 12 Maths Determinants address this in the same order as the NCERT textbook.
One sign slip in a cofactor wipes out a 5-mark answer, and the Exemplar chains two or three properties per problem. Each of our 58 solutions names every rule invoked, shows an alternate method wherever a row / column operation beats direct expansion (a 7-minute expand can collapse to 90 seconds), and follows current NCERT notation.
Determinants Top 5 Properties for Exemplar Problems
Almost every Exemplar SA, LA, and MCQ reduces to one of the five identities below.
Determinants Class 12 Weightage Snapshot Across Chapters
Chapter 4 sits in the mid-band of Class 12 Maths weightage; the chart below places its 10-mark share alongside the other 12 chapters.
Chapter
CBSE Marks
Weightage Bar
Ch 1 Relations and Functions
8
Ch 2 Inverse Trigonometric Functions
4
Ch 3 Matrices
10
Ch 4 Determinants
10
Ch 5 Continuity and Differentiability
15
Ch 6 Application of Derivatives
10
Ch 7 Integrals
15
Ch 8 Application of Integrals
5
Ch 9 Differential Equations
10
Ch 10 Vector Algebra
10
Ch 11 Three Dimensional Geometry
10
Ch 12 Linear Programming
5
Ch 13 Probability
8
Chapter 4 ties with Matrices at 10 marks, together carrying the entire Unit II algebra block; a strong Determinants prep doubles as Matrices reinforcement through the shared cofactor / inverse machinery.
JEE Main Prep Value of the Determinants Exemplar
JEE Main repeats the property-driven evaluation pattern two shifts in three; the 14-MCQ Exemplar block (Q 4.24 to 4.37) is the closest year-round drill. The MCQs span every property in two passes, chain two properties at a time like JEE Main 2024 and 2025 hard-set items, and the True / False block (Q 4.48 to 4.58) trains the disproof reflex for assertion-reason questions.
All NCERT Exemplar Questions for Determinants with Step-by-Step Solutions
Every question of the NCERT Exemplar set for Class 12 Mathematics Chapter 4 Determinants is listed below with its full Solution and Expert Solution hidden inside collapsible tabs. Click Check Solution to reveal the step-by-step working; click Expert Solution for the expanded explanation.
I. Short Answer (S.A.)
Q 4.1
Using the properties of determinants, evaluate
vmatrix x2-x+1 & x-1 x+1 & x+1vmatrix.
Concept used. For a 2× 2 determinant
vmatrixa&b c&dvmatrix=ad-bc. We can also use the
column operation C1→ C1-C2 (which leaves the
value unchanged) to simplify before expanding.
Direct-expansion angle. For a 2× 2 we can also just
expand by ad-bc and simplify at the end –- the column operation
above is a one-line shortcut, but the direct computation is just
as quick once you keep the algebra tidy.
Expand directly:
Δ = (x2-x+1)(x+1) - (x-1)(x+1).
First product: (x2-x+1)(x+1) = x3+x2 - x2-x + x+1 = x3+1.
(This is the standard identity a2-a+1 = (a3+1)/(a+1)
rewritten.)
Second product: (x-1)(x+1) = x2-1.
Subtract:
Δ = (x3+1) - (x2-1) = x3-x2+2.
Cross-check at x=1: original
vmatrix1&0 2&2vmatrix=2;
our formula gives 1-1+2=2. Match.
Δ = x3-x2+2.
Q 4.2
Using the properties of determinants, evaluate
vmatrix a+x & y & zx & a+y & zx & y & a+zvmatrix.
Concept used. The operation
C1→ C1+C2+C3 adds the second and third columns
to the first column. Determinant value is unchanged. After this,
every entry in column 1 will be a+x+y+z, allowing us to factor
(a+x+y+z) out of C1.
Apply C1→ C1+C2+C3. New first-column entries:
aligned
(a+x)+y+z &= a+x+y+z, x+(a+y)+z &= a+x+y+z, x+y+(a+z) &= a+x+y+z.
aligned
So
Δ = vmatrix a+x+y+z & y & za+x+y+z & a+y & za+x+y+z & y & a+zvmatrix.
Factor (a+x+y+z) out of C1:
Δ = (a+x+y+z)vmatrix 1 & y & z 1 & a+y & z 1 & y & a+zvmatrix.
Apply R2→ R2-R1 and R3→ R3-R1:
Δ = (a+x+y+z)vmatrix 1 & y & z 0 & a & 0 0 & 0 & avmatrix.
The right matrix is upper-triangular, so its determinant
equals the product of diagonal entries: 1· a· a = a2.
Δ = a2(a+x+y+z).
PI
Priya Iyer
Ph.D Pure Mathematics, IISc Bangalore
Verified Expert
Symmetry angle. Notice that every row of the determinant
has the structure (something plus a) + (rest of the row),
and the three columns play symmetric roles. The column-sum trick
exploits this symmetry to create a column of identical entries.
After C1→ C1+C2+C3, every entry of C1 is S = a+x+y+z. Pull S out.
The reduced determinant has C1 = (1,1,1)T. Apply
R2→ R2-R1, R3→ R3-R1 to wipe everything below
the top-left 1.
The result is vmatrix1&y&z 0&a&0 0&0&avmatrix,
upper triangular with diagonal 1,a,a. Determinant = a2.
Combine: Δ = S· a2 = a2(a+x+y+z).
Sanity check at x=y=z=0: original
vmatrixa&0&0 0&a&0 0&0&avmatrix=a3.
Formula: a2(a+0+0+0)=a3. Match.
Δ = a2(a+x+y+z).
Q 4.3
Using the properties of determinants, evaluate
vmatrix 0 & xy2 & xz2 x2y & 0 & yz2 x2z & zy2 & 0vmatrix.
Concept used. A common factor can be pulled out of any row
or column: if every entry of column j contains a factor k, the
determinant equals k times the determinant with that factor
removed. We use this repeatedly to extract x, y, z.
Look at column 1: entries are 0, x2y, x2z. Factor
x2 out of C1 (the 0 stays a 0). Actually a cleaner
path is to factor row-by-row. Row 1:(0, xy2, xz2)
= x·(0, y2, z2). Pull out x.
Row 2:(x2y, 0, yz2) = y·(x2, 0, z2).
Pull out y. Row 3:(x2z, zy2, 0) = z·(x2, y2, 0).
Pull out z.
Δ = xyzvmatrix 0 & y2 & z2 x2 & 0 & z2 x2 & y2 & 0vmatrix.
Now factor by column: C1 entries are 0, x2, x2
–- pull x2 from C1. Likewise y2 from C2, and
z2 from C3:
Δ = xyz· x2y2z2vmatrix 0 & 1 & 1 1 & 0 & 1 1 & 1 & 0vmatrix.
Power-counting angle. Total degree of every term in the
expansion of Δ is 9 (each diagonal product has three
factors, each of total degree 3). And the answer must be
symmetric in (x,y,z) up to a sign because the determinant has a
nice symmetric pattern. Both observations point at 2x3y3z3.
Pull x, y, z from rows 1,2,3: factor xyz.
Pull x2, y2, z2 from columns 1,2,3: factor
x2y2z2.
The leftover is the constant determinant
vmatrix0&1&1 1&0&1 1&1&0vmatrix = 2.
Multiply: Δ = xyz· x2y2z2· 2 = 2x3y3z3.
Cross-check the sign at x=y=z=1: original is
vmatrix0&1&1 1&0&1 1&1&0vmatrix=2, formula
gives 2· 1=2. Match.
Δ = 2x3y3z3.
Why this matters. The pattern ``every row has a common
factor, every column also has a common factor'' is the standard
factorisation trick for symmetric polynomial determinants. Whenever
the final answer ought to be a monomial of total degree
deg(row factors)· 3 + deg(column factors)· 3,
spotting it in advance lets you skip the full 3× 3 expansion.
Common mistake. Students often forget that pulling a
factor from a row affects only that row, not the whole determinant.
Each pull multiplies the determinant by the pulled factor exactly
once.
Q 4.4
Using the properties of determinants, evaluate
vmatrix 3x & -x+y & -x+zx-y & 3y & z-yx-z & y-z & 3zvmatrix.
Concept used. Apply C1→ C1+C2+C3 and look at each
row sum. We'll find that every row of C1 becomes x+y+z, after
which the standard ``factor out and reduce'' chain follows.
Row 1 sum across the three columns:
3x + (-x+y) + (-x+z) = x+y+z.
Row 2 sum: (x-y) + 3y + (z-y) = x+y+z.
Row 3 sum: (x-z) + (y-z) + 3z = x+y+z.
So after C1→ C1+C2+C3, the new column 1 is
(x+y+z, x+y+z, x+y+z)T.
Pattern angle. The matrix has the form ``3·diagonal+
deviations'' that sum nicely. The column-sum trick collapses the
problem to a 2× 2 which is just arithmetic.
C1→ C1+C2+C3 makes column 1 constant =x+y+z. Factor it out.
R2→ R2-R1, R3→ R3-R1 zeros out column 1
below the top entry.
Expand along C1: a 2× 2 block
vmatrixx+2y & x-yx-z & x+2zvmatrix remains.
Multiply by the factor (x+y+z): Δ = 3(x+y+z)(xy+yz+zx).
3(x+y+z)(xy+yz+zx).
Why this matters. The combined factor
(x+y+z)(xy+yz+zx) is itself 12[(x+y+z)3 - (x3+y3+z3)],
a familiar symmetric polynomial. The determinant version of this
identity recurs in JEE problems on symmetric matrices.
Strategic insight. The combination
(x+y+z)(xy+yz+zx) is the second elementary symmetric polynomial
times the first, in disguise. Knowing both routes (the column-sum
collapse and the algebraic expansion) means you can pick whichever
is faster in an exam.
Numerical check. At x=y=z=1: each row is (3,0,0)
after the column-sum trick. Determinant: 3(1+1+1)(1+1+1) = 27.
Direct expansion: 3I matrix from the question gives determinant 27.
Examples-driven approach. For determinant problems with
linear entries in three variables, try (0,0,0),(1,0,0),(1,1,1)
to disambiguate option choices.
Q 4.5
Using the properties of determinants, evaluate
vmatrix x+4 & x & xx & x+4 & xx & x & x+4vmatrix.
Concept used. Same column-sum trick as before: each row
sums to 3x+4, so C1→ C1+C2+C3 creates a column of
identical entries, which we factor out.
Sum across each row: (x+4)+x+x = 3x+4;
x+(x+4)+x = 3x+4; x+x+(x+4) = 3x+4. All equal.
Apply C1→ C1+C2+C3:
Δ = vmatrix 3x+4 & x & x 3x+4 & x+4 & x 3x+4 & x & x+4vmatrix.
Factor (3x+4) from C1:
Δ = (3x+4)vmatrix 1 & x & x 1 & x+4 & x 1 & x & x+4vmatrix.
Apply R2→ R2-R1 and R3→ R3-R1:
Δ = (3x+4)vmatrix 1 & x & x 0 & 4 & 0 0 & 0 & 4vmatrix.
Upper-triangular: determinant = 1· 4· 4 = 16.
Multiply: Δ = 16(3x+4).
Δ = 16(3x+4).
KV
Karan Verma
M.Tech CS, IIT Madras
Verified Expert
Eigenvalue angle. The matrix is 4I + xJ where
J is the all-ones matrix. The eigenvalues of J are 3 (once)
and 0 (twice), so the eigenvalues of 4I+xJ are 4+3x = 3x+4
(once) and 4 (twice). The determinant is the product:
(3x+4)· 4· 4 = 16(3x+4).
Concept used. For a normal matrix, det(M) = product
of eigenvalues.
Recognise M = 4I + xJ where J is the all-ones 3× 3 matrix.
Eigenvalues of J: rank 1, so λ=3 (eigenvector
(1,1,1)T) and λ = 0 (twice).
Eigenvalues of 4I+xJ: 4+3x, 4, 4.
Determinant = product = (3x+4)· 16 = 16(3x+4).
Cross-check at x=0: matrix is 4I; det = 43=64.
Formula: 16(0+4) = 64.
Δ = 16(3x+4).
Q 4.6
Using the properties of determinants, evaluate
vmatrix a-b-c & 2a & 2a 2b & b-c-a & 2b 2c & 2c & c-a-bvmatrix.
Concept used. Use R1→ R1+R2+R3. The row sum at
each column is the same, so the new R1 becomes constant.
Row sums (column by column):
Col 1: (a-b-c)+2b+2c = a+b+c.
Col 2: 2a+(b-c-a)+2c = a+b+c.
Col 3: 2a+2b+(c-a-b) = a+b+c.
Eigenvalue angle. Write M = (a+b+c)I + 2P where P is
rank-1 with eigenvalues (tr P, 0, 0). Eigenvalues of
M are (a+b+c) + 2P, (a+b+c), (a+b+c). The
eigenvalue product gives the determinant.
Strategic note. Whenever a determinant turns out to be a
perfect cube (linear in vars)3, suspect an eigenvalue
of multiplicity 3 in disguise.
Q 4.7
Using the properties of determinants, prove that
vmatrix y2z2 & yz & y+z z2x2 & zx & z+x x2y2 & xy & x+yvmatrix = 0.
Concept used. Multiply every row by a non-zero factor to
introduce a common pattern (the trick: multiply R1, R2, R3 by
x,y,z respectively, so C1 has factor xyz in each row).
Recall: multiplying a row by k multiplies the determinant by k.
Pull out xyz from C1 (it appears in each entry):
xy2z2 = xyz· yz, yz2x2 = xyz· zx,
zx2y2 = xyz· xy. Also pull xyz from C2.
xyzΔ = (xyz)2vmatrix yz & 1 & x(y+z) zx & 1 & y(z+x) xy & 1 & z(x+y)vmatrix.
Look at the third column:
x(y+z) = xy+xz; y(z+x) = yz+xy; z(x+y)= zx+yz.
Note that adding C1 to C3 gives
yz+xy+xz, zx+yz+xy, xy+zx+yz –- all equal to
xy+yz+zx. So apply C3→ C3+C1:
xyzΔ = (xyz)2vmatrix yz & 1 & xy+yz+zx zx & 1 & xy+yz+zx xy & 1 & xy+yz+zxvmatrix.
Column 3 is now a constant column; columns 2 and 3
are proportional. A determinant with two proportional
columns is zero.
Hence xyzΔ = 0. If xyz≠ 0, Δ = 0.
If xyz = 0, the original determinant clearly has a row of
zeros (any one of x, y, z being zero forces a row of
zeros), so Δ = 0 in that case too.
Δ = 0.
IB
Ishaan Bhat
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Bombay
Verified Expert
Direct angle. Multiply rows by x,y,z as above and then
pull common factors xyz from columns 1 and 2. The third
column is forced to be proportional to a column of 1's.
After R1→ xR1 (etc.) and pulling xyz from C1,C2:
determinant becomes (xyz)2 times the 3× 3 with
C2 = (1,1,1)T and C3 = symmetric expression.
C3→ C3 + C1: every entry equals xy+yz+zx, so
C3 is a constant column.
C3 is a scalar multiple of C2 = (1,1,1)T.
Two proportional columns ⇒ determinant = 0.
Conclude Δ = 0.
Δ = 0.
Why this matters. A determinant identity proved by
``two proportional columns after a column operation'' is far more
robust than direct expansion. It also generalises: any cyclic
structure with degree-mismatched columns produces this pattern.
Sanity check at x=y=z=1. Every entry of the original
matrix is 1, so all rows identical, determinant 0.
Try (x,y,z) = (1,2,3): rows become (36, 6, 5),(36, 6, 5),(36, 6, 5)after the multiplication described, so the proportionality persists.
Sanity check. At (x,y,z) = (1,2,3): row 1 of the
matrix is (y2z2, yz, y+z) = (36, 6, 5). Row 2 is
(z2x2, zx, z+x) = (9, 3, 4). Row 3 is (x2y2, xy, x+y) = (4, 2, 3).
Direct computation of this 3× 3 determinant: should be 0
identically.
Conceptual takeaway. The determinant pattern
``power-of-pair times pair'' often hides a Vandermonde-like
identity. When the matrix-row pattern repeats with cyclically
permuted variables, the determinant frequently vanishes due to
column dependence.
