Reading Passage Question
A 1973 Supreme Court decision and related Senate hearings focused congressional criticism on the 1966 Freedom of Information Act. Its unconditional exemption of any material stamped “classified”—i.e., containing information considered relevant to national security—forced the Court to uphold nondisclosure in EPA v. Mink. Justice Potter Stewart explained that the Act provided “no means to question a decision to stamp a document ‘secret.’” Senate witnesses testified that the wording of certain articles in the Act permitted bureaucrats to discourage requests for newsworthy documents.
In response, a House committee drafted HR 12471, proposing several amendments to the Act. A provision was reworded to ensure release of documents to any applicant providing a “reasonable description”—exact titles and numbers were no longer to be mandatory. The courts were empowered to review classified documents and rule on their status. The Senate companion bill, S 2543, included these provisions as well as others: standardization of search and copy fees, sanctions against noncompliant federal employees, and a provision for nonexempt portions of a classified document to be released.
The Justice and Defense departments objected to the changes as “costly, burdensome, and inflexible.” They argued that the time limits imposed on response “might actually hamper access to information.” The Pentagon asserted that judicial review of exemptions could pose a threat to national security. President Ford, upon taking office in August 1974, concurred.
HR 12471 passed in March 1974; S 2543 was approved in May after the adoption of further amendments to reduce the number of unconditional exemptions granted in 1966. The Hart Amendment, for instance, mandated disclosure of law enforcement records, unless their release would interfere with a trial or investigation, invade personal privacy, or disclose an informer’s identity. This amendment provoked another presidential objection: millions of pages of FBI records would be subject to public scrutiny, unless each individual section were proven exempt.
Before submitting the legislation to Ford, a joint conference of both houses amalgamated the two versions of the bill, while making further changes to incorporate Ford’s criticisms. The administration of disciplinary sanctions was transferred from the courts to the executive branch; provisions were included to accord due weight to departmental expertise in the evaluation of “classified” exemptions. The identity of confidential sources was in all cases to be protected. Ford nevertheless vetoed the bill, but the veto was overridden by a two-thirds vote in both houses.
“A 1973 Supreme Court decision and related Senate hearings focused congressional criticism”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 3 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
- According to the passage, the Justice and Defense departments opposed the proposed revision of the Freedom of Information Act on the grounds that it
A) was an attempt to block public access to information.
B) would violate national security agreements.
C) would pose administrative problems.
D) was an attempt to curtail their own departmental power.
E) would weaken the president’s authority.
Answer: C
Explanation: According to the third paragraph, the Justice and Defense departments disapproved of the amendment because it was "costly, burdensome, and inflexible." In other words, they were against revision for administrative reasons. The Justice and Defense departments claimed that the revisions “might actually hamper access to information” according to the lines. However, they stopped short of claiming that the revision was an effort to restrict the public's access to information. The answer is (C).
- Which of the following statements, if true, supports the assertion that “judicial review of exemptions could pose a threat to national security” (Highlighted)?
A) Judges lack the expertise to evaluate the significance of military intelligence records.
B) Many of the documents that are presently stamped “classified” contain information that is inaccurate or outdated.
C) It would be time-consuming and expensive for judges to review millions of pages of classified records.
D) Some judges are likely to rule on exemptions in accordance with vested interests of political action groups.
E) The practice of judicial review of exemptions will succeed only if it meets with presidential approval.
Answer: A
Explanation: The Pentagon doesn't provide much evidence to support its claim that judicial review would compromise national security. The president reportedly concurred, but we don't know why. Judges who lack the required knowledge might disclose information that endangers national security.
- Which of the following statements is in accordance with President Ford’s position on disclosure of FBI records?
A) FBI records should be exempt from the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.
B) FBI records should only be withheld from release if such release constitutes a threat to national security.
C) It would be too expensive and time-consuming to identify exempt sections of FBI records.
D) Protection of the identity of confidential sources is more important than the protection of personal privacy or investigative secrecy.
E) FBI records should not be reviewed section by section before being released to the public.
Answer: A
Explanation: According to the paragraph, Ford was against making FBI documents public. He didn't want them exposed to the public. The 180 possible answers, (B) and (E), inadvertently imply that Ford was amenable to the notion of a release of FBI documents. (C) is false. We may conclude from the lines that Ford thought there were obstacles to the exemption of certain FBI documents, but we can't presume that one of these obstacles was cost. There is no indication in the passage that Ford thought maintaining the confidentiality of sources was more crucial than maintaining individual privacy or investigative secrecy (D). We can discover that all three are protected by the Hart amendment in paragraph 4, but no differentiation is made like in (D). The answer is (A).
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
- A supernova is a brief stellar explosion so luminous that it can briefly outshine an entire galaxy GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The largest part of the brain, which is what you actually see when you look at a brain from above or the side GMAT Reading Comprehension
- James Joyce revolutionized the novel, the short story, and modern literature as we know it. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Proverbial wisdom states that “birds of a feather flock together. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- VO2 max is more than merely a trendy buzzword for workout aficionados to bandy about GMAT Reading Comprehension
- What does laughter mean? GMAT Reading Comprehension
- According To Legend, Aesculapius Bore Two Daughters, Panacea and Hyegeia GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Although I am Familiar With Rembrandt's Work, Through Photographs GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Given His Luminous Treatment Of Light, Sky, and Water, J.M.W. Turner GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Vienna Circle, An Association of Philosophers Gathered Around GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In 1996, the State of Arizona Introduced a Statute GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Majority of White Abolitionists and the Majority of Suffragists GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Although Online Travel Sites have made the Local Travel Agent Obsolete GMAT Sentence Correction
- After Examining the Recently Released Department of Labor Data GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Boccaccio‘s Donnée Is Of An Upper-Class Milieu GMAT Reading Comprehension
- As to When the First People Populated the American Subcontinent GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Jacob Burckhardt’s View that Renaissance European Women Stood on GMAT Reading Comprehension
- I Want To Criticize The Social System, And To Show It At Work GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In 1905, The Supreme Court Of The United States Decided On The Case GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Dynamic Growth Of The People’s Republic Of China In Recent Years GMAT Reading Comprehension


-modified.png?h=56&w=56&mode=stretch)





Comments