What Students Say
Likes
- Placements and Exposure:The college gad an imoressive placement record with top recruiters.
- Campus facilities: The campus was well maintained with modern classrooms,labs and well stocked library.
- Engaging campus life: The events,festivals and clubs kept the campus vibrant.
Dislikes
- Outdated curriculum:The course curriculum ,while generally useful needed updating in terms of industrylatest trends.
- Mess food quality:The quality of food in the hostel mess could have been better.
- Fee Increases:There were slight increases in tuition fees over the years.
Course Curriculum Overview
The specific aspects of the curriculum that influenced my decison to choose B.tech in CSE at CU were the inclusion of DSA and a focus on practical learning through projects and lab works.The curriculu
Internships Opportunities
The university had good connections with companies to provide internship opportunities,mailny in the 6th semester. 1.Infosys 2.IBM 3.TCS 4.Amazon Projects: 1.DBMS 2.E-commerce website 3.AWS deployment projects
Placement Experience
Students become eligible for campus placemnts starting fron the 6th semester.This early exposure helps studnets prepare for the interviews and understand the job market. Top companies visitied are:Microsoft
Fees and Financial Aid
During my time at Chandigarh University,the yearly fee structure for the B.tech was as follows: Year 2021: Tutuion fees:160000 Registration fees:10000 one time Lab fees:10,000 Year 2022: Tuition fees:160000
Campus Life
Festivals and Events:CU hosted several annual and technical events,which were highlight of campus lufe. Library and learniung resources :The library had broad collection of books and journals. Classroom Facilites:The classrooms were equipped with modern technolgies.
Admission
I applied at Thapar Institute of Engineering and technology and Chitkara University.I got admissions at Chandigarh University and Chitkara University,but i Choose CU. because: 1.Placements. 2.Affordablee
Faculty
the faculty-to-student ratio was around 1:25 which allowed for decent interaction between students and teachers.Most faculty members were approachable and supportive during project work and was posit.
Comments