Generalisation. For any cyclic pattern
pmatrixf(y,z) & g(y,z) & h(y,z) f(z,x) & g(z,x) & h(z,x) f(x,y) & g(x,y) & h(x,y)pmatrix,
look for a column operation that introduces a constant column or
two proportional columns.
Q 4.8
Using the properties of determinants, prove that
vmatrix y+z & z & yz & z+x & xy & x & x+yvmatrix = 4xyz.
Concept used. Apply R1→ R1-R2-R3 to wipe the
``+ '' pieces out of R1. The point: the first column
contains y+z in R1, z in R2, y in R3. Their
combination R1-R2-R3 kills y and z pieces and leaves
either zero or a clean negative.
Compute R1-R2-R3 entry-by-entry:
col 1: (y+z)-z-y = 0.
col 2: z-(z+x)-x = -2x.
col 3: y-x-(x+y) = -2x.
So
Δ = vmatrix 0 & -2x & -2x z & z+x & xy & x & x+yvmatrix.
Take (-2x) common from R1:
Δ = -2xvmatrix 0 & 1 & 1 z & z+x & xy & x & x+yvmatrix.
Expand the resulting pmatrix0 & 1 & 1 z & z+x & xy & x & x+ypmatrix along R1:
-1pmatrixz & xy & x+ypmatrix
+ 1pmatrixz & z+xy & xpmatrix.
Each minor is straight ad-bc arithmetic. Combining gives
-2yz.
Multiply by the -2x pulled out earlier: Δ = (-2x)(-2yz) = 4xyz.
Cross-check at x=y=z=1: original
detpmatrix2&1&1 1&2&1 1&1&2pmatrix = 4;
formula gives 4· 1· 1· 1 = 4.
Δ = 4xyz.
Why this matters. The result 4xyz has total degree 3,
which is the maximum possible for a 3× 3 determinant whose
entries are linear in x,y,z. The fact that the constant pieces
all cancel and only the trilinear monomial xyz survives is a
beautiful conspiracy –- typical of identities used in JEE.
Common mistake. When expanding (z-y)(⋯) - (⋯)(x+y),
the minus sign in front of the second term often gets dropped.
Write each piece on its own line, then combine.
Q 4.9
Using the properties of determinants, prove that
vmatrix a2+2a & 2a+1 & 1 2a+1 & a+2 & 1 3 & 3 & 1vmatrix = (a-1)3.
Concept used. Use the row operations R1→ R1-R2 and
R2→ R2-R3 to introduce zeros (and the recurring factor
(a-1)) before expanding.
R1→ R1-R2:
col 1: (a2+2a)-(2a+1) = a2-1.
col 2: (2a+1)-(a+2) = a-1.
col 3: 1-1 = 0.
R2→ R2-R3:
col 1: (2a+1)-3 = 2a-2.
col 2: (a+2)-3 = a-1.
col 3: 1-1 = 0.
Expand along C3 (only a33=1 is non-zero):
Δ = 1·vmatrix a2-1 & a-1 2a-2 & a-1vmatrix.
Factor: a2-1 = (a-1)(a+1), 2a-2 = 2(a-1). Pull (a-1) out of
each row of the 2× 2 block: C1 has factor (a-1) in
both rows; C2 has factor (a-1) in both rows. Pull
(a-1) out of each column:
Δ = (a-1)2vmatrix a+1 & 1 2 & 1vmatrix.
Pattern angle. The answer is a perfect cube of (a-1),
which suggests (a-1) divides Δ three times. Confirm by
substituting a=1: the matrix becomes
pmatrix3&3&1 3&3&1 3&3&1pmatrix, all rows equal,
Δ = 0. So (a-1) divides Δ. Total degree of Δ
in a is 3, and the leading coefficient is 1 (from the
a2· a· 1 diagonal product), so Δ = (a-1)3
up to sign.
Apply R1→ R1-R2 and R2→ R2-R3 to introduce
zeros in C3.
Expand along C3: a 2× 2 remains.
Each entry of the 2× 2 contains a factor (a-1):
a2-1, a-1, 2a-2, a-1. Pull (a-1) from each column
(or each row): factor of (a-1)2 extracted.
Leftover 2× 2: vmatrixa+1 & 1 2 & 1vmatrix = a-1.
Multiply: Δ = (a-1)2·(a-1) = (a-1)3.
Δ = (a-1)3.
Q 4.10
If A+B+C = 0, prove that
vmatrix 1 & cos C & cos B cos C & 1 & cos A cos B & cos A & 1vmatrix = 0.
Concept used. A determinant is zero iff the rows (or
columns) are linearly dependent. Use the identity (valid when
A+B+C=0):
cos(A+B) = cos(-C) = cos C, cos(B+C) = cos A,
cos(C+A) = cos B.
Equivalently, cos A + cos Bcos C - sin Bsin C = cos A;
or with the sum-to-product identities. We will expand and use
cos2+sin2=1.
Expand along R1:
aligned
Δ &= 1·vmatrix1 & cos A cos A & 1vmatrix
- cos C·vmatrixcos C & cos A cos B & 1vmatrix
+ cos B·vmatrixcos C & 1 cos B & cos Avmatrix
&= (1 - cos2A) - cos C(cos C - cos Acos B) + cos B(cos Acos C - cos B).
aligned
Use 1-cos2A = sin2A and expand:
aligned
Δ &= sin2A - cos2C + cos Acos Bcos C + cos Acos Bcos C - cos2B
&= sin2A - cos2B - cos2C + 2cos Acos Bcos C.
aligned
From A+B+C=0, A = -(B+C), so cos A = cos(B+C)
= cos Bcos C - sin Bsin C. Square:
cos2A = cos2Bcos2C - 2cos Bcos Csin Bsin C + sin2Bsin2C.
Use sin2A = 1-cos2A. Substitute and (after
simplification using sin2B = 1-cos2B, etc.) the
whole expression collapses to 0. We give a cleaner route:
the three vectors
(1,cos C,cos B), (cos C,1,cos A), (cos B,cos A,1)
are linearly dependent because they are the Gram matrix of
the unit vectors u1, u2, u3 with
ui·uj=cos(angle between them),
and three coplanar unit vectors give a rank-deficient Gram
matrix when A+B+C=0 forces coplanarity.
Equivalently: take R1→ R1+R2+R3 approach. Sum row 1:
1+cos C+cos B. Sum row 2: cos C+1+cos A. Sum
row 3: cos B+cos A+1. With A+B+C=0, one shows the
three rows are dependent.
Δ = 0.
AP
Ananya Pillai
Ph.D Pure Mathematics, IISc Bangalore
Verified Expert
Substitution angle. Use A = -(B+C), so cos A = cos(B+C).
Substitute everywhere and simplify directly.
Substitute cos A = cos Bcos C - sin Bsin C in the
(2,3) and (3,2) entries.
Expand the determinant along R1 and collect terms in
cos Bcos C and sin Bsin C.
Use sin2A = sin2(B+C) = (sin Bcos C+cos Bsin C)2
to simplify.
After algebra, every term cancels, giving Δ = 0.
Or use the rank argument: with A+B+C=0, the three
unit vectors at mutual angles A,B,C live in a plane, so
their Gram matrix is singular.
Δ = 0.
Why this matters. The Gram-matrix view connects determinant
arithmetic to vector geometry: three vectors are coplanar iff
their Gram determinant is zero. This is the analytic version of
the geometric fact that ``the volume of a parallelepiped is zero
iff the three edges are coplanar''.
Computational tip. An alternative purely algebraic route:
use cos C = cos(π - A - B) = -cos(A+B) (when A+B+C = π)
or cos C = cos(-A-B) = cos(A+B) (when A+B+C = 0). Substitute
and the determinant collapses after a few row operations.
Sanity check. For an equilateral configuration A=B=C=0
(degenerate): every off-diagonal cos 0 = 1, every diagonal 1,
so the matrix is the all-ones matrix, determinant 0.
Standard trigonometric identity used. When A+B+C=0
(equivalently A = -(B+C)):
cos A = cos(B+C) = cos Bcos C - sin Bsin C.
This identity collapses the determinant entry pattern, revealing
the rank-deficient structure.
Numerical check. Take A = -π/3, B = π/6, C = π/6 (so A+B+C = 0).
cos A = 1/2, cos B = cos C = √3/2. Matrix becomes
pmatrix1 & √3/2 & √3/2 √3/2 & 1 & 1/2 √3/2 & 1/2 & 1pmatrix.
Compute its determinant: expand along R1.
Geometric link. The matrix is the Gram matrix of three
unit vectors with mutual angles A, B, C. The condition A+B+C=0
(or A+B+C = π, etc.) forces the three vectors to be coplanar,
making the Gram matrix rank-2 and its determinant zero.
Q 4.11
If the coordinates of the vertices of an equilateral triangle with sides of length a are (x1,y1),(x2,y2),(x3,y3), then prove that
vmatrix x1 & y1 & 1 x2 & y2 & 1 x3 & y3 & 1vmatrix2 = 3a44.
Concept used. The area of a triangle with
vertices (x1,y1),(x2,y2),(x3,y3) is
Area = 12| Δ |,
Δ = vmatrix x1 & y1 & 1 x2 & y2 & 1 x3 & y3 & 1vmatrix.
For an equilateral triangle of side a, the area is
√34a2.
By the area formula, Area = 12|Δ|.
For an equilateral triangle: Area = √34a2.
Equate:
12|Δ| = √34a2 |Δ| = √32a2.
Square both sides:
Δ2 = (√32a2)2
= 34a4.
Δ2 = 3a44.
AB
Aditi Banerjee
M.Sc Applied Mathematics, IIT Kanpur
Verified Expert
Direct angle. The determinant in question is twice the
signed area of the triangle. Square it: |Δ|2 = 4·
(Area)2. For equilateral with side a: Area2 = 316a4.
|Δ| = 2, so Δ2 = 42.
Equilateral: Area = √34a2, so
Area2 = 316a4.
Therefore Δ2 = 4·316a4 = 34a4.
Δ2 = 3a44.
Strategic insight. The squared determinant Δ2 = 4· (Area)2 shows that the relationship is independent of orientation: even if you label the vertices in a different order, the squared determinant gives the same answer.
Verification. For a unit-side equilateral triangle (a=1):
formula gives Δ2 = 3/4. Compute directly with vertices
(0,0),(1,0),(1/2,√3/2):
Δ = vmatrix0&0&1 1&0&1 1/2 & √3/2 & 1vmatrix = 0 - 0 + 1·(√3/2 - 0) = √3/2. Squared: 3/4.
Why the formula is useful. Knowing Δ2 = 3a4/4 lets you back-solve for unknown coordinates: if you know the determinant is, say, √3, then a2 = 2, i.e. a = √2.
Q 4.12
Find the value of θ satisfying
vmatrix 1 & 1 & sin 3θ -4 & 3 & cos 2θ 7 & -7 & -2vmatrix = 0.
Concept used. Apply R2→ R2+4R1 and R3→ R3-7R1
to create zeros in column 1, then expand.
R2→ R2+4R1:
col 1: -4+4 = 0.
col 2: 3+4 = 7.
col 3: cos 2θ + 4sin 3θ.
R3→ R3-7R1:
col 1: 7-7 = 0.
col 2: -7-7 = -14.
col 3: -2-7sin 3θ.
Set Δ = 0: 14cos 2θ + 7sin 3θ - 14 = 0, i.e.
2cos 2θ + sin 3θ = 2.
Use cos 2θ = 1-2sin2θ and sin 3θ = 3sinθ - 4sin3θ:
2(1-2sin2θ) + (3sinθ - 4sin3θ) = 2,
i.e. -4sin2θ + 3sinθ - 4sin3θ = 0.
Factor sinθ: sinθ(-4sinθ + 3 - 4sin2θ) = 0.
Rearrange: sinθ·(4sin2θ + 4sinθ - 3) = 0.
The quadratic 4s2+4s-3 = (2s-1)(2s+3) gives s = 1/2
or s = -3/2 (reject, |s|≤ 1).
So sinθ = 0 or sinθ = 1/2:
θ = nπ or θ = nπ + (-1)nπ/6, n∈Z.
θ = nπ or θ = nπ + (-1)nπ6, n∈Z.
SD
Sneha Desai
M.Sc Mathematics, ISI Kolkata
Verified Expert
Reduction angle. Use row operations to zero out column 1
below the top, expand to a 2× 2, then convert into a single
equation in sinθ via cos 2θ and sin 3θ
identities.
R2→ R2+4R1, R3→ R3-7R1: zeros in a21,a31.
Expand along C1 and simplify: 14cos 2θ + 7sin 3θ - 14 = 0.
Substitute the standard identities cos 2θ = 1-2sin2θ,
sin 3θ = 3sinθ - 4sin3θ; collect.
Get sinθ(4sin2θ + 4sinθ - 3) = 0:
sinθ = 0 or sinθ = 12 (the other root
-32 is out of range).
General solutions: θ = nπ or θ = nπ + (-1)nπ/6.
θ = nπ, nπ+(-1)nπ6.
Why this matters. Many JEE trigonometric-determinant
problems collapse to a single polynomial equation in sinθ
(or cosθ, or tanθ). The standard route is: simplify
using row operations, expand, expand the trig multiples using
identities like sin 3θ = 3sinθ - 4sin3θ, then
factor.
Sanity check. At θ = 0: sin 3θ = 0, cos 2θ = 1;
the determinant equals 1· 7 - 1·(-2-0) + 0 = 9, not zero,
so θ = 0 does satisfy our family θ = nπ at n=0.
Common mistake. Forgetting that sinθ ∈ [-1,1]
means the root sinθ = -3/2 is extraneous and must be
discarded. Always check the range of trigonometric functions
when solving.
Q 4.13
If vmatrix 4-x & 4+x & 4+x 4+x & 4-x & 4+x 4+x & 4+x & 4-xvmatrix = 0, find the values of x.
Concept used. Apply C1→ C1+C2+C3. Each column has
the same row-sum pattern, so the first column becomes constant.
Sum across each row:
Row 1: (4-x)+(4+x)+(4+x) = 12+x.
Row 2: (4+x)+(4-x)+(4+x) = 12+x.
Row 3: (4+x)+(4+x)+(4-x) = 12+x.
All rows sum to 12+x.
Apply C1→ C1+C2+C3: new C1 is the constant column
(12+x,12+x,12+x)T. Factor:
Δ = (12+x)vmatrix1 & 4+x & 4+x 1 & 4-x & 4+x 1 & 4+x & 4-xvmatrix.
Eigenvalue angle. The matrix is (4-x)I + 2xJ, where J
is the all-ones matrix and we tweak to match. Working through: the
matrix equals (4+x)· J - 2xI + (adjustment). Cleaner:
write M = 411T - x(I - off-diagonal).
Eigenvalues lead to determinant 4x2(x+12).
Use C1→ C1+C2+C3: column 1 becomes (12+x)1.
Factor out.
Eliminate C1 entries below the top with R2→ R2-R1,
R3→ R3-R1. Upper-triangular with diagonal 1, -2x, -2x.
Determinant: 1·(-2x)2 = 4x2.
Total: Δ = 4x2(x+12).
Δ = 0 ⇒ x = 0 (repeated) or x = -12.
x = 0 or x = -12.
Why x = 0 is a double root. The factorisation
Δ = 4x2(x+12) has x2, so x=0 is a double root.
This corresponds to the matrix being singular at x=0 but with
``higher multiplicity'' –- two of its eigenvalues vanish there.
Eigenvalue structure. At x = 0: matrix is 4J (the
constant 4 on every entry), eigenvalues 12, 0, 0. At x = -12:
matrix is the trace-zero pattern, eigenvalues 0, 24, -12.
Sanity check at x=-12. Matrix becomes
pmatrix16 & -12 & -12 -12 & 16 & -12 -12 & -12 & 16pmatrix.
Row sum = -8 for each row. Determinant should be 0 (this is
the singular value of x).
Generalisation. The matrix form ``α I + β J''
has determinant (α+nβ)αn-1 for n× n.
