Reading Passage Question
Legal cases can be termed “hard” cases if they raise issues that are highly controversial, issues about which people with legal training disagree. The ongoing debate over the completeness of the law usually concerns the extent to which such hard cases are legally determinate, or decidable according to existing law. H. L. A. Hart’s The Concept of Law is still the clearest and most persuasive statement of both the standard theory of hard cases and the standard theory of law on which it rests. For Hart, the law consists of legal rules formulated in general terms; these terms he calls “open textured,” which means that they contain a “core” of settled meaning and a “penumbra” or “periphery” where their meaning is not determinate. For example, suppose an ordinance prohibits the use of vehicles in a park.
“Vehicle” has a core of meaning which includes cars and motorcycles. But, Hart claims, other vehicles, such as bicycles, fall within the peripheral meaning of “vehicle,” so that the law does not establish whether they are prohibited. There will always be cases not covered by the core meaning of legal terms within existing laws; Hart considers these cases to be legally indeterminate. Since courts cannot decide such cases on legal grounds, they must consider nonlegal (for example, moral and political) grounds, and thereby exercise judicial discretion to make, rather than apply, law.
In Ronald Dworkin’s view the law is richer than Hart would grant; he denies that the law consists solely of explicit rules. The law also includes principles that do not depend for their legal status on any prior official recognition or enactment. Dworkin claims that many cases illustrate the existence of legal principles that are different from legal rules and that Hart’s “model of rules” cannot accommodate. For Dworkin, legal rules apply in an all-or-nothing fashion, whereas legal principles do not: they provide the rationale for applying legal rules. Thus, because Dworkin thinks there is law in addition to legal rules, he thinks that legal indeterminacy and the need for judicial discretion do not follow from the existence of open texture in legal rules.
It would be a mistake, though, to dispute Hart’s theory of hard cases on this basis alone. If Hart’s claim about the “open texture” of general terms is true, then we should expect to find legal indeterminacies even if the law consists of principles in addition to rules. Legal principles, as well as legal rules, contain general terms that have open texture. And it would be absurd to suppose that wherever the meaning of a legal rule is unclear, there is a legal principle with a clear meaning.Most interesting and controversial cases will occur in the penumbra of both rules and principles.
“Legal cases can be termed “hard” cases if they raise issues that are highly controversial.”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 5 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analysing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
- Which one of the following best expresses the main idea of the passage?
(A) The law will never be complete because new situations will always arise which will require new laws to resolve them.
(B) The most difficult legal cases are those concerning controversial issues about which trained legal minds have differing opinions.
(C) The concept of legal principles does not diminish the usefulness of the concept of the open texture of general terms in deciding whether hard cases are legally determinate.
(D) The concept of legal principles is a deleterious addition to the theory of law since any flaws exhibited by legal rules could also be shared by legal principles.
(E) The inherent inconsistency of terms used in laws provides a continuing opportunity for judges to exercise their discretion to correct defects and gaps in the law.
Answer: C
Explanation: This option is correct. In this passage, the author describes Hart's point of view. It defines legal rules as open texture, that is rules that sometimes have a clear meaning and sometimes they don't. The main focus of the passage is on supporting Hart's view, refuting Dworkins'view. So, Option C is correct.
- According to the passage, the term “legal principles” as used by Dworkin refers to
(A) a comprehensive code of ethics that governs the behavior of professionals in the legal system
(B) explicit analyses of the terms used in legal rules, indicating what meanings the terms do and do not cover
(C) legal doctrines that underlie and guide the use of accepted legal rules
(D) legal rules that have not yet passed through the entire legislative procedure necessary for them to become law
(E) the body of legal decisions regarding cases that required judicial discretion for their resolution
Answer: C
Explanation: This option is correct. According to the passage, for Dworkin, legal rules apply in an all-or-nothing fashion, whereas legal principles do not: they provide the rationale for applying legal rules. So, Option C is correct.
- Which one of the following expresses a view that the author of the passage would most probably hold concerning legal principles and legal rules?
(A) Legal rules are applied more often than legal principles when a case involves issues about which legal professionals disagree.
(B) Both legal rules and legal principles areofficially recognized as valid parts of the law.
(C) Hart’s “model of rules” has been superseded by a “model of principles” that sheds light on legal determinacy.
(D) Legal principles are just as likely as legal rules to have terms that have both core and peripheral meanings.
(E) Legal principles eliminate the need for judicial discretion in resolving the problemsgenerated by the open texture of legal rules.
Answer: D
Explanation: This option is correct. As per the statement in the last paragraph, we can conclude that the author thinks. Both entities are biased and both have core settled meanings and penumbras. So, Option D is correct.
- It can be inferred that the author of the passage regards Hart’s theory of hard cases and the theory of standard law as
(A) exhaustive
(B) worthy of respect
(C) interesting but impractical
(D) plausible but unwieldy
(E) hopelessly outmoded
Answer: B
Explanation: This option is correct. As per the author, H. L. A. Hart’s The Concept of Law is still the clearest. Most persuasive statement of both the standard theory of hard cases and the standard theory of law on which it rests. So, Option B is correct.
- In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) outlining the problems that might be faced by a legislature attempting to create a complete body of law that would prevent judges from making rather than applying the law
(B) justifying the idea that “hard” cases will always exist in the practice of law, no matter what laws are written or how they are applied
(C) presenting evidence to support Dworkin’s idea that legal rules apply in an all-or-nothing fashion, whereas legal principles apply in more sophisticated ways
(D) critiquing the concept of the open texture of legal terms as a conceptual flaw in Hart’s otherwise well-regarded book
(E) demonstrating that Dworkin’s concept of legal principles does not form the basis for a successful attack on Hart’
Answer: E
Explanation: This option is correct. As we can infer from the passage, the author is simply trying to claim that legal principles cannot undermine Hart's theory. So, the the author is primarily concerned with demonstrating that Dworkin’s concept of legal principles does not form the basis for a successful attack on Hart’. Option E is correct.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- Contamination is the Unintended Presence of Harmful Substances
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- The 1956 Short Film The Red Balloon Ends with the Young Protagonist Sailing Over Paris
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- The Diversity of Species in Bacterial Communities is Often Studied by Phenotypic Characterization
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- Despite views that globalization has reached its peak
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- Five years after the crash in technology shares
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- In the seventeenth-century Florentine textile industry women were employed
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- To remain financially sound, health insurance companies must charge
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- Dark matter and dark energy have both been postulated by astrophysicists
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- The existence of mammals on the earth can be traced back to at least the Triassic time
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- The nub of the restorationist critique of environmental preservationism
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- Many of the most popular diets today, including the so-called “Paleo diet,”
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- Should the soft spring breath of kindly appreciation warm
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- In Manhattan, The Beauty of The Night Sky is Only a Faded Metaphor
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- The Advanced Access Content System (AACS) is a copy protection technology
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- One of the first attempts to peer into the living human brain
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- Nitrogen, Which Comprises 78 Percent of Earth's Atmosphere
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- An Experiment Conducted Aboard Space Lab in 1983
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- The Parthenon has Long been Regarded as One of the Great Architectural
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- Geologists Harris and Gass Hypothesized that the Red Sea Rift Developed
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- Generally, Interspecific Matings Represent an Evolutionary Dead End, Producing Sterile Offspring


-modified.png?h=56&w=56&mode=stretch)





Comments