At An Enormous Research Cost A Leading Chemical Company Has Developed GMAT Critical Reasoning

Question: At an enormous research cost, a leading chemical company has developed a manufacturing process for converting wood fibers into a plastic. According to the company, this new plastic can be used for, among other things, the hulls of small sailboats. But what does the company think sailboat hulls used to be made of? Surely the mania for high technology can scarcely go further than this.

The author’s opinion of the manufacturing process described in the passage is based primarily on the fact that

(A) plastic is unlikely to be durable enough for high-quality sailboat hulls
(B) the research costs of developing the process outweigh any savings possible from the use of the plastic
(C) a small sailboat is not normally regarded as a high-tech product
(D) hulls for small sailboats can be made from wood without converting it into plastic
(E) many other spheres of human activity are in far greater need of technological research

“At an enormous research cost, a leading chemical company has developed”- is a GMAT critical reasoning topic. This GMAT critical consists of five options and the candidates had to choose the correct option. GMAT critical reasoning helps to enhance the analytical and logical skills of the candidates. The candidate needs to get a shred of evidence that would weaken the argument or the candidate can find logical flaws in the argument. Candidates get 65 minutes to answer 36 MCQ questions in the critical reasoning section of the GMAT.

Answer: (D)
Explanation
:
We want to intensify the chasm in that causal relationship. A detailed explanation is given in five ways in order to weaken a causal relationship in the lesson books and PowerScore Bibles. Find a different cause. Demonstrate that the cause has no effect when it happens. Demonstrate that the effect has no effect when it happens. Demonstrate that the relationship is reversible, or that there is a statistical issue with the data. In order to strengthen a causal relationship, we want to do the exact opposite. That is to rule out a competing cause, demonstrate that the cause occurs when the effect does, demonstrate that the effect occurs when the cause occurs. Also eliminate the possibility that the relationship is reversible, or strengthen the data. In such a case, our Pre-Phrase looks to find an answer option that meets one of those five criteria. For instance, there is a response option that eliminates a potential secondary cause that might read: “the leading chemical company has developed a manufacturing process for converting wood fibres into a plastic that can be used to build hulls for small sailboats without transforming it into plastic”.

Option (A): Incorrect
This statement does not support the argument. The statement makes the argument much more distinct than the significance of the stimulus.

Option (B): Irrelevant
The discussion of the option is about the cost and profits that do not match the argument.

Option (C): Irrelevant
The passage depicts the use of plastic made from wood in sailboat hulls. It does not discuss the sailboat itself.

Option (D): Correct
This discussion of the option goes with the argument since it is compatible with our pre-thinking.

Option (E): Out of Scope
This option depicts the need for technological research that is irrelevant to the argument of the passage.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

Comments


No Comments To Show