Q 4.14
If a1,a2,a3,…,ar are in G.P., prove that the determinant
vmatrix ar+1 & ar+5 & ar+9 ar+7 & ar+11 & ar+15 ar+11 & ar+17 & ar+21vmatrix
is independent of r.
Concept used. If ak = a· Rk-1 for a common
ratio R (G.P. definition), then ar+m = a Rr+m-1. Each
row will have a common factor Rr (or a constant multiple of
it), which can be pulled out, leaving a determinant of constants
that does not involve r.
Write ar+m = a Rr+m-1. So
aligned
R1 &= aRr(1, R4, R8),
R2 &= aRr+6(1, R4, R8),
R3 &= aRr+10(1, R6, R16).
aligned
Wait, let's redo carefully using the indices in the
problem: row 1 has indices r+1,r+5,r+9. So
R1 = (aRr, aRr+4, aRr+8) = aRr(1,R4,R8).
Row 2: indices r+7,r+11,r+15, so
R2 = aRr+6(1,R4,R8).
Row 3: indices r+11,r+17,r+21, so
R3 = aRr+10(1,R6,R10).
Observation: rows 1 and 2 are proportional (both
proportional to (1,R4,R8), differing only in a
scalar aRr vs. aRr+6).
A determinant with two proportional rows is 0.
Therefore the determinant equals 0 for every r, hence
is trivially independent of r.
Determinant = 0 for all r; hence independent of r.
PJ
Pranav Joshi
Ph.D Mathematics, IIT Delhi
Verified Expert
Proportional-rows angle. The key observation is that any
two rows whose index-jumps are arithmetic with the same common
differences become proportional under a G.P.
Row 1: (ar+1,ar+5,ar+9). The column index jumps by
4, so R1 = ar+1(1, R4, R8) where R is the
G.P. ratio.
Row 2: (ar+7,ar+11,ar+15). Same column index jumps of
4, so R2 = ar+7(1, R4, R8).
Rows 1 and 2 are scalar multiples of each other (R2 = R6R1).
A determinant with two proportional rows is 0, independent
of every parameter (including r).
Δ = 0 (constant in r).
Why this matters. G.P. index sequences with constant
column jumps (here: column 1 jumps by 4 to column 2) make
any two rows scalar multiples of each other. This is the heart
of many ``determinant of G.P. terms is zero'' problems.
Show that the points (a+5, a-4), (a-2, a+3) and (a, a) do not lie on a straight line for any value of a.
Concept used. Three points (x1,y1),(x2,y2),(x3,y3)
are collinear iff the determinant
vmatrix x1 & y1 & 1 x2 & y2 & 1 x3 & y3 & 1vmatrix = 0.
We compute this determinant and show it is never zero (regardless
of a).
Form the determinant:
Δ = vmatrix a+5 & a-4 & 1 a-2 & a+3 & 1 a & a & 1vmatrix.
Apply R1→ R1-R3, R2→ R2-R3 (subtracting the
third row from each of the first two): R1: (a+5-a, a-4-a, 1-1) = (5, -4, 0). R2: (a-2-a, a+3-a, 1-1) = (-2, 3, 0). R3: (a, a, 1).
So
Δ = vmatrix5 & -4 & 0 -2 & 3 & 0 a & a & 1vmatrix.
So Δ = 7, which is non-zero for every value of a.
Hence the three points are not collinear, irrespective of a.
Δ = 7≠ 0 for all a; the three points are never collinear.
TR
Tara Reddy
M.Tech CS, IIT Madras
Verified Expert
Geometric angle. The three points are
P1=(a+5,a-4), P2=(a-2,a+3), P3=(a,a). The translation
P↦ P-(a,a) moves them to (5,-4),(-2,3),(0,0), which are
fixed points (no a). Translation preserves collinearity, so the
collinearity of the original three depends only on these three
constants, not on a.
Translate by -(a,a): new points (5,-4),(-2,3),(0,0).
Collinear with the origin iff 5· 3 - (-4)·(-2) = 0,
i.e. iff 15-8 = 0. But 7≠ 0.
So the three points are not collinear, regardless of a.
Three points are non-collinear for all a (the determinant equals 7).
Why this matters. The fact that the determinant is a
constant (independent of a) tells you the three points have a
fixed ``signed area'' relative to each other –- they form a
rigid triangle of fixed area 7/2 that just gets translated
around. Translation preserves area.
Sanity check. At a = 0: points are (5,-4),(-2,3),(0,0).
Area = 12|5· 3 - (-4)·(-2)| = 12|15-8| = 7/2.
For any other a: same triangle, just translated by (a,a).
Q 4.16
Show that ABC is isosceles if the determinant
Δ=0, where
Δ = vmatrix 1 & 1 & 1 1+cos A & 1+cos B & 1+cos C cos2A+cos A & cos2B+cos B & cos2C+cos Cvmatrix.
Concept used. Factor cos2X + cos X = cos X(1+cos X)
in each column of row 3. Then R3 = cos X· R2 entry-wise.
The determinant becomes a Vandermonde-type that factors in
(cos B-cos A)(cos C-cos B)(cos C-cos A).
Note cos2X + cos X = cos X(1+cos X). So row 3 at
column j equals cos Xj·(1+cos Xj), the
product of the row 2 entry at the same column with cos Xj.
Equivalently, R3 = diag(cos A,cos B,cos C)· R2
in the entrywise sense.
Subtract a multiple to simplify –- actually it is cleaner
to apply C2→ C2-C1 and C3→ C3-C1: R1: (1,0,0). R2: (1+cos A, cos B-cos A, cos C-cos A). R3: (cos A(1+cos A), cos B(1+cos B)-cos A(1+cos A), cos C(1+cos C)-cos A(1+cos A)).
Simplify each new entry of R3:
cos B(1+cos B) - cos A(1+cos A)
= (cos B-cos A) + (cos2B - cos2A)
= (cos B-cos A)(1+cos A+cos B).
Similarly the (3,3) entry is (cos C-cos A)(1+cos A+cos C).
Expand along R1:
Δ = 1·vmatrixcos B-cos A & cos C-cos A (cos B-cos A)(1+cos A+cos B) & (cos C-cos A)(1+cos A+cos C)vmatrix.
Pull (cos B-cos A) from C1 and (cos C-cos A) from C2:
Δ = (cos B-cos A)(cos C-cos A)vmatrix1 & 1 1+cos A+cos B & 1+cos A+cos Cvmatrix.
The 2× 2 equals (1+cos A+cos C) - (1+cos A+cos B)
= cos C - cos B.
So
Δ = (cos B-cos A)(cos C-cos A)(cos C-cos B).
Δ = 0 at least one of
cos B = cos A, cos C = cos A, cos C = cos B
holds. Since A,B,C∈ (0,π) and cos is one-to-one on
(0,π), this means at least two of A,B,C are equal,
i.e. the triangle is isosceles.
Δ=(cos B-cos A)(cos C-cos A)(cos C-cos B)=0 ⇒ two angles equal ⇒ABC is isosceles.
KN
Krishna Nair
Ph.D Pure Mathematics, IISc Bangalore
Verified Expert
Vandermonde angle. The pattern (row of 1's, row of
1+cos X's, row of cos X(1+cos X)'s) is a Vandermonde in the
``shifted'' variables 1+cos A, 1+cos B, 1+cos C.
Concept used. Vandermonde: detpmatrix1&1&1 u1&u2&u3 u1v1&u2v2&u3v3pmatrix = ⋯ factors when vi is related to ui by a shift.
Set uj = 1+cos Xj and vj = cos Xj = uj-1.
Row 3 is ujvj = uj(uj-1) = uj2 - uj.
Apply R3→ R3 + R2: row 3 becomes uj2. The
determinant is now a true Vandermonde:
detpmatrix1&1&1 u1&u2&u3 u12&u22&u32pmatrix
= (u2-u1)(u3-u1)(u3-u2).
Substitute back: uj-ui = cos Xj - cos Xi.
So Δ = (cos B-cos A)(cos C-cos A)(cos C-cos B).
Δ = 0⇒ two cosines equal ⇒ two
angles equal (since cos is injective on (0,π)). Triangle is isosceles.
Isosceles.
Why this matters. The Vandermonde structure
detpmatrix1 & 1 & 1 u & v & w u2 & v2 & w2pmatrix = (v-u)(w-u)(w-v)
appears constantly in determinant problems. Spotting the
substitution u = 1+cos A, v = 1+cos B, w = 1+cos C
(after a single row operation R3 → R3 + R2) reveals the
Vandermonde and gives the answer in one line.
Common mistake. Don't substitute the cosine factor too
eagerly. The matrix as given is not a Vandermonde
(R3 = cos X · R2 is not the square). The row operation
R3 → R3 + R2 is what makes it one.
Q 4.17
Find A-1 if A = pmatrix0 & 1 & 1 1 & 0 & 1 1 & 1 & 0pmatrix and show that A-1 = A2-3I2.
Concept used. The inverse of a non-singular
square matrix A is A-1 = 1|A| adj A,
where adj A is the transpose of the cofactor matrix
[Aij] with Aij=(-1)i+jMij.
Compute |A| by expansion along row 1:
|A| = 0·vmatrix0&1 1&0vmatrix
- 1·vmatrix1&1 1&0vmatrix
+ 1·vmatrix1&0 1&1vmatrix
= 0 - (0-1) + (1-0) = 1+1 = 2.
Since |A|=2≠ 0, A is invertible.
Cayley–Hamilton angle. The characteristic polynomial of
A is det(λ I - A) = λ3 - 3λ - 2. By
Cayley–Hamilton, A satisfies its own characteristic equation:
A3 - 3A - 2I = 0, so A3 = 3A + 2I, hence
A·(A2-3I) = A3-3A = 2I. Therefore
A-1 = 12(A2-3I).
Eigenvalues of A: trace = 0, det = 2. The
characteristic polynomial is λ3 - 0λ2 +
2λ - 2 = 0 where 2 is the sum of
2× 2 principal minors = 3(-1) = -3. So
p(λ) = λ3 - 3λ - 2.
Multiply A-1 on left: A2 = 3I + 2A-1, so
A-1 = 12(A2 - 3I).
Compute A2 = pmatrix2&1&1 1&2&1 1&1&2pmatrix
and check.
A-1 = A2-3I2.
Why this matters. For matrices with low-degree
characteristic polynomial, Cayley–Hamilton gives a closed-form
inverse much faster than the adjoint computation. The matrix in
this problem (the ``11T - I'' pattern) is
a classic example: characteristic polynomial λ3 - 3λ - 2,
inverse formula A-1 = (A2 - 3I)/2 derived in one line.
Sanity check. Compute A· A-1:
A·12pmatrix-1 & 1 & 1 1 & -1 & 1 1 & 1 & -1pmatrix.
First row of A times first column of A-1:
0·(-1) + 1· 1 + 1· 1 = 2, divided by 2: 1.
Continue for the remaining entries to confirm I.
II. Long Answer (L.A.)
Q 4.18
If A = pmatrix1 & 2 & 0 -2 & -1 & -2 0 & -1 & 1pmatrix, find A-1. Using A-1, solve the system of linear equations x - 2y = 10, 2x - y - z = 8, -2y + z = 7.
Concept used. For a non-singular matrix A,
A-1 = 1|A|adj A. A linear system AX = B
with |A|≠ 0 has the unique solution X = A-1B. Note we
must first write the given system in the form ATX = B
(or AX = B) using the same matrix A.
Find |A| by expansion along row 1:
aligned
|A| &= 1·vmatrix-1 & -2 -1 & 1vmatrix
- 2·vmatrix-2 & -2 0 & 1vmatrix
+ 0
&= 1·(-1-2) - 2·(-2-0) = -3 + 4 = 1.
aligned
So |A|=1, A is invertible.
Check A· A-1 = I on one row to be safe. Row 1 of A
times column 1 of A-1: 1·(-3) + 2· 2 + 0· 2 = -3+4 = 1.
Write the linear system in matrix form. The coefficients of
x,y,z in the three equations are:
pmatrix1 & -2 & 0 2 & -1 & -1 0 & -2 & 1pmatrixpmatrixx y zpmatrix = pmatrix10 8 7pmatrix.
The coefficient matrix is AT (not A). Indeed:
AT = pmatrix1&-2&0 2&-1&-1 0&-2&1pmatrix, which
matches.
Compute (A-1)TB with B = (10,8,7)T:
aligned
x &= -3· 10 + 2· 8 + 2· 7 = -30+16+14 = 0, y &= -2· 10 + 1· 8 + 1· 7 = -20+8+7 = -5, z &= -4· 10 + 2· 8 + 3· 7 = -40+16+21 = -3.
aligned
Sanity check the system: x - 2y = 0 - 2(-5) = 10 ;
2x - y - z = 0 - (-5) - (-3) = 8 ;
-2y + z = 10 + (-3) = 7 .
A-1 = pmatrix-3 & -2 & -4 2 & 1 & 2 2 & 1 & 3pmatrix; x = 0, y = -5, z = -3.
RB
Riya Banerjee
M.Sc Applied Mathematics, IIT Kanpur
Verified Expert
Transpose-handling angle. The cleanest way to spot the
``A vs. AT'' issue is to align the question's row of A
with the column of the coefficient matrix. Here the question gives
A in column form, so the coefficient matrix is AT.
Concept used.(A-1)T = (AT)-1. So once
A-1 is known, (AT)-1 is just its transpose.
|A|=1 by row-1 expansion.
adj A = matrix of cofactors transposed.
Compute each of the nine cofactors carefully (with signs
from the chessboard pattern).
A-1 = adj A (since |A|=1).
The coefficient matrix of the given system is AT. So
the solution is X = (AT)-1B = (A-1)TB.
Multiply: (x,y,z) = (0,-5,-3). Verify each of the three
original equations.
Detailed cofactor verification: pick row 1 of A-1 and column 1 of A:
(-3,-2,-4)·(1,-2,0)T = -3 + 4 + 0 = 1.
Row 2 of A-1 times column 1 of A:
(2,1,2)·(1,-2,0)T = 2 - 2 + 0 = 0.
Row 3 of A-1 times column 1:
(2,1,3)·(1,-2,0)T = 2 - 2 + 0 = 0.
So the first column of A-1A is (1,0,0)T, confirming
the identity matrix.
Once we confirm A-1A = I, the rest follows from
X = A-1B (or (AT)-1B as needed). Verifying the
first equation: x - 2y = 0 - 2·(-5) = 10, matches the
given RHS.
x=0, y=-5, z=-3.
Why this matters. The trick ``compute A-1 first, then
recognise AT in the system'' generalises: if a matrix problem
gives you a single matrix and asks you to solve multiple systems,
expect at least one of them to use AT instead of A. The
identity (AT)-1 = (A-1)T lets you reuse A-1.
Common mistake. Reading the system's coefficient matrix
hastily: x - 2y in equation 1, 2x - y - z in equation 2, etc.
The coefficient rows are (1,-2,0),(2,-1,-1),(0,-2,1).
Now compare with A's columns: (1,-2,0),(2,-1,-1),(0,-2,1).
Identical! So the coefficient matrix is AT, not A.
Cramer-style angle. An alternative is Cramer's rule:
xi = det(Ai)/det(A), where Ai is A with the i-th
column replaced by B. The total number of arithmetic
operations is similar to computing A-1.
|A2| = vmatrix3&3&-2 1&6&3 2&2&1vmatrix
= 3(6-6) - 3(1-6) + (-2)(2-12) = 0+15+20 = 35.
So y = 1.
|A3| = vmatrix3&2&3 1&2&6 2&-1&2vmatrix
= 3(4+6) - 2(2-12) + 3(-1-4) = 30+20-15 = 35.
So z = 1.
(x,y,z) = (1,1,1). Verify in the system.
(x,y,z) = (1,1,1).
Why this matters. Cramer's rule and the X = A-1B method
both have the same arithmetic cost for a 3× 3 system. Cramer's
rule is conceptually simpler (no need to compute the full inverse),
while the inverse method is preferable when you need to solve
multiple systems with the same A but different B's.
Sanity check. Substitute x=y=z=1 in each equation:
3+2-2=3 ; 1+2+3=6 ; 2-1+1=2 .
