Reducing Atmospheric CO2 by a Deliberate Carbon Dioxide Removal

Reading Passage Question

Reducing atmospheric CO2 by a deliberate carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategy is one option being considered for combating global warming caused by the current high levels of atmospheric CO2. Before implementation can occur, it is important to have a reference goal for a planned reduction of the global CO2 concentration against which any specific strategy can be assessed. Scientists agree that a modest aim would be to seek to reduce the CO2 concentration by 50 ppm, which is the equivalent of removing 400 gigatons of CO2,or an average of 4 GtCO2/yr over 100 years. At this substantial level of reduction, it is still expected that dangerous levels of atmospheric CO2 would persist.

Even in the limiting case in which all emissions of CO2 cease, it is not straightforward to estimate how much CO2 must be removed from the atmosphere to lower its content by 4 GtCO2 annually. During any period of zero emissions but no CDR implementation, the atmospheric CO2 concentration will fall. Ocean currents continually bring deep ocean water to the surface that was last at the surface hundreds of years before, when the atmospheric CO2 concentration was at its preindustrial value. As equilibrium is established at the ocean surface between CO2 in the air and dissolved in the ocean, such ocean water scavenges CO2 from the atmosphere. So, with a time scale of hundreds of years, some atmospheric CO2 reduction is done naturally (at the expense of growing acidity in the ocean).

The same requirement for equilibrium at the ocean surface governs the reverse effect that would happen if the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere were lowered someday by deliberate removal of CO2. There would be an immediate compensating transfer of CO2 from the ocean to the atmosphere, as a result of which it would be necessary to remove more than one unit of CO2 from the atmosphere to reduce the atmospheric CO2 content by one unit. Forest responses add complications, as do deep ocean currents. Today, the combined effect of ocean and land CO2 “sinks” results, for a time-scale measured in decades, in roughly half of the CO2 remaining in the atmosphere that was emitted to the atmosphere by the burning of fossil fuel, but the future magnitudes of these sinks are uncertain.

‘Reducing atmospheric CO2 by a deliberate carbon dioxide removal’ is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 4 comprehension questions.

The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. Which of the following is listed as a natural phenomenon that would require a CDR strategy to remove CO2 by an amount greater than its desired CO2 reduction target?

A) the presence of land CO2 “sinks”
B) the presence of ocean CO2 “sinks”
C) equilibrium at the ocean surface
D) deep ocean water moving to the surface
E) scavenging of CO2 by the ocean surface

Answer: C
Explanation:
Option C is Correct. If the CDR reduces CO2 then because of the equilibrium of the oceans, they will release more CO2.

  1.  The author discusses ocean and land CO2 “sinks” in order to:

A) explain how much of the CO2 emitted by the burning of fossil fuels remains in the atmosphere
B) highlight how uncertain the future is regarding the magnitude of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels
C) highlight the challenges in determining natural effects on CO2 levels when implementing a CDR strategy
D) clarify why it would be necessary to remove more than one unit of CO2 from the atmosphere to reduce the atmospheric CO2 content by one unit
E) emphasize that there are many natural means by which CO2 is removed from the atmosphere.

Answer: C
Explanation:
In the 3rd paragraph it mentioned all kinds of challenges which would be faced when implementing CDR strategy. The ocean's equilibrium, the forests, and also the combined effects of land and ocean sinks.

  1. The author uses the content in the parentheses at the end of the 2nd paragraph to:

A) provide additional information about how the natural process of atmospheric CO2 reduction occurs
B) emphasize the importance of a negative effect that would result from a natural process
C) highlight one result from the many natural processes related to CO2 removal
D) present a negative effect that is not directly related to the primary purpose of the paragraph
E) show the importance of the natural removal of CO2 in the atmosphere

Answer: D
Explanation:
Correct. It is just an additional piece of information unrelated to the passage. It has no relevance to the content of the passage hence it has been put inside parentheses.

  1. All of the following are discussed in the passage EXCEPT:

A) details on how CO2 will be removed from the atmosphere by a CDR strategy
B) difficulties in measuring the effects of a CDR strategy on CO2 reduction
C) increases in atmospheric CO2 levels resulting from natural processes
D) decreases in atmospheric CO2 result resulting from natural processes
E) the risk of high atmospheric levels of CO2 in the atmosphere

Answer: A
Explanation:
A is the correct answer. There has been mention of the CDR strategy in the passage multiple times but the details on how CO2 will be removed have not been discussed.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions

Comments


No Comments To Show