There is No Complete Life of Alexandre Dumas.

Reading Passage Question

There is no complete life of Alexandre Dumas. The age has not produced the intellectual athlete who can gird himself up for that labor. One of the worst books that ever was written, if it can be said to be written, is, I think, the English attempt at a biography of Dumas. Style, grammar, taste, feeling, are all bad. The author does not so much write a life as draw up an indictment. The spirit of his work is grudging, sneering, contemptuous, and pitifully peddling. The great charge is that Dumas was a humbug, that he was not the author of his own books, that his books were written by "collaborators"--above all, by M. Maquet

There is no doubt that Dumas had a regular system of collaboration, which he never concealed. But whereas Dumas could turn out books that _live_, whoever his assistants were, could any of his assistants write books that live, without Dumas? He once asked his son to help him; the younger Alexander declined. "It is worth a thousand a year, and you have only to make objections," the sire urged; but the son was not to be tempted. Some excellent novelists of to-day would be much better if they employed a friend to make objections. But, as a rule, the collaborator did much more. Dumas' method, apparently, was first to talk the subject over with his _aide-de-camp_. This is an excellent practice, as ideas are knocked out, like sparks (an elderly illustration!), by the contact of minds. Then the young man probably made researches, put a rough sketch on paper, and supplied Dumas, as it were, with his "brief." Then Dumas took the "brief" and wrote the novel. He gave it life, he gave it the spark (_l'etincelle_); and the story lived and moved

“There is no complete life of Alexandre Dumas.” - is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 4 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. The main point of the passage is to
  1. deprecate Dumas and his collaborators
  2. to extol that Dumas was a touch artist in writing live-wire novels
  3. to prove the futility of having critics by writers to illustrate that egoism of great writers such as Dumas
  4. to describe the reverence The English literates had for French Literature
  5.  to bring to light the dubiousness of English writers

Answer: B
Explanation: The passage states that Dumus used to write all his books with collaboration. However, he could make the book live. He had that capability. His practise made him an excellent live wire novels but that was with collaboration with other writers. Hence, the passage means that Dumas was a touch artist in writing live wire novels. B is the correct answer.

  1. Which of the following statements would the author of the passage not agree with except?
  1. Dumas exploited youth to gain fame
  2. The English authors were chivalrous when discussing foreign litterateurs
  3. The English biography of Dumas is a masterpiece
  4. Dumas could animate and enliven any theme from small spurts of overviews.
  5. Dumas was a plagiarist and a copycat

Answer: D
Explanation: The author also states that Dumas was bad with grammar and writing. The second paragraph of the passage states that Dumas could bring any theme to life. This was the one thing that the author agrees with. The same is states in the option D, making it the correct answer.

  1. What can be inferred from the last line of the passage considering the sentiments expressed in text?
  1. Dumas was a dull-wit who depended upon his subordinates for developing a novel
  2. His stories lacked life
  3. That the author is a hard-core champion of Dumas
  4. The finale and finesse created by Dumas were unlively
  5. The author was equivocal on Dumas’s performance as a fictioneer

Answer: C
Explanation: In the last line of the passage, the author expresses the excellence of Dumas. He says “ Dumas took the "brief" and wrote the novel”. The author also praises Dumas for his excellence. All the option except C seems fit. Since the author was praising Dumas, he can be considered hardcore champion of Dumas.

  1. Which of the following expressions does the author of the text not allude to regarding the biography of Dumas written by an English author?
  1. His style
  2. The English author’s focus in his presentation
  3. The English author’s glorification of Dumas
  4. The English author’s envy and derision for Dumas
  5. The observations of the author of the text about the English biography of Dumas

Answer: C
Explanation: We need an answer that does not touch upon some point. The option C states that the author glorifies Dumas. This is not talked about in the passage. Hence, this is the correct choice.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions

Comments


No Comments To Show