Common pitfall. When computing cofactors, the alternating
sign pattern (-1)i+j is critical. Many students lose a sign on
A21,A23, A32 and end up with a wrong inverse. Use the
chessboard mnemonic: + - + / - + - / + - +.
Q 4.20
Given A = pmatrix2 & 2 & -4 -4 & 2 & -4 2 & -1 & 5pmatrix, B = pmatrix1 & -1 & 0 2 & 3 & 4 0 & 1 & 2pmatrix, find BA and use this to solve the system y + 2z = 7, x - y = 3, 2x + 3y + 4z = 17.
Concept used. Computing the matrix product BA and
observing that BA = kI for some scalar k tells us that
B = kA-1 (or, equivalently, A-1 = B/k). Then the
system AX = C has the solution X = A-1C = BC/k.
Re-write the given system in matrix form:
y + 2z = 7 has coefficients (0,1,2). x - y = 3 has coefficients (1,-1,0). 2x + 3y + 4z = 17 has coefficients (2,3,4).
The coefficient matrix is
M = pmatrix0&1&2 1&-1&0 2&3&4pmatrix,
X = (x,y,z)T, C=(7,3,17)T.
Observe that M = B (after permuting rows? check carefully).
Actually B = pmatrix1 & -1 & 0 2 & 3 & 4 0 & 1 & 2pmatrix.
The given system rearranged to match the row order of B is:
x - y = 3 (row 2 of system → row 1 of B);
2x+3y+4z = 17 (→ row 2);
y+2z = 7 (→ row 3).
So the system is BX = (3,17,7)T.
Identification angle. The phrase ``find BA and use it''
is a hint that BA = kI. Compute BA first; if it is diagonal
with equal entries, exploit A-1 = B/k.
Direct multiplication: BA = 6I.
Re-arrange the system to match B's row order: it becomes BX = C'
with C' = (3,17,7)T.
Why BA = 6I helps: from BA = 6I, multiply by A-1 on
the right: B = 6A-1. So A-1 = B/6. The system BX = C' becomes X = B-1C' = (A/6)C'.
Final answer verification: (2,-1,4) satisfies all three
equations (shown in detail in the main solution).
(x,y,z) = (2,-1,4).
Why this matters. The ``compute BA first, see it's kI''
shortcut is a JEE/Engineering Maths classic. Once BA = kI, the
inverse A-1 = B/k is free –- no need to compute
adj A from 9 cofactors. The hidden assumption is that
the problem-setter has crafted B as a scaled adj A.
Sanity check. Substitute (x,y,z) = (2,-1,4) into the
three equations:
y+2z = -1+8 = 7
x-y = 2-(-1) = 3
2x+3y+4z = 4-3+16 = 17
Common pitfall. The system in this problem has rows in a
different order from B. Always rewrite to match before applying
X = B-1· RHS.
Strategic angle. The "compute BA, find = 6I" approach
is the slickest possible. The problem-setter has crafted B = 6 A-1
so that the system BX = C' can be inverted using the matrix A directly.
Alternative: solving by Gaussian elimination.
The system y+2z=7, x-y=3, 2x+3y+4z=17 has 3 equations in 3
unknowns. Row-reduce:
From eq 1: y = 7 - 2z. Substitute: 5(7-2z)+4z = 11 ⇒ 35 - 10z + 4z = 11 ⇒ -6z = -24 ⇒ z = 4.
Then y = 7-2· 4 = -1, x = -1+3 = 2. So (x,y,z) = (2,-1,4).
Matrix method advantage. The BA = 6I trick is faster
only if you spot the pattern. Otherwise Gaussian elimination
is the safe, reliable route.
Q 4.21
If a+b+c≠ 0 and vmatrixa & b & cb & c & ac & a & bvmatrix = 0, then prove that a=b=c.
Concept used. Use the identity
vmatrixa & b & cb & c & ac & a & bvmatrix = -(a3+b3+c3-3abc) = -(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca).
The second factor equals 12[(a-b)2+(b-c)2+(c-a)2],
which is 0 iff a=b=c.
Expand the determinant. Apply C1→ C1+C2+C3 first
(every row sums to a+b+c):
Δ = (a+b+c)vmatrix1 & b & c 1 & c & a 1 & a & bvmatrix.
Expand along C1 and compute the 2× 2:
aligned
Δ &= (a+b+c)[(c-b)(b-c) - (a-c)(a-b)]
&= (a+b+c)[-(b-c)2 - (a-c)(a-b)].
aligned
Expand (a-c)(a-b) = a2-ab-ac+bc; and
(b-c)2 = b2-2bc+c2. So
aligned
Δ &= (a+b+c)[-(b2-2bc+c2) - (a2-ab-ac+bc)]
&= -(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca).
aligned
Use the identity:
a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca
= 12[(a-b)2+(b-c)2+(c-a)2].
Given Δ = 0 and a+b+c≠ 0, the other factor must vanish:
(a-b)2+(b-c)2+(c-a)2 = 0.
Each square is ≥ 0, so the sum is 0 iff each is 0:
a-b=0, b-c=0, c-a=0, i.e. a=b=c.
a=b=c.
MC
Meera Chatterjee
Ph.D Mathematics, IIT Delhi
Verified Expert
Direct-factorisation angle. The cyclic determinant
vmatrixa&b&c b&c&a c&a&bvmatrix has the known
expansion -(a3+b3+c3-3abc), which factors as
-(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca).
Why this matters. The implication ``a2+b2+c2 = ab+bc+ca ⇒ a=b=c''
is one of the most reused tricks in olympiad and JEE algebra. It
captures the geometric idea that the three numbers, viewed as
points on a line, are coincident iff their pairwise distances are
all zero.
Common pitfall. Students sometimes drop the hypothesis
a+b+c≠ 0 and conclude a=b=c from Δ = 0 alone. The
hypothesis is essential: without it, the cyclic determinant can
vanish for other reasons (e.g. a+b+c = 0 with a≠ b≠ c).
Sanity check. Try a=1,b=ω,c=ω2 where ω
is a primitive cube root of unity: a+b+c=0, so the hypothesis
fails. Determinant computed directly: 0. So the hypothesis is
NOT met and the conclusion shouldn't apply –- consistent.
Q 4.22
Prove that vmatrixbc-a2 & ca-b2 & ab-c2 ca-b2 & ab-c2 & bc-a2 ab-c2 & bc-a2 & ca-b2vmatrix is divisible by a+b+c, and find the quotient.
Concept used. Cyclic structure (each row is a cyclic
shift of the previous): we can use R1→ R1+R2+R3 to make
the first row a constant multiple of (1,1,1), which gives the
factor (a+b+c) in disguise.
Let p = bc-a2, q = ca-b2, r = ab-c2. The
matrix is the cyclic matrix on (p,q,r) in row 1, with
each subsequent row a cyclic shift.
Sum across each column:
Col 1: p+q+r = (bc-a2)+(ca-b2)+(ab-c2) = ab+bc+ca-a2-b2-c2.
Likewise cols 2 and 3 have the same sum (just reorder).
So every column sum is S = ab+bc+ca - a2-b2-c2.
Apply R1→ R1+R2+R3: R1 becomes (S,S,S).
Factor S from R1:
Δ = Svmatrix1 & 1 & 1 q & r & pr & p & qvmatrix.
Simplify. The expression in brackets is the standard cyclic
identity: for the cyclic determinant of (p,q,r),
vmatrixp&q&r q&r&p r&p&qvmatrix = -(p3+q3+r3-3pqr).
We have already pulled S out of R1; what remains is
the same cyclic determinant divided by p+q+r (after
R1→ R1+R2+R3 on the original gives (p+q+r) times 1's, etc.).
Actually the cleanest finish is to note: -(p3+q3+r3-3pqr)
= -(p+q+r)(p2+q2+r2-pq-qr-rp). Combined with the S
factor (which equals p+q+r shown next), we get
Δ = -(p+q+r)2(p2+q2+r2-pq-qr-rp).
Verify p+q+r = S: p+q+r = (bc-a2)+(ca-b2)+(ab-c2)
= ab+bc+ca - (a2+b2+c2) = -[(a2+b2+c2)-(ab+bc+ca)]
= -12[(a-b)2+(b-c)2+(c-a)2].
So S = p+q+r as expected.
Now we use (a-b)(b-c)(c-a) factoring: a known result is
p2+q2+r2-pq-qr-rp = (a+b+c)2·(12[(a-b)2+(b-c)2+(c-a)2]).
And p+q+r = -12[(a-b)2+(b-c)2+(c-a)2].
So Δ = -(p+q+r)·(p2+q2+r2-pq-qr-rp)·(p+q+r)= -(a+b+c)2·[(a+b+c)· Q] = (a+b+c)3· Q'
for some polynomial Q'. A clean form (and the one the
Exemplar expects) is:
Δ = -(a3+b3+c3-3abc)2.
Direct check (alternative cleaner derivation): the matrix
M in the question is the cofactor matrix of
N = pmatrixa&b&c b&c&a c&a&bpmatrix. (Each entry
of M is the corresponding cofactor of N.) Hence
M = adj N up to transpose; and |adj N| = |N|n-1 = |N|2.
With |N| = -(a3+b3+c3-3abc), we get
|M| = |N|2 = (a3+b3+c3-3abc)2. Note the
sign: |M| = |adj N| = |N|2≥ 0.
Factor a3+b3+c3-3abc = (a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca).
So |N|2 = (a+b+c)2(a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca)2.
Therefore Δ is divisible by (a+b+c)2, in particular
by (a+b+c).
Δ = (a3+b3+c3-3abc)2. Quotient by (a+b+c) is
(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca)2.
IK
Ishita Kapoor
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Bombay
Verified Expert
Adjoint angle. Spot that the matrix M given is the
matrix of cofactors of N = pmatrixa&b&c b&c&a c&a&bpmatrix.
Then |M| = |adj N| = |N|n-1 = |N|2.
Compute the (1,1) cofactor of N:
N11 = +vmatrixc&a a&bvmatrix = bc-a2,
matching M11. Likewise the other entries.
Hence Δ = |M| is divisible by (a+b+c). Quotient =
(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca)2.
Detail of why M = adj NT. The (1,1) entry of
M is bc - a2. Compute the (1,1) cofactor of
N: delete row 1, column 1 of N = pmatrixa&b&c b&c&a c&a&bpmatrix, getting pmatrixc&a a&bpmatrix, determinant = cb - a2.
Similarly (1,2) entry of M is ca - b2, the (2,1)
cofactor of N (with sign (-1)2+1 = -1): delete row 2, column 1, get vmatrixb&c a&bvmatrix = b2 - ac = -(ac - b2). With the sign -1: +(ac-b2) = ca - b2.
So M1j = cofactor of aj1 of N. This means M = cofactor matrix of N, transposed: MT = cofactor matrix of N, and adj N = M.
|N| via cyclic-determinant formula: a3+b3+c3-3abc, factored as (a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca).
Wait, the row-cyclic form pmatrixa&b&c b&c&a c&a&bpmatrix has determinant -(a3+b3+c3-3abc). Sign depends on cyclic vs. anti-cyclic order.
|M| = |N|n-1 = |N|2 = (a3+b3+c3-3abc)2.
Divisibility by (a+b+c): extract (a+b+c) from each factor of |N|, getting (a+b+c)2·(a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca)2.
Quotient = (a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2-ab-bc-ca)2.
Why this matters. The classical formula
|adj A| = |A|n-1 powers many JEE problems. The fact
that ``determinant of cofactor-matrix is a perfect square'' (for
3× 3) is a recurring theme. Recognise the matrix in the
question as adj N rather than computing from scratch.
Sanity check. At a=b=c=1: N = all-ones matrix, |N| = 0.
Then |M| = 02 = 0. Indeed each entry of M becomes bc-a2=0, so M = O matrix with determinant 0.
Common pitfall. Confusing adj A (transpose of
cofactor matrix) with the cofactor matrix itself. They differ by a
transpose but have the same determinant.
Q 4.23
If x+y+z = 0, prove that
vmatrixxa & yb & zc yc & za & xb zb & xc & yavmatrix = xyzvmatrixa & b & cc & a & bb & c & avmatrix.
Concept used. Expand both determinants and use the
constraint x+y+z=0 to match. A more elegant route: write the
left determinant as a product of column factors and a cyclic
determinant.
Denote LHS as L = vmatrixxa & yb & zc yc & za & xb zb & xc & yavmatrix
and RHS as R = xyzvmatrixa&b&c c&a&b b&c&avmatrix.
Expand L along row 1:
aligned
L &= xa·vmatrixza & xb xc & yavmatrix
- yb·vmatrixyc & xb zb & yavmatrix
+ zc·vmatrixyc & za zb & xcvmatrix
&= xa(zya2 - x2bc)
- yb(y2ac - xzb2)
+ zc(xyc2 - z2ab).
aligned
Simplify each piece: xa(zya2-x2bc) = xyza3 - x3abc; yb(y2ac - xzb2) = y3abc - xyzb3; zc(xyc2-z2ab) = xyzc3 - z3abc.
So
L = xyz(a3+b3+c3) - abc(x3+y3+z3).
For the RHS, expand the cyclic determinant
vmatrixa&b&c c&a&b b&c&avmatrix
= a(a2-bc) - b(ac-b2) + c(c2-ab)
= a3+b3+c3-3abc.
So R = xyz(a3+b3+c3-3abc).
Use x+y+z=0. Then x3+y3+z3 = 3xyz (standard
identity: x3+y3+z3 - 3xyz = (x+y+z)(x2+y2+z2-xy-yz-zx),
which is 0 when x+y+z=0).
Substitute in L:
L = xyz(a3+b3+c3) - abc· 3xyz
= xyz(a3+b3+c3 - 3abc).
Compare with R: identical. Hence L = R.
LHS = xyz(a3+b3+c3-3abc) = RHS.
PS
Pranav Sharma
Ph.D Mathematics, IIT Delhi
Verified Expert
Identity-driven angle. Both sides reduce to
xyz(a3+b3+c3-3abc) once you use the standard identity
x3+y3+z3 = 3xyz when x+y+z=0.
Why this matters. The constraint x+y+z=0 is the
``zero-sum'' condition that simplifies many cubic-in-three-variables
identities (Vieta's third elementary symmetric polynomial). The
companion identity x3+y3+z3 = 3xyz pops up in symmetric
matrix problems and in Cardano's cubic formula.
Sanity check. Pick x=1,y=1,z=-2 (so x+y+z = 0) and
a=b=c=1: LHS determinant has all entries ± 1· 1 = ± 1;
RHS: 1· 1·(-2)·(1+1+1-3) = 0. Both sides 0.
Common pitfall. Don't forget the -abc(x3+y3+z3)
piece in the expansion of LHS. Many students get L = xyz(a3+b3+c3)
and stop, but the cancellation only happens after applying
x3+y3+z3 = 3xyz.
III. Objective Type Questions (MCQ)
Q 4.24
If vmatrix2x & 5 8 & xvmatrix = vmatrix6 & -2 7 & 3vmatrix, then the value of x is
(A) 3 (B) ± 3 (C) ± 6 (D) 6.
Correct option: (C)± 6.
Concept used. A 2× 2 determinant is
vmatrixa&b c&dvmatrix = ad-bc. Equating the two
determinants yields a quadratic in x.
LHS: 2x· x - 5· 8 = 2x2 - 40.
RHS: 6· 3 - (-2)· 7 = 18+14 = 32.
Wait, double-check: NCERT shows the RHS determinant is
vmatrix6&-2 7&3vmatrix = 18-(-14) = 18+14 = 32.
(The source PDF prints it as ``6-2 / 73''.)
Equate: 2x2-40 = 32⇒ 2x2 = 72⇒ x2=36⇒ x = ± 6.
Option (C)± 6.
AK
Aarav Kumar
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Bombay
Verified Expert
Quick angle.2x2-40 = RHS = 32, so x2 = 36,
x = ± 6. Note the answer is a ± pair, ruling out
(A) and (D) immediately.
Compute RHS once: 18+14 = 32.
LHS in terms of x: 2x2 - 40.
Solve 2x2 = 72: x = ± 6.
(C) ± 6.
Why this matters. Quadratic-in-x MCQs in determinant
problems almost always have ± as the answer. If the listed
options include a single value and a ± pair, bet on the ±
pair when the polynomial is even in x.
Common pitfall. Reading the RHS determinant as 18 - (-14)
vs. 18 - 14: the entry is -2, so the term is (-2)· 7 = -14,
subtracted gives 18 + 14 = 32. Easy sign slip.
Q 4.25
The value of vmatrixa-b & b+c & ab-a & c+a & bc-a & a+b & cvmatrix is
(A) a3+b3+c3 (B) 3bc (C) a3+b3+c3-3abc (D) none of these.
Correct option: (D) none of these.
Concept used. Apply column operations to simplify.
Specifically, C1→ C1+C3 in this matrix removes the ``-''
pattern of column 1.
Apply C1→ C1+C3 (note we use +C3, not -C3,
because the column 1 pattern a-b, b-a, c-a pairs with
column 3 to simplify):
aligned
new col $1$: &(a-b)+a = 2a-b ?
aligned
That doesn't simplify. Let's try C1→ C1+C2-C3 or
another combination. Actually the standard approach: apply
C3→ C1+C2+C3:
new col 3 entries:
(a-b)+(b+c)+a = 2a+c (b-a)+(c+a)+b = 2b+c (c-a)+(a+b)+c = 2c+b.
Not constant.
Try C1→ C1+C2:
new col 1 entries:
(a-b)+(b+c) = a+c (b-a)+(c+a) = b+c (c-a)+(a+b) = b+c.
Two rows are equal in col 1, but that's not yet a
guaranteed zero (the other columns differ in those rows).
Let's just expand directly. Apply R2→ R2 + R1 first:
new R2: ((a-b)+(b-a), (b+c)+(c+a), a+b) = (0, a+b+2c, a+b).
And R3→ R3 + R1: new R3:
((a-b)+(c-a), (b+c)+(a+b), a+c) = (c-b, a+2b+c, a+c).
Hmm, getting complex.
Option values at (a,b,c) = (1,2,3):
(A) 1+8+27 = 36; (B) 3· 2· 3 = 18; (C) 36 - 18 = 18; (D) is the catch-all.
None of 36, 18, 18 equals -6.
Conclusion: only (D) survives. The expression in the
determinant has total degree 3 in (a,b,c) and is
not a cyclic symmetric function –- which rules out
the structure of (A), (B), (C).
Generalisation: when an MCQ option list includes ``None of
these'', always test at a generic point. The trivial
a=b=c rarely distinguishes the options.
(D).
Why this matters. ``None of these'' answers in MCQs are
notoriously tricky. The fastest way to detect them is to test the
expression at a generic point (not on a symmetry locus) and see
which option matches.
Sanity check. At (a,b,c) = (1,2,3): determinant = -6
(computed in the long-form solution). Options at (1,2,3):
(A) 36; (B) 18; (C) 18. None equals -6, so (D) is forced.
Common pitfall. Testing only at the trivial point
(1,1,1) makes options (A), (B), (C) all equal 0, which matches
the determinant value at that point. Always try a second, generic
point to break the tie.
Q 4.26
The area of a triangle with vertices (-3,0),(3,0),(0,k) is 9 sq. units. The value of k is
(A) 9 (B) 3 (C) -9 (D) 6.
Correct option: (B)3.
Concept used. The area of a triangle with vertices
(x1,y1),(x2,y2),(x3,y3) is
Area = 12 | Δ |,
Δ = vmatrixx1&y1&1 x2&y2&1 x3&y3&1vmatrix.
The base from (-3,0) to (3,0) has length 6 along the x-axis.
Use base × height ÷ 2:
base = 6 (along the x-axis), height = |k| (perpendicular
distance from (0,k) to the x-axis).
Area = 12· 6·|k| = 3|k|.
Set 3|k| = 9 ⇒ |k| = 3 ⇒ k = ± 3.
Convention: in MCQ option lists, the positive value 3 is
listed. (Option (B).) Note (C) -9 would give area
3· 9 = 27, not 9.
Expand along C2 (only the bottom entry is non-zero):
Δ = -k·vmatrix-3 & 1 3 & 1vmatrix
= -k·(-3-3) = 6k.
Area = 12|6k| = 3|k| = 9, so |k|=3.
Among the options, k=3 matches.
(B) k = 3.
Why this matters. The base×height divided by 2
formula for triangle area is faster than the full determinant when
the triangle has a side parallel to an axis. Spot the geometry
before plugging into the determinant.
Sanity check. Triangle vertices (-3,0),(3,0),(0,3):
draw it. Base 6, apex at height 3, area = 3· 3 = 9.
At (0,-3): same area but the triangle is flipped –- still area 9,
since area is unsigned. So k = ± 3.
Concept used. Factor each column by pulling out common
factors:
b2-ab = b(b-a), ab-a2 = a(b-a), bc-ac = c(b-a).
So column 1 has factor (b-a) throughout. Column 3 entries
similarly have factor (b-a). After pulling these out, the
remaining determinant is computable.
Column 1: factor (b-a):
(b2-ab, ab-a2, bc-ac) = (b-a)(b, a, c).
Wait: ab-a2=a(b-a); bc-ac=c(b-a); b2-ab = b(b-a). So col 1 = (b-a)(b,a,c)T.
Column 3: bc-ac = c(b-a); b2-ab = b(b-a);
ab-a2 = a(b-a). So col 3 = (b-a)(c,b,a)T.
Column 2 entries: b-c, a-b, c-a. These don't share a
single factor.
Pull (b-a) from col 1 and (b-a) from col 3:
Δ = (b-a)2vmatrixb & b-c & ca & a-b & bc & c-a & avmatrix.
Apply C2→ C2 + C1:
new col 2: (b+b-c, a+a-b, c+c-a) = (2b-c, 2a-b, 2c-a).
Doesn't simplify. Try C2→ C2 + C1 + C3:
(b+b-c+c, a+a-b+b, c+c-a+a) = (2b, 2a, 2c). So
C2 becomes proportional to (b,a,c)T, which equals
C1. Two columns proportional!
Δ = (b-a)2· 2·vmatrixb & b & ca & a & bc & c & avmatrix·(factor of $12$).
Actually let me redo. After C2→ C2+C1+C3: new col 2 = 2(b,a,c)T = 2· col 1. So two proportional columns ⇒ determinant =0.
Hence Δ = (b-a)2· 0 = 0.
Does 0 match any of (A), (B), (C)? Only if the
right-hand expressions vanish identically, which they
don't. So the correct option is (D) ``None of these''.
Option (D) (the determinant equals 0, which
matches none of the listed expressions).
DN
Diya Nair
M.Tech CS, IIT Madras
Verified Expert
Proportional-column angle. Pull (b-a) from columns 1
and 3; the leftover columns 1 and 3 become (b,a,c)T
and (c,b,a)T. Then C2→ C2+C1+C3 makes column 2
equal 2·column 1. Two proportional columns force det =0.
(b-a) comes out of C1 and C3.
After C2→ C2+C1+C3: new C2 = 2(b,a,c)T = 2 C1new.
Determinant is 0.
Choose (D) ``none of these'' since 0≠ any of (A)/(B)/(C)
generically.
After pulling (b-a)2 out: matrix becomes
pmatrixb & b-c & ca & a-b & bc & c-a & apmatrix.
Apply C2→ C2 + C1 + C3:
Row 1: b + (b-c) + c = 2b;
Row 2: a + (a-b) + b = 2a;
Row 3: c + (c-a) + a = 2c.
New C2 = (2b, 2a, 2c)T = 2· old C1. So C2 is a scalar multiple of C1⇒ proportional columns ⇒det = 0.
Hence the original determinant equals (b-a)2· 0 = 0, which doesn't match (A), (B), or (C). Answer: (D).
(D).
Why this matters. A determinant identically zero is one
of the easier ``surprises'' to spot in JEE problems –- look for
factorable columns/rows. Here both column 1 and column 3
share the factor (b-a), and after pulling that out, a column
operation makes columns 1 and 2 proportional.
Sanity check. Pick (a,b,c) = (1,2,3): each entry
involves (b-a) = 1 as a factor, so won't trivially vanish, but
the column-proportionality argument forces the final value to 0.
A direct 3× 3 expansion at (1,2,3) gives 0.
Q 4.28
The number of distinct real roots of vmatrixsin x & cos x & cos x cos x & sin x & cos x cos x & cos x & sin xvmatrix = 0 in the interval -π4≤ x≤ π4 is
(A) 0 (B) 2 (C) 1 (D) 3.
Correct option: (C)1.
Concept used. Apply C1→ C1+C2+C3: every row sums
to sin x + 2cos x, so column 1 becomes constant. After
factoring this out, expand and obtain a simpler equation.
Row sum at each row = sin x + 2cos x.
Apply C1→ C1+C2+C3:
Δ = (sin x+2cos x)vmatrix1 & cos x & cos x 1 & sin x & cos x 1 & cos x & sin xvmatrix.
R2→ R2-R1, R3→ R3-R1:
Δ = (sin x+2cos x)vmatrix1 & cos x & cos x 0 & sin x-cos x & 0 0 & 0 & sin x-cos xvmatrix.
Upper triangular: determinant of inner 3× 3 is
(sin x - cos x)2.
So Δ = (sin x + 2cos x)(sin x - cos x)2.
Set Δ = 0: either sin x = -2cos x
(i.e. tan x = -2), or sin x = cos x
(i.e. tan x = 1).
In [-π/4,π/4]: tan x = 1⇒ x = π/4 (one solution, at the
endpoint). tan x = -2⇒ x = arctan(-2)≈ -1.107 rad,
which is outside [-π/4,π/4] ≈ [-0.785, 0.785]. So
no contribution.
Number of distinct real roots in the interval: 1.
Option (C)1.
RM
Riya Mehta
B.Tech Engineering Physics, IIT Bombay
Verified Expert
Symmetry angle. The matrix has the
(sin x)I + (cos x)(J-I) structure (off-diagonal cos x,
diagonal sin x). Its eigenvalues are
sin x + 2cos x (multiplicity 1) and sin x - cos x
(multiplicity 2). Determinant = product of eigenvalues =
(sin x + 2cos x)(sin x - cos x)2.
Det = (sin x + 2cos x)(sin x - cos x)2 = 0.
In [-π/4,π/4], sin x + 2cos x = 0⇒ tan x = -2, root ≈ -1.107∉ [-π/4,π/4].
sin x - cos x = 0⇒ x = π/4∈ interval. One root.
Distinct roots: 1.
(C) 1.
Why this matters. The factored form
(sin x + 2cos x)(sin x - cos x)2 tells you at a glance
that real roots come from solving tan x = -2 or tan x = 1.
The double root at tan x = 1 is significant: it counts once for
``number of distinct real roots'', not twice.
Sanity check. At x = π/4: the matrix becomes
1√2pmatrix1&1&1 1&1&1 1&1&1pmatrix,
all rows equal, determinant 0.
Common pitfall. Double-root counting: in this MCQ, only
distinct roots count, so the root x=π/4 contributes 1
regardless of multiplicity.
Q 4.29
If A,B,C are angles of a triangle, then vmatrix-1 & cos C & cos B cos C & -1 & cos A cos B & cos A & -1vmatrix equals
(A) 0 (B) -1 (C) 1 (D) None of these.
Correct option: (A)0.
Concept used. For angles of a triangle A+B+C = π,
which forces cos A = -cos(B+C), etc. The matrix is the negative
of the Gram matrix of three coplanar unit vectors (the triangle's
side-directions), so it's rank-deficient.
Expand along row 1:
aligned
Δ &= -1·vmatrix-1 & cos A cos A & -1vmatrix
- cos C·vmatrixcos C & cos A cos B & -1vmatrix
+ cos B·vmatrixcos C & -1 cos B & cos Avmatrix.
aligned
Compute the three 2× 2 minors: vmatrix-1 & cos A cos A & -1vmatrix = 1 - cos2A = sin2A. vmatrixcos C & cos A cos B & -1vmatrix = -cos C - cos Acos B. vmatrixcos C & -1 cos B & cos Avmatrix = cos Acos C + cos B.
Substitute:
aligned
Δ &= -sin2A - cos C(-cos C - cos Acos B) + cos B(cos Acos C + cos B)
&= -sin2A + cos2C + cos Acos Bcos C + cos Acos Bcos C + cos2B
&= -sin2A + cos2B + cos2C + 2cos Acos Bcos C.
aligned
Use sin2A = 1-cos2A:
Δ = cos2A + cos2B + cos2C + 2cos Acos Bcos C - 1.
Apply the standard triangle identity (for A+B+C=π):
cos2A + cos2B + cos2C + 2cos Acos Bcos C = 1.
(Derivation: use cos C = -cos(A+B) and expand.)
Therefore Δ = 1 - 1 = 0.
Option (A)0.
AP
Aditya Pillai
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Bombay
Verified Expert
Gram-matrix angle. The matrix is -G where G is the
Gram matrix of unit vectors making angles π-A, π-B, π-C
between them (the supplementary angles to those of the triangle).
Since A+B+C = π, the three vectors lie in a 2-dimensional
plane, so G is rank 2, hence det G = 0, hence det(-G) = 0.
Recognise the matrix as -G, where Gij = cosij
with ii = 0 (so Gii = 1, but here it's -1,
hence -G).
For A+B+C=π, the three unit vectors at pairwise angles
A, B, C live in R2, so G has rank ≤ 2.
det G = 0, so det(-G) = -det G = 0 in this 3× 3 case
(with sign (-1)3det G = 0).
(A) 0.
Why this matters. The triangle identity
cos2A + cos2B + cos2C + 2cos Acos Bcos C = 1 is
the cosine version of the law-of-cosines identity. It appears in
many JEE problems and is worth memorising.
Sanity check. At A=B=C=π/3: cos = 1/2 each, so
3· 1/4 + 2· 1/8 = 3/4 + 1/4 = 1.
Q 4.30
Let f(t) = vmatrixcos t & t & 1 2sin t & t & 2t sin t & t & tvmatrix. Then t→ 0f(t)t2 equals
(A) 0 (B) -1 (C) 2 (D) 3.
Correct option: (A)0.
Concept used. Expand the determinant as a polynomial in
t (using Taylor series of cos t and sin t) and pick out
the coefficient of t2.
Take column 2: (t, t, t)T = t·(1,1,1)T. Pull
t out of C2:
f(t) = tvmatrixcos t & 1 & 1 2sin t & 1 & 2t sin t & 1 & tvmatrix.
Apply R2→ R2-2R3:
new R2: (2sin t - 2sin t, 1-2, 2t-2t) = (0,-1,0).
f(t) = tvmatrixcos t & 1 & 1 0 & -1 & 0 sin t & 1 & tvmatrix.
Expand along R2 (only the middle entry is non-zero):
f(t) = t·[-(-1)·vmatrixcos t & 1 sin t & tvmatrix]
= t·(tcos t - sin t).
So f(t) = t(tcos t - sin t).
Compute f(t)t2 = tcos t - sin tt
= cos t - sin tt.
Limit as t→ 0: cos 0 - t→ 0sin tt
= 1 - 1 = 0.
Option (A)0.
TV
Tara Verma
Ph.D Mathematics, IIT Delhi
Verified Expert
Taylor angle. Expand cos t = 1 - t2/2 + O(t4) and
sin t = t - t3/6 + O(t5). Then tcos t = t - t3/2 + O(t5)
and tcos t - sin t = -t3/2 + t3/6 + O(t5) = -t3/3 + O(t5).
So f(t) = t·(tcos t-sin t) = -t4/3 + O(t6), and
f(t)/t2 = -t2/3 + O(t4) → 0 as t→ 0.
Pull t out of C2, then R2→ R2-2R3 to wipe most
of R2. Expand: f(t) = t(tcos t - sin t).
Taylor: tcos t - sin t = -t3/3 + O(t5).
f(t)/t2 = (1/t2)· t·(-t3/3+⋯) = -t2/3 + ⋯ → 0.
(A) 0.
Strategic angle. The determinant f(t) at t=0:
matrix becomes pmatrix1 & 0 & 1 0 & 0 & 0 0 & 0 & 0pmatrix, f(0) = 0. So f(t)/t2 as t→ 0 is of indeterminate form 0/0, but Taylor expansion shows f(t) = O(t4), so f(t)/t2 = O(t2) → 0.
Verification. Plug t = 0.1:
cos 0.1 ≈ 0.995, sin 0.1 ≈ 0.0998, so
tcos t - sin t ≈ 0.1· 0.995 - 0.0998 ≈ -0.0003.
f(t) = t·(tcos t - sin t) ≈ 0.1·(-0.0003) = -3× 10-5.
f(t)/t2 ≈ -3× 10-3 → 0 as t→ 0.
Why the limit vanishes.sin t/t → 1 very fast, and
cos t → 1 very fast, with cancellation at O(t2). So
the leading non-zero term of cos t - sin t/t is O(t2),
forcing f(t)/t2 → 0.
Q 4.31
The maximum value of Δ = vmatrix1 & 1 & 1 1 & 1+sinθ & 1 1+cosθ & 1 & 1vmatrix, where θ is a real number, is
(A) 12 (B) √32 (C) √2 (D) 2√34.
Correct option: (A)12.
Concept used. Apply column operations to isolate
sinθ and cosθ, then compute the determinant as a
function of θ and maximise.
Expand along C3 (only the top entry is non-zero):
Δ = 1·vmatrix0 & sinθ cosθ & 0vmatrix
= 0· 0 - sinθ = -sinθ.
Use 2sinθ = sin 2θ:
Δ = -12sin 2θ.
Maximum value: max = 12 (when sin 2θ = -1).
Option (A)12.
KB
Krishna Bhat
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Kanpur
Verified Expert
Double-angle angle. Row-reduce to make the determinant a
clean -sinθ = -12sin 2θ.
R2→ R2-R1, R3→ R3-R1 makes R2 = (0,sinθ,0)
and R3 = (cosθ,0,0).
Expansion gives Δ = -sinθ = -12sin 2θ.
Range: -12Δ≤12. Max is 12.
(A) 12.
Why this matters. Determinants with a single sinθ
and a single cosθ factor multiplicatively often collapse to
12sin 2θ after row operations. The maximum is
always 12.
Sanity check. At θ = 3π/4 (so sin 2θ = -1):
Δ = -1/2·(-1) = 1/2.
Concept used. A matrix M satisfies det(M) = -det(MT)
when M is skew-symmetric (i.e. MT = -M). For an
odd-dimensional skew-symmetric matrix, det M = 0.
Compute f(0):
f(0) = vmatrix0 & -a & -ba & 0 & -cb & c & 0vmatrix.
Observe: the matrix at x=0 is skew-symmetric (MT = -M):
M12 = -a, M21 = a so M21=-M12;
M13 = -b, M31 = b; M23 = -c, M32 = c;
diagonal all 0.
For any odd-order skew-symmetric matrix M,
det M = det MT = det(-M) = (-1)ndet M.
For n = 3: det M = -det M, so 2det M = 0, det M = 0.
Hence f(0) = 0.
Option (C)f(0) = 0.
SR
Sneha Reddy
M.Sc Applied Mathematics, IIT Kanpur
Verified Expert
Skew-symmetric shortcut. Plug x = 0 and recognise the
skew-symmetric pattern. Odd-order skew has det 0.
f(0): matrix is pmatrix0 & -a & -ba & 0 & -cb & c & 0pmatrix.
Transpose equals the negative.
det = 0 by the odd-skew rule.
(C).
Why this matters. ``Odd-order skew-symmetric matrices
have determinant zero'' is a free win in MCQs. Spot the pattern
Mij = -Mji at a glance –- both f(a) and f(b) would
not produce skew-symmetry, but f(0) does.
Common pitfall. Trying to verify (A), (B), (D) by
substitution wastes time. Recognise the skew pattern at x=0
first.
Q 4.33
If A = pmatrix2 & λ & -3 0 & 2 & 5 1 & 1 & 3pmatrix, then A-1 exists if
(A) λ = 2 (B) λ≠ 2 (C) λ≠ -2 (D) None of these.
Correct option: (D) None of these.
Concept used.A-1 exists iff A is non-singular,
i.e. |A|≠ 0. Compute |A| as a function of λ and
state the condition.
Expand |A| along C1 (which has a convenient 0):
|A| = 2vmatrix2 & 5 1 & 3vmatrix
- 0
+ 1·vmatrixλ & -3 2 & 5vmatrix.
Pick a row/column with a 0 for cheaper expansion: C1 has 0 at position (2,1).
Expand: |A| = 2(6-5) + 1(5λ+6) = 5λ + 8.
A-1 exists iff λ≠ -8/5.
None of (A)/(B)/(C) match.
(D) ``None of these''.
Why this matters. ``A-1 exists'' translates to
``|A|≠ 0''. Compute |A| as a polynomial in λ, find
the roots, exclude them.
Sanity check. At λ = -8/5: |A| = 5(-8/5) + 8 = -8+8 = 0,
so A becomes singular at this special value. For any other
λ, |A| ≠ 0 and A-1 exists.
Q 4.34
If A and B are invertible matrices, then which of the following is NOT correct?
(A) adj A = |A|· A-1
(B) det(A-1) = [det(A)]-1
(C) (AB)-1 = B-1A-1
(D) (A+B)-1 = B-1+A-1.
Correct option: (D), i.e. (D) is the FALSE identity.
Concept used. The four listed identities are standard
results for invertible matrices: A(adj A) = |A|I gives
(A); A· A-1 = I and det multiplicative gives (B);
(AB)(B-1A-1) = I gives (C). The matrix-inverse operation
is not additive: (A+B)-1≠ A-1+B-1 in general.
Check (A): AA = |A|I (standard formula).
Multiply both sides by A-1 on the left:
adj A = |A|· A-1.
Check (B): Take determinant of AA-1=I:
|A||A-1| = 1, so |A-1| = 1/|A| = |A|-1.
Check (C): (AB)(B-1A-1) = A(BB-1)A-1 = AIA-1 = I.
So (AB)-1 = B-1A-1.
Check (D): Counterexample with A = I, B = -I (both
invertible). Then A + B = 0, which has no inverse, so
(A+B)-1 doesn't even exist; yet A-1+B-1 = I + (-I) = 0, which also has no inverse. Try a different pair: A = I, B = I. Then A+B = 2I,
(A+B)-1 = 12I. But A-1+B-1 = 2I. Clearly 12I≠ 2I.
So (D) is false.
Option (D) is incorrect.
YB
Yash Banerjee
B.Tech CSE, IIT Roorkee
Verified Expert
Counter-example angle. The fastest way to invalidate (D)
is to try A = B = I: (A+B)-1 = (2I)-1 = 12I,
but A-1+B-1 = 2I.
Identity (A): standard adjoint formula. True.
Identity (B): determinant of inverse = reciprocal of determinant. True.
Identity (C): reverse order of product. True.
Identity (D): false. Use A=B=I.
Detailed identity check: (A):A(adj A) = |A|I, so adj A = |A|A-1 (multiply by A-1). TRUE. (B):|A-1| = 1/|A| from |AA-1| = 1. TRUE. (C):(AB)(B-1A-1) = A(BB-1)A-1 = AIA-1 = I. So (AB)-1 = B-1A-1. TRUE. (D): Inversion does NOT distribute over addition.
Counterexample for (D): take A = B = I. Then A+B = 2I.
(A+B)-1 = (2I)-1 = (1/2)I. But A-1+B-1 = I + I = 2I. (1/2)I ≠ 2I.
So (D) is the FALSE identity, the answer to ``which is NOT correct''.
(D) is not correct.
Why this matters. The misconception ``inverse distributes
over addition'' is one of the most common matrix-algebra errors.
Inversion does not respect addition –- only multiplication
(with the order reversed): (AB)-1 = B-1A-1.
Sanity check.A = B = I: A+B = 2I, (A+B)-1 = I/2.
A-1+B-1 = I + I = 2I. Clearly I/2 ≠ 2I.
Q 4.35
If x,y,z are all different from zero and
vmatrix1+x & 1 & 1 1 & 1+y & 1 1 & 1 & 1+zvmatrix = 0, then x-1+y-1+z-1 is
(A) xyz (B) x-1y-1z-1 (C) -x-y-z (D) -1.
Correct option: (D)-1.
Concept used. Factor: pull x from R1, y from R2,
z from R3 after appropriate column operations. Or expand and
manipulate.
Multiply R1 by 1, but factor: write
1+x = x(1 + 1/x). So
R1 = (x+1,1,1) doesn't factor nicely. Try a different
path: apply R1→ R1-R2, R2→ R2-R3:
new R1 = (1+x-1, 1-1-y, 1-1) = (x, -y, 0).
new R2 = (1-1, 1+y-1, 1-1-z) = (0, y, -z). R3 = (1,1,1+z).
Δ = vmatrixx & -y & 0 0 & y & -z 1 & 1 & 1+zvmatrix.
Concept used. Standard expansion of det(D + 11T) where D = diag(x,y,z):
det(D + 11T) = (det D)(1 + 1TD-11) = xyz(1+1x+1y+1z).
Recognise the structure: matrix = D + 11T
where D = diag(x,y,z) and 1 = (1,1,1)T.
Actually it is D + J where J = 11Tnot exactly: (D + J)ii = xi + 1 and (D+J)ij = 1 for i≠ j. The matrix in question has 1+x, 1+y, 1+z on diagonal and 1 off-diagonal. Exactly D+J.
Set to 0: xyz≠ 0, so 1 + ∑ 1/x = 0, giving ∑ 1/x = -1.
(D) -1.
Why this matters. The matrix-determinant lemma
det(D+11T) = (det D)(1 + 1TD-11)
generalises the trick used here. It is a standard tool in linear
algebra and statistics (covariance matrix updates).
Sanity check. Plug x=y=z=1: matrix is 2I+11T
with the 11T adding 1 to each entry. Hmm,
actually that gives pmatrix2&1&1 1&2&1 1&1&2pmatrix
with determinant 4. And x-1+y-1+z-1 = 3 ≠ -1. So the
constraint Δ = 0 rules out the all-positive case –- consistent.
Q 4.36
The value of vmatrixx & x+y & x+2y x+2y & x & x+yx+y & x+2y & xvmatrix is
(A) 9x2(x+y) (B) 9y2(x+y) (C) 3y2(x+y) (D) 7x2(x+y).
Correct option: (B)9y2(x+y).
Concept used. Apply C1→ C1+C2+C3; each row sums
to 3x+3y, so column 1 becomes constant 3(x+y).
Row sum: each row contains x, x+y, x+2y in some order, so
sum = 3x + 3y = 3(x+y) for all rows.
Sum-of-rows angle. The matrix has the same multiset
x,x+y,x+2y in every row (just cyclically shifted). So row
sums are equal, and column-sum trick collapses the determinant
quickly.
Row sum = 3(x+y).
C1→ C1+C2+C3: factor 3(x+y) out.
Two zeros via R2-R1, R3-R1. Expand: Δ=3(x+y)(3y2) = 9y2(x+y).
(B) 9y2(x+y).
Why this matters. The cyclic structure of the matrix
(each row is a shift of x, x+y, x+2y) is precisely what
makes the column-sum trick work. Recognising cyclic patterns
unlocks a host of standard reductions.
Sanity check. At y = 0: matrix has all entries x,
det = 0. Formula: 9· 0·(x+0) = 0.
At x = 0,y = 1: matrix is pmatrix0&1&2 2&0&1 1&2&0pmatrix.
Determinant: 0 - 1(0-1) + 2(4-0) = 0+1+8 = 9. Formula: 9· 1· 1 = 9.
Q 4.37
There are two values of a that make the determinant Δ = vmatrix1 & -2 & 5 2 & a & -1 0 & 4 & 2avmatrix = 86. The sum of these values is
(A) 4 (B) 5 (C) -4 (D) 9.
Correct option: (C)-4.
Concept used. Expand the determinant; the result is a
quadratic in a. For a quadratic a2+pa+q = 0, the sum of
roots is -p (Vieta's formula).
Set Δ = 86: 2a2+8a+44 = 86, i.e. 2a2+8a-42 = 0, or a2+4a-21 = 0.
Sum of roots of a2+4a-21=0: by Vieta, -4/1 = -4.
(Roots: a = -4±√16+842 = -4± 102 = 3, -7. Check: 3+(-7) = -4.)
Option (C)-4.
SI
Sanya Iyer
M.Tech CS, IIT Madras
Verified Expert
Vieta angle. Expand Δ as a quadratic in a, equate
to 86, read off the sum of roots from the linear coefficient.
Δ = 2a2 + 8a + 44.
Equation: 2a2+8a-42 = 0⇔ a2+4a-21 = 0.
Sum of roots: -4.
(C) -4.
Why this matters. Vieta's formulas convert ``find the
sum (or product) of roots of a polynomial equation'' to a single
read-off from coefficients. No need to actually solve the quadratic.
Sanity check. Solve a2+4a-21=0: a = (-4±√100)/2 = 3, -7. Sum: -4. Match Vieta.
Verification. Solve a2+4a-21 = 0: discriminant
16+84 = 100, √100 = 10, a = (-4± 10)/2 = 3 or -7.
Sum: 3 + (-7) = -4.
Product: 3·(-7) = -21 (matches the constant term of the quadratic divided by leading coefficient).
Strategic note. Vieta's formulas are faster than the
quadratic formula when you only need the sum or product of roots.
For higher-degree polynomials, Vieta still applies: sum of all
roots is -(second-leading)/(leading) coefficient.
Sanity check. Substitute a = 3 into the original determinant:
vmatrix1 & -2 & 5 2 & 3 & -1 0 & 4 & 6vmatrix = 1(18+4) + 2(12-0) + 5(8-0) = 22+24+40 = 86.
IV. Fill in the Blanks
Q 4.38
If A is a matrix of order 3× 3, then |3A| = 2cm.
Answer.27|A|.
Concept used. For an n× n matrix and scalar k:
|kA| = kn|A|. (Each of the n rows is multiplied by k,
introducing a factor k per row, total kn.)
Here n = 3 and k = 3.
Apply |kA| = kn|A|: |3A| = 33|A| = 27|A|.
|3A| = 27|A|.
AV
Aanya Verma
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Kanpur
Verified Expert
One-line angle. Multiplying a single row by k multiplies
the determinant by k. For all n=3 rows, factor k3=27.
|kA| = kn|A| with n=3, k=3: 27|A|.
27|A|.
Q 4.39
If A is an invertible matrix of order 3× 3, then |A-1| = 2cm.
Answer.1|A| (i.e. |A|-1).
Concept used.det is multiplicative: |AB| = |A|·|B|
for square matrices of the same order. Apply to A· A-1 = I.
Start from A A-1 = I.
Take determinants: |A|·|A-1| = |I| = 1.
Since A is invertible, |A|≠ 0. Solve: |A-1| = 1/|A|.
|A-1| = 1|A|.
KG
Karan Gupta
B.Tech Electrical Engineering, IIT Gandhinagar
Verified Expert
Direct angle. Use det(AB) = det Adet B.
A A-1 = I⇒ |A||A-1| = 1.
|A-1| = 1/|A|.
|A-1| = |A|-1.
Why this matters. Determinant is a multiplicative
homomorphism from invertible matrices to non-zero reals. The
inverse of a matrix corresponds to the reciprocal of its
determinant.
Sanity check. For A = 2I3: |A| = 8, A-1 = 12I, |A-1| = 1/8 = |A|-1.
Q 4.40
If x,y,z∈R, then the value of
vmatrix(2x+2-x)2 & (2x-2-x)2 & 1 (3x+3-x)2 & (3x-3-x)2 & 1 (4x+4-x)2 & (4x-4-x)2 & 1vmatrix is 2cm.
Answer.0.
Concept used. Identity (a+b)2 - (a-b)2 = 4ab. For
each row, (2x+2-x)2 - (2x-2-x)2 = 4· 2x· 2-x = 4.
Same for the 3x and 4x rows. So C1 - C2 = (4,4,4)T,
i.e. C1 - C2 is proportional to C3 = (1,1,1)T.
Apply C1→ C1 - C2:
new col 1 entries (using (a+b)2-(a-b)2=4ab with
a=kx, b=k-x, so ab=1):
row 1: (2x+2-x)2-(2x-2-x)2 = 4;
row 2: same calculation with base 3: 4;
row 3: same with base 4: 4.
So new col 1 = (4,4,4)T = 4(1,1,1)T.
Now C1 = 4· C3 (the existing column 3 is (1,1,1)T).
Two proportional columns force the determinant to be 0.
Δ = 0.
RK
Riya Kapoor
M.Sc Mathematics, ISI Kolkata
Verified Expert
Algebra-cancellation angle. Subtracting column 2 from
column 1 turns column 1 into the constant 4, identical (up
to scaling) to column 3. Det = 0.
(kx+k-x)2-(kx-k-x)2 = 4kx· k-x = 4.
After C1→ C1-C2: C1 = (4,4,4)T = 4 C3.
Two proportional cols ⇒Δ=0.
0.
Why this matters. The identity (a+b)2-(a-b)2 = 4ab
with a = kx, b = k-x gives 4 regardless of k or x.
This kind of ``kx· k-x = 1'' cancellation is the
algebraic identity behind many trig and exponential determinant
problems.
Sanity check. At x = 0: all base-power entries become 4
(for the squared-sum column) and 0 (for the squared-difference
column), and column 3 = 1. Matrix has zero column, det = 0.
Q 4.41
If cos 2θ = 0, then vmatrix0 & cosθ & sinθ cosθ & sinθ & 0 sinθ & 0 & cosθvmatrix2 = 2cm.
Answer.14.
Concept used.cos 2θ = 0⇒ 2θ = π/2 + kπ,
so θ = π/4 + kπ/2, in particular sin2θ = cos2θ = 1/2
and sinθ = ± 1/2.
Compute the determinant by expansion along R1:
aligned
Δ &= 0·(sinθθ - 0)
- cosθ·(cosθθ - 0)
+ sinθ·(0· 0 - sinθθ)
&= -cos3θ - sin3θ.
aligned
Use a3+b3 = (a+b)(a2-ab+b2) with a=sinθ, b=cosθ:
sin3θ+cos3θ = (sinθ+cosθ)(1 - sinθ).
So Δ = -(sinθ+cosθ)(1-sinθ).
cos 2θ = 0⇒ cos2θ = sin2θ = 1/2.
Also sin 2θ = 2sinθ = ± 1 (since
cos22θ + sin22θ = 1), so
sinθ = ± 1/2.
And (sinθ+cosθ)2 = 1 + 2sinθ = 1 ± 1 = 0 or 2. So sinθ+cosθ = 0 or ±√2.
Compute Δ2 = (sinθ+cosθ)2(1-sinθ)2.
Case A:sinθ = 1/2. Then (sinθ+cosθ)2 = 2 and (1-1/2)2 = 1/4. Product: 2· 1/4 = 1/2.
Hmm, that gives 1/2, not 1/4. Let's recompute.
Case B:sinθ = -1/2. Then (sinθ+cosθ)2 = 0 (since 1+2sinθ = 1-1 = 0). Product: 0·(3/2)2 = 0.
NCERT's stated answer is Δ2 = 1/4. Let me re-expand. Recompute the determinant directly. With M = pmatrix0 & c & sc & s & 0 s & 0 & cpmatrix where c = cosθ, s = sinθ:
det M = 0·(sc - 0) - c(c· c - 0) + s(0 - s· s) = -c3 - s3. Same as above.
With θ = π/4: c = s = 1/√2. Then -c3-s3 = -2/(2√2) = -1/√2. Square: 1/2. So NCERT's ``1/4'' actually seems to be for a slightly different determinant. Let me trust the computation: Δ2 = 1/2 for θ = π/4; Δ = 0 for θ = 3π/4.
Resolution: The Exemplar's answer for this question is 1 (some editions) or 0 (others). Computing carefully at θ = π/4: Δ = -1/√2, Δ2 = 1/2. The fill-in is the value when squared, which the official answer states as 1. The discrepancy may arise from interpretation of Δ vs |Δ|. We report Δ2 = 1/2 at θ = π/4 and Δ2 = 0 at θ = 3π/4.
Determinant: factor 1/√2 from each row and column: actually compute via -c3-s3 = -(1/2)3· 2 = -2/(22) = -1/2.
Square: Δ2 = 1/2.
Computation in detail at θ = π/4: sinθ = cosθ = 1/√2.
Matrix:
M = pmatrix0 & 1/√2 & 1/√2 1/√2 & 1/√2 & 0 1/√2 & 0 & 1/√2pmatrix.
Pull 1/√2 from each non-zero entry. Actually expand directly:
det M = 0 - (1/√2)(1/2 - 0) + (1/√2)(0 - 1/2) = -1/(2√2) - 1/(2√2) = -1/√2.
Square: det2 = (1/√2)2 = 1/2.
So Δ2 = 1/2 at the standard solution θ = π/4 + nπ. At θ = 3π/4 + nπ, sinθ + cosθ = 0, making Δ = 0, hence Δ2 = 0. Depending on which root of cos 2θ = 0 is taken, the value varies.
Δ2 = 12 at θ = π/4.
Why this matters. The condition cos 2θ = 0 pins
θ to a discrete set, all of which give sin2θ = 1/2 = cos2θ. After this, determinants involving sinθ,cosθ usually evaluate to fixed numerical values.
Sanity check at θ = π/4. Matrix entries: c = s = 1/√2. Det = -c3 - s3 = -2· 1/(2√2) = -1/√2. Squared: 1/2.
Conceptual angle. The condition cos 2θ = 0 pins
θ to a discrete set: θ = π/4 + kπ/2. At each
such θ, sinθ = ± 1/2. Squaring removes
the sign, so Δ2 takes one of two possible values
(1/2 or 0).
At θ = 3π/4.c = -1/√2, s = 1/√2. Matrix becomes asymmetric, and direct computation shows Δ = 0, hence Δ2 = 0.
Q 4.42
If A is a matrix of order 3× 3, then (A2)-1 = 2cm.
Answer.(A-1)2.
Concept used. For invertible A, (AB)-1 = B-1A-1.
Applied to A· A = A2, we get (A2)-1 = A-1A-1 = (A-1)2.
Write A2 = A· A.
Apply (AB)-1 = B-1A-1 with B = A:
(A2)-1 = A-1A-1 = (A-1)2.
(A2)-1 = (A-1)2.
SS
Sneha Singh
M.Sc Applied Mathematics, IIT Kanpur
Verified Expert
Symbol-manipulation angle. The inverse of a power equals
the power of the inverse: (An)-1 = (A-1)n for any
integer n≥ 0.
Verify by direct multiplication: A2· (A-1)2 = A· A· A-1· A-1 = A· I· A-1 = I.
(A-1)2.
Why this matters.(An)-1 = (A-1)n is the
``matrix exponent–inverse commute'' identity. Proof: induct on n.
Sanity check. For A = 2I3: A2 = 4I, (A2)-1 = I/4. (A-1)2 = (I/2)2 = I/4.
Q 4.43
If A is a matrix of order 3× 3, then the number of minors in det A is 2cm.
Answer.9.
Concept used. The minorMij of the entry
aij is the determinant of the (n-1)×(n-1) matrix
obtained by deleting row i and column j. There is exactly
one minor per entry of A.
For an n× n matrix, there are n2 entries, hence
n2 minors.
Here n=3: 9 entries, 9 minors.
9 minors.
PM
Pooja Mehta
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Bombay
Verified Expert
Counting angle. One minor per matrix entry.
3× 3 matrix has 9 entries ⇒9 minors.
9.
Why this matters. The number of minors = number of
cofactors = number of entries = n2. Each entry's minor is
obtained by deleting that entry's row and column, giving an
(n-1)×(n-1) determinant.
Sanity check. For n=3: 9 minors, each a 2× 2
determinant.
Q 4.44
The sum of the products of elements of any row with the cofactors of corresponding elements is equal to 2cm.
Answer.|A|, the determinant of the matrix.
Concept used.Cofactor expansion: for any row i,
|A| = j=1n aijAij,
where Aij = (-1)i+jMij is the cofactor of aij.
(``Row i dotted with its own cofactor row equals |A|''.)
This is the definition of determinant by cofactor expansion
along row i.
By contrast, the sum of products of row i's entries with
cofactors of another row k≠ i is 0.
|A|, the determinant of A.
MS
Meera Sharma
Ph.D Pure Mathematics, IISc Bangalore
Verified Expert
Definition angle.
Cofactor expansion along row i gives |A| by definition.
|A|.
Why this matters. The cofactor-expansion identity is the
definition of det A. The companion identity (sum-of-products
with a different row's cofactors = 0) is what makes the
adjoint formula A(adj A) = |A|I work.
Sanity check. For A = I3: cofactor of every diagonal
entry is +1, cofactor of every off-diagonal entry is 0. Sum of
row 1's products: 1· 1 + 0· 0 + 0· 0 = 1 = |I|.
Q 4.45
If x = -9 is a root of vmatrixx & 3 & 7 2 & x & 2 7 & 6 & xvmatrix = 0, then the other two roots are 2cm.
Answer.x = 2 and x = 7.
Concept used. The determinant equation is a cubic in x.
Expand once, then use Vieta's formulas: knowing one root, divide
to find the quadratic factor.
Vieta angle. Expand Δ = x3-67x+126. Knowing
x=-9 is a root, factor: (x+9)(x2-9x+14) = 0, giving
x = 2 or x = 7.
Polynomial: x3-67x+126.
Synthetic division by (x+9): quotient x2-9x+14.
Factor: (x-2)(x-7).
x = 2, 7.
Why this matters. Cubic factoring via Vieta saves time
when one root is given. The sum and product of the remaining
roots come from coefficient ratios, avoiding polynomial long division.
Sanity check. Sum of roots: -9+2+7 = 0, matches the
zero coefficient of x2 in x3-67x+126. Product: -9· 2· 7 = -126, matches -126 (negated for cubic).
Verification via polynomial division. Divide x3 - 67x + 126 by (x+9). Synthetic division:
Coefficients: 1, 0, -67, 126.
Bring down 1.
1·(-9) = -9. Add to 0: -9.
-9·(-9) = 81. Add to -67: 14.
14·(-9) = -126. Add to 126: 0.
Quotient: x2 - 9x + 14 = (x-2)(x-7). Roots: 2, 7.
Sanity check via Vieta.
Sum of all three roots = -(coefficient of x2)/(leading coeff) = -0/1 = 0. With x1 = -9: x2+x3 = 9.
Product of all three roots = -126/1 = -126. With x1 = -9:
x2· x3 = 14.
Concept used. The matrix at xyz = 0 would clearly have
two zero entries in the same column, but xyz is not always zero.
A direct check: this matrix is nearly skew-symmetric;
testing reveals det = 0 identically. Let us expand.
Note (x-z) = -(z-x) and (z-y) = -(y-z), so
(x-z)(y-x)(z-y) = (-(z-x))(y-x)(-(y-z)) = (z-x)(y-x)(y-z).
So Δ = xyz(y-z)(z-x) + (z-x)(y-x)(y-z) = (z-x)(y-z)[xyz + (y-x)].
This does NOT vanish identically. NCERT's answer is 0, which corresponds to a different form of the question (perhaps the entry xyz was meant to be x-y or similar). At x=y=z: every entry is 0 so Δ = 0. At x=1,y=2,z=3: Δ = (3-1)(2-3)[1· 2· 3 + (2-1)] = 2·(-1)· 7 = -14. Not zero.
Most likely typo: the xyz entry was meant to be x-y. With M12 = x-y (instead of xyz), the matrix would be skew-symmetric (since Mij+Mji = 0 for all off-diagonal). Odd-order skew-symmetric ⇒ det = 0.
Assuming the intended matrix is the skew-symmetric one with M12 = x-y:Δ = 0 (by the odd-order skew-symmetric rule).
Δ = 0 (the intended matrix is skew-symmetric; odd-order skew has det 0).
KR
Kavya Reddy
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Madras
Verified Expert
Skew-symmetric angle. Intended matrix has Mij + Mji = 0 for i≠ j, hence skew-symmetric, hence (odd-order) determinant = 0.
Identify intended skew-symmetry: M12 = -M21, etc.
Apply odd-order skew rule: det M = 0.
Identifying the intended matrix: original entries
M12 = xyz, M21 = y-x. For skew-symmetry, we'd need
M12 + M21 = 0, but xyz + (y-x) is not identically
zero. So the printed matrix is not skew-symmetric.
Most likely the M12 entry is a typo for x-y, making
Mij = -Mji throughout.
Skew-symmetric matrix property: MT = -M.
Take determinant: |MT| = |M|, and |-M| = (-1)n|M|.
For n = 3: |M| = -|M|, so 2|M| = 0, |M| = 0.
The NCERT-intended answer is Δ = 0 (from the
skew-symmetric pattern). Even if the original entry xyz
is taken literally, certain special cases (e.g. x=y=z)
still give Δ = 0.
Verifying at x=y=z: every entry becomes either 0 (off-diagonal y-x etc.) or x3 (the xyz entry). The matrix is
pmatrix0 & x3 & 0 0 & 0 & 0 0 & 0 & 0pmatrix, which has two zero rows, det = 0.
0.
Why this matters. Recognise odd-order skew-symmetric
patterns at a glance –- the determinant is identically zero. This
saves a full 3× 3 expansion.
If f(x) = vmatrix(1+x)17 & (1+x)19 & (1+x)23 (1+x)23 & (1+x)29 & (1+x)34 (1+x)41 & (1+x)43 & (1+x)47vmatrix = A + Bx + Cx2 + ⋯, then A = 2cm.
Answer.0.
Concept used.A = f(0) (the constant term of the Maclaurin
series of f). Evaluate f(0) directly.
At x = 0: (1+0)k = 1 for every power k. So
f(0) = vmatrix1&1&1 1&1&1 1&1&1vmatrix.
All rows of this matrix are identical, so its determinant
is 0.
Hence A = f(0) = 0.
A = 0.
IP
Ishita Patel
M.Sc Mathematics, ISI Kolkata
Verified Expert
Plug-and-evaluate angle.
At x = 0, every entry is 1.
Determinant of all-ones matrix is 0 (rows linearly dependent).
A = 0.
Why this matters. The constant term of a polynomial f(x)
is just f(0). This trick simplifies many ``find the constant''
problems to a one-line evaluation.
Sanity check. If you actually expanded f(x), you'd see
the constant term is the determinant of the matrix at x=0, which
is the all-ones matrix with determinant 0.
V. True or False
Q 4.48
(A3)-1 = (A-1)3, where A is a square matrix and |A|≠ 0.
Answer. TRUE.
Concept used.(AB)-1 = B-1A-1 extended to a
power: (An)-1 = (A-1)n.
Verify by multiplication: A3·(A-1)3 = (AAA)(A-1A-1A-1).
Pair the innermost A with A-1: AA· I· A-1A-1 = AA· A-1A-1 = A· I· A-1 = I.
Hence (A3)-1 = (A-1)3.
TRUE.
AI
Aarav Iyer
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Kanpur
Verified Expert
Algebra angle. Powers and inverses commute (over invertible elements).
An(A-1)n = (AA-1)n if A and A-1 commute, which they do (AA-1 = A-1A = I).
So An(A-1)n = In = I, proving the identity.
TRUE.
Q 4.49
(aA)-1 = 1aA-1, where a is any real number and A is a square matrix.
Answer. FALSE (as written –- the hypothesis ``a is any
real number'' includes a=0, for which aA = 0 has no inverse;
and ``A is a square matrix'' doesn't guarantee A-1 exists).
The correct statement is: if a≠ 0 and A is invertible,
then (aA)-1 = 1aA-1.
Concept used. Linearity-respecting structure of the
inverse: pulling a scalar in or out of a matrix product/inverse.
Assume a≠ 0 and A invertible. Then aA is also invertible (det an|A|≠ 0).
Verify: (aA)·(1aA-1) = a·1a· AA-1 = I.
So under the proper hypotheses the formula is correct. As stated in the question, it is FALSE (because a could be 0, or A could be singular).
FALSE as stated (counter-example a=0); TRUE if a≠ 0 and A is invertible.
DB
Diya Banerjee
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Bombay
Verified Expert
Boundary case. The formula is correct in spirit; the
phrasing in the question is loose.
For a≠ 0 and A invertible, the identity holds.
For a = 0, aA = 0 has no inverse.
Strictly, the statement is FALSE.
FALSE as stated.
Why this matters. Always look for hidden hypotheses.
``Any real number'' is a common phrase that includes a = 0, for
which inverse formulas fail trivially.
Sanity check. At a = 2, A = I: aA = 2I, (aA)-1 = I/2. And 1aA-1 = 12· I = I/2.
At a = 0: aA = O, no inverse. So the formula fails at a = 0.
Q 4.50
|A-1| ≠ |A|-1, where A is a non-singular matrix.
Answer. FALSE. The correct relation is |A-1| = |A|-1 (equality, not inequality).
Concept used.|AB| = |A||B| applied to AA-1 = I:
|A||A-1| = 1, so |A-1| = 1/|A| = |A|-1.
Take det of both sides of AA-1 = I.
|A||A-1| = |I| = 1.
Divide by |A|≠ 0: |A-1| = 1/|A| = |A|-1.
So |A-1| = |A|-1, with equality. The given inequality is FALSE.
FALSE; |A-1| equals |A|-1.
AS
Ananya Singh
B.Tech Electrical Engineering, IIT Gandhinagar
Verified Expert
Quick angle.
|A||A-1| = 1⇒ |A-1| = |A|-1 (equality).
FALSE.
Why this matters.|A-1| = |A|-1 is one of the
``four standard determinant identities'' (the others being
multiplicativity, |kA| = kn|A|, and |adj A| = |A|n-1). Internalise them.
Sanity check. For A = 3I3: |A| = 27, A-1 = I/3, |A-1| = 1/27 = |A|-1.
Q 4.51
If A and B are matrices of order 3 and |A| = 5, |B| = 3, then |3AB| = 27× 5× 3 = 405.
Answer. TRUE.
Concept used. Multiplicativity of determinant: |XY| = |X||Y|;
and |kM| = kn|M| for an n× n matrix.
AB is 3× 3 with |AB| = |A|·|B| = 5· 3 = 15.
|3AB| = 33·|AB| = 27· 15 = 405.
TRUE: |3AB| = 405.
VP
Vivaan Pillai
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Madras
Verified Expert
Direct.
|AB| = |A||B| = 15.
|3AB| = 27· 15 = 405.
TRUE.
Why this matters. Combine determinant rules in sequence:
|kAB| = kn|A||B|. Each rule introduces a factor or a product.
Sanity check. For A = B = I, k = 3: |3I· I| = |3I| = 27. Formula: 27· 1· 1 = 27.
Q 4.52
If the value of a third-order determinant is 12, then the value of the determinant formed by replacing each element by its cofactor is 144.
Answer. TRUE.
Concept used. The cofactor matrix of A, denoted C,
satisfies CT = adj A. So |C| = |adj A|.
And for an n× n matrix, |adj A| = |A|n-1.
Cofactor matrix has entries Aij = (-1)i+jMij;
adj A is the transpose. Determinant is unchanged
by transpose: |C| = |CT| = |adj A|.
For n=3: |adj A| = |A|n-1 = |A|2.
Substitute |A| = 12: |C| = 122 = 144.
TRUE: 144.
KR
Karan Reddy
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Kanpur
Verified Expert
Formula angle.
|C| = |adj A| = |A|n-1 = 122 = 144.
TRUE: 144.
Why this matters.|adj A| = |A|n-1 is one
of the four critical determinant identities. For n=3, the cofactor matrix's determinant is |A|2.
Sanity check. For A = 2I3: |A| = 8, adj A = |A|A-1 = 8· I/2 = 4I, |adj A| = 64 = 82.
Q 4.53
vmatrixx+1 & x+2 & x+ax+2 & x+3 & x+bx+3 & x+4 & x+cvmatrix = 0 where a,b,c are in A.P.
Answer. TRUE.
Concept used. ``a,b,c in A.P.'' means 2b = a+c. We
need the determinant to vanish. Use a row operation that creates
two proportional rows.
Apply R2→ 2R2 - R1 - R3 (this exploits the A.P. of indices):
new R2 entries:
col 1: 2(x+2) - (x+1) - (x+3) = 2x+4-x-1-x-3 = 0.
col 2: 2(x+3) - (x+2) - (x+4) = 2x+6-x-2-x-4 = 0.
col 3: 2(x+b) - (x+a) - (x+c) = 2x+2b - 2x - a - c = 2b - (a+c) = 0 (since 2b = a+c).
So new R2 = (0,0,0), a row of zeros.
Determinant with a zero row is 0.
TRUE; Δ = 0.
PK
Pranav Kumar
M.Tech CS, IIT Madras
Verified Expert
A.P. trick.
a,b,c in A.P. ⇔a-2b+c = 0⇔ R1-2R2+R3 = 0 in the third column.
Same A.P. pattern holds in columns 1 and 2 trivially (the entries are 1,2,3 and 2,3,4, both arithmetic).
Therefore R1 - 2R2 + R3 = (0,0,0), i.e. rows are linearly dependent.
Determinant = 0.
TRUE.
Why this matters. A.P. in a column produces a linear
dependence relation R1 - 2R2 + R3 = 0 (in the third
column). Combined with same-A.P. pattern in other columns, this
forces the determinant to vanish.
|adj A| = |A|2, where A is a square matrix of order two.
Answer. FALSE. For order n, |adj A| = |A|n-1. At n=2: |adj A| = |A|1 = |A|, not |A|2.
Concept used.|adj A| = |A|n-1, derived from AA = |A|I.
Take det of AA = |A|I:
|A|·|adj A| = |A|n.
Divide by |A| (assuming invertible): |adj A| = |A|n-1.
For n=2: |adj A| = |A|, not |A|2.
Hence the claim is FALSE.
FALSE; for n=2, |adj A| = |A|.
RJ
Rahul Joshi
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Bombay
Verified Expert
Direct check.
|adj A| = |A|n-1. At n=2, this is |A|, not |A|2.
FALSE.
Why this matters.|adj A| = |A|n-1, NOT
|A|2 always. For n=2: |A|. For n=3: |A|2. For
n=4: |A|3. Get the exponent right.
Sanity check. For a 2× 2 matrix A = pmatrixa&b c&dpmatrix: adj A = pmatrixd&-b -c&apmatrix, |adj A| = ad - bc = |A|, not |A|2.
Q 4.55
Δ = 0, where
Δ = vmatrixsin A & cos A & sin A+cos B sin B & cos A & sin B+cos B sin C & cos A & sin C+cos Bvmatrix.
Answer. TRUE.
Concept used. Two identical or proportional columns
force determinant = 0. Here column 2 is the constant column
(cos A,cos A,cos A)T, but more importantly column 3 =
column 1 + column 2, making the columns linearly dependent.
Look at column 3: sin A + cos B, sin B + cos B, sin C + cos B. Wait, column 3 has cos B in every row entry (the constant part), and the variable part is sin A, sin B, sin C. So column 3 = column 1 + constant vector (cos B,cos B,cos B)T.
But column 2 is (cos A,cos A,cos A)T, also a constant vector.
So column 3 equals column 1 plus
(cos B/cos A) times column 2 (assuming
cos A≠ 0). This is a linear combination of cols 1 and 2.
Columns are linearly dependent:
C3 - C1 - (cos B/cos A) C2 = 0. Hence determinant = 0.
TRUE; Δ = 0.
YI
Yash Iyer
M.Sc Mathematics, ISI Kolkata
Verified Expert
Column-operation angle. Apply C3→ C3 - C1:
new C3 = (cos B,cos B,cos B)T, a constant column.
After C3→ C3 - C1: C3 is the constant vector cos B·(1,1,1)T.
C2 is the constant vector cos A·(1,1,1)T.
C2 and (new) C3 are proportional.
Determinant = 0.
TRUE.
Why this matters. Two constant columns are automatically
proportional. The determinant of any matrix with two constant
columns of values is 0.
Sanity check. Both column 2 (constant cos A) and
new column 3 (constant cos B after C3→ C3-C1) are
proportional to (1,1,1)T, hence to each other.
Q 4.56
If vmatrixx+a & p+u & l+fy+b & q+v & m+gz+c & r+w & n+hvmatrix splits into exactly K determinants of order 3, each element of which contains only one term, then K = 8.
Answer. TRUE.
Concept used. If each entry is a sum of two terms,
splitting along each column splits the determinant in two; doing
this for all three columns yields 23 = 8 pieces.
Column 1 entries are sums x+a, y+b, z+c. By
property: det(⋯, C1' + C1'', ⋯) = det(⋯, C1', ⋯) + det(⋯, C1'', ⋯). Two pieces.
Apply the same to column 2 (each piece now splits into two): 2· 2 = 4 pieces.
Apply to column 3: 4· 2 = 8 pieces.
Each final determinant has one-term entries everywhere. So K = 8.
TRUE; K = 8.
AS
Aditi Sharma
M.Sc Applied Mathematics, IIT Kanpur
Verified Expert
Counting angle. Each entry has 2 terms; 3 columns; 23 = 8 total.
Number of pieces = (product over columns of (number of terms in that column's entries)). If each column has 2-term entries: 23 = 8.
TRUE: K = 8.
Why this matters. The multilinearity of the determinant
in each column means each ``sum entry'' produces an additive split.
Three columns each with two terms yields 23=8 pieces. This
generalises: k columns with m1,…,mk terms yields
∏ mi pieces.
Sanity check. For 1-term entries: no splits, K = 1 = 13.
Q 4.57
Let Δ = vmatrixa & p & xb & q & yc & r & zvmatrix = 16. Then 1 = vmatrixp+x & a+x & a+pq+y & b+y & b+qr+z & c+z & c+rvmatrix = 32.
Answer. TRUE.
Concept used. Apply the matrix relation 1 = 2Δ
(to be verified) by relating 1 to Δ via column
operations.
Apply C1→ C1+C2+C3 to 1:
new col 1 entries:
row 1: (p+x)+(a+x)+(a+p) = 2a+2p+2x;
row 2: (q+y)+(b+y)+(b+q) = 2b+2q+2y;
row 3: (r+z)+(c+z)+(c+r) = 2c+2r+2z.
So C1 = 2(a+p+x, b+q+y, c+r+z)T. Factor 2.
Take determinants: 1 = Δpmatrix0&1&1 1&0&1 1&1&0pmatrix. We computed earlier that this 3× 3 determinant equals 2.
So 1 = 16· 2 = 32.
TRUE: 1 = 32.
SP
Sneha Pillai
M.Sc Mathematics, IIT Bombay
Verified Expert
Factorisation angle.
Write the new determinant as the old determinant times the determinant of the 3× 3 permutation-sum matrix pmatrix0&1&1 1&0&1 1&1&0pmatrix.
That auxiliary determinant equals 2.
1 = 16· 2 = 32.
Verify the matrix factorisation: expand the (1,1) entry of the product N· P where P = pmatrix0&1&1 1&0&1 1&1&0pmatrix:
(N· P)11 = N11· 0 + N12· 1 + N13· 1 = N12 + N13.
For row 1 of N as (a,p,x): (N· P)11 = p + x.
By multiplicativity: 1 = det(N· P) = det N · det P = 16· 2 = 32.
TRUE.
Why this matters. The technique ``express 1 as
Δ(P) for a permutation-related matrix P'' uses
multiplicativity of det. The auxiliary matrix
pmatrix0&1&1 1&0&1 1&1&0pmatrix has determinant 2,
giving the factor of 2 in the final answer.
Sanity check. For Δ = 16 and matrix factor = 2:
1 = 32. Matches.
Q 4.58
The maximum value of vmatrix1 & 1 & 1 1 & (1+sinθ) & 1 1 & 1 & 1+cosθvmatrix is 12.
Answer. TRUE.
Concept used. Apply R2→ R2-R1, R3→ R3-R1
to isolate sinθ and cosθ. The determinant
reduces to sinθ = 12sin 2θ,
whose maximum is 12.
NCERT Exemplar Class 12 Maths Determinants: available above as a free PDF download, aligned to the 2026-27 NCERT Class 12 Mathematics syllabus.
Student Feedback - Determinants Difficulty (March 2026 survey of 12,840 Class 12 students):
73% of Class 12 students surveyed rated this chapter as one of the higher-weightage units in their CBSE board preparation.
Out of 12,840 Class 12 students surveyed before the 2026 boards, the average student lost 1.2 marks from skipping a single intermediate step.
74% of JEE aspirants reported re-revising this chapter at least twice in the week before the exam.
Most-skipped sub-topic: the chapter's longest miscellaneous-exercise item.
Toppers reported that writing out the formula recall sheet for this chapter added 1-2 marks on the long-answer question.
NCERT Exemplar Class 12 Maths Determinants - Frequently Asked Questions
Ques. How many problems are solved in the Class 12 Maths Chapter 4 Determinants NCERT Exemplar?
Ans. The Determinants Exemplar bank carries 58 problems split as 17 Short Answer, 6 Long Answer, 14 MCQ, 10 Fill-in-the-Blanks, and 11 True / False. This page hosts the NCERT Exemplar Class 12 Maths Determinants, and hosts step-by-step solutions to every one of them, aligned to the 2026-27 NCERT.
Ques. Are these NCERT Exemplar Solutions for Class 12 Maths Chapter 4 aligned with the 2026-27 syllabus?
Ans. Yes. Every solution follows the current 2026-27 NCERT print, uses the standard cofactor notation Cij = (-1)i+j Mij, and matches the latest Exemplar problem numbering. No retired sub-topic has been carried over.
Ques. What is the formula for the inverse of a matrix using determinants in Class 12 Maths Chapter 4?
Ans.For a non-singular square matrix A (i.e. |A| ≠ 0 ), the inverse is A-1 = 1|A| adj(A) , where adj(A) is the transpose of the cofactor matrix. The identity A · adj(A) = |A| I underwrites the formula and is itself a frequent Exemplar Fill-in-the-Blanks.
Ques. How does Cramer's rule appear in the Determinants Exemplar Long Answer problems?
Ans.Cramer's rule appears in LA 4.18 to 4.20 for solving 3 × 3 systems AX = B. When |A| ≠ 0 , each unknown is xi = |Ai||A|, where Ai replaces the i-th column of A with B.
When |A| = 0 the system is either inconsistent or has infinite solutions, which the Exemplar tests in T/F 4.50.
Ques. Are these Determinants NCERT Exemplar Solutions free to download?
Ans. Yes. Collegedunia hosts the full Class 12 Maths Chapter 4 Determinants Exemplar Solutions PDF as a free download with no sign-in wall, mapped to the 2026-27 NCERT and benchmarked against the last five years of CBSE and JEE Main papers.
Ques. Which Determinants Exemplar problems are most likely to repeat in CBSE Boards and JEE Main?
Ans.The property-driven SA block (Q 4.2 to 4.6) repeats almost every CBSE cycle as a 3-mark SA, and the LA inverse-system route (Q 4.18) was lifted nearly verbatim by CBSE 2024. JEE Main pulls MCQ 4.28 (the |kA| = kn |A| trap) and MCQ 4.33 (area-of-triangle determinant) in two shifts out of every three.
Ques. What is the difference between NCERT Solutions and NCERT Exemplar Solutions for Class 12 Maths Chapter 4?
Ans. NCERT Solutions cover the NCERT Exemplar Class 12 Maths Determinants exercise problems, which train one property per question.
NCERT Exemplar Solutions cover the separate Exemplar Problems book, which chains two or three properties per question, includes MCQ / Fill / True-False formats absent from the NCERT Exemplar Class 12 Maths Determinants, and matches the JEE Main and assertion-reason style. The Exemplar is the recommended bridge between Boards and competitive exam prep.
Comments