How Does The Resistance Of Wire Depends On Its Radius?

The resistance of a wire is inversely proportional to the cross-sectional area of a wire whereas, the cross-sectional area of a wire is directly proportional to the square of the radius of the wire.

Therefore, the resistance and the radius of the wire are inversely proportional to each other.

Therefore, as the radius increases, the resistance of the wire decreases. Therefore, the resistance of a wire depends on its radius.

Read More: Ohm’s law

Related Questions

Read More:

Ohm’s Law – Important Topics
Electric Dipole	Difference between AC and DC	Internal resistance formula
Wheatstone Bridge	Differences Between Acceleration and Velocity	Combination of Resistors
Potentiometer	Cells, emf, Internal Resistance	Current Density
Static Electricity	Relation between power and resistance	Resistor Colour Codes
Ampere	Resistivity Temperature Dependence	Permittivity And Permeability
The connection between kva and kw	Resistance Formula	Difference between kva and kw
Meter Bridge	Difference between RTD and thermocouple	Electromotive Force
Ohm’s Law and its Limitations	Relation between resistance and length	Unit of Specific Resistance
Types of Current	Current Electricity	Types of Resistors
Uses of Resistor	Difference Between Primary Cell and Secondary Cell	Electrical Formula
Drift Velocity	Unit of Current	Power Of Alternating Current
Power transformers	Difference between air conditioning and refrigeration	Current density formula
Carbon Resistor	Difference between earth and neutral	Voltage divider formula
Cells in Series and in Parallel	Difference between emf and voltage	Circuit Diagram
Resistivity formula	NCERT Solutions Current Electricity	Derivation of Drift Velocity

CBSE CLASS XII Related Questions

1.
Assertion (A) : The mass of a nucleus is less than the sum of the masses of the constituent nucleons. Reason (R) : Energy is absorbed when the nucleons are bound together to form a nucleus.

Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A).
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A).
Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false.
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are false.

View Solution

2.
Two small identical metallic balls having charges \( q \) and \( -2q \) are kept far at a separation \( r \). They are brought in contact and then separated at distance \( \frac{r}{2} \). Compared to the initial force \( F \), they will now:

attract with a force \( \frac{F}{2} \)
repel with a force \( \frac{F}{2} \)
repel with a force \( F \)
attract with a force \( F \)

View Solution

3.
Does a step up transformer contradict the principle of conservation of energy? Justify your answer.

View Solution

4.
The figure shows three point charges kept at the vertices of triangle ABC. The net electric field, due to this system of charges, at the midpoint M of base BC will be:

\( \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 l^2} \) pointing along MA
\( \frac{q}{\pi \epsilon_0 l^2} \) pointing along AM
\( \frac{q}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 l^2} \) pointing along AM
Zero

View Solution

5.
If Bohr’s quantization postulate (angular momentum \( = \frac{nh}{2\pi} \)) is a basic law of nature, it should be equally valid for the case of planetary motion also. Why, then, do we never speak of quantization of orbits of planets around the Sun? Explain.

View Solution

6.
Four independent waves are expressed as \[ (i)\; y_1=A_1\sin\omega t, \] \[ (ii)\; y_2=A_2\sin 2\omega t, \] \[ (iii)\; y_3=A_3\cos\omega t, \] \[ (iv)\; y_4=A_4\sin\left(\omega t+\frac{\pi}{3}\right) \] The interference between two of these waves is possible in

(i) and (iii) only
(iii) and (iv) only
(i), (iii) and (iv) only
All of them

View Solution

How Does The Resistance Of Wire Depends On Its Radius?

Related Questions

CBSE CLASS XII Related Questions

1.
Assertion (A) : The mass of a nucleus is less than the sum of the masses of the constituent nucleons. Reason (R) : Energy is absorbed when the nucleons are bound together to form a nucleus.

2.
Two small identical metallic balls having charges \( q \) and \( -2q \) are kept far at a separation \( r \). They are brought in contact and then separated at distance \( \frac{r}{2} \). Compared to the initial force \( F \), they will now:

3.
Does a step up transformer contradict the principle of conservation of energy? Justify your answer.

4.
The figure shows three point charges kept at the vertices of triangle ABC. The net electric field, due to this system of charges, at the midpoint M of base BC will be:

5.
If Bohr’s quantization postulate (angular momentum \( = \frac{nh}{2\pi} \)) is a basic law of nature, it should be equally valid for the case of planetary motion also. Why, then, do we never speak of quantization of orbits of planets around the Sun? Explain.

6.
Four independent waves are expressed as \[ (i)\; y_1=A_1\sin\omega t, \] \[ (ii)\; y_2=A_2\sin 2\omega t, \] \[ (iii)\; y_3=A_3\cos\omega t, \] \[ (iv)\; y_4=A_4\sin\left(\omega t+\frac{\pi}{3}\right) \] The interference between two of these waves is possible in

Similar Physics Concepts

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER

How Does The Resistance Of Wire Depends On Its Radius?

Related Questions

CBSE CLASS XII Related Questions

1.Assertion (A) : The mass of a nucleus is less than the sum of the masses of the constituent nucleons. Reason (R) : Energy is absorbed when the nucleons are bound together to form a nucleus.

2.Two small identical metallic balls having charges \( q \) and \( -2q \) are kept far at a separation \( r \). They are brought in contact and then separated at distance \( \frac{r}{2} \). Compared to the initial force \( F \), they will now:

3.Does a step up transformer contradict the principle of conservation of energy? Justify your answer.

4.The figure shows three point charges kept at the vertices of triangle ABC. The net electric field, due to this system of charges, at the midpoint M of base BC will be:

5. If Bohr’s quantization postulate (angular momentum \( = \frac{nh}{2\pi} \)) is a basic law of nature, it should be equally valid for the case of planetary motion also. Why, then, do we never speak of quantization of orbits of planets around the Sun? Explain.

6.Four independent waves are expressed as \[ (i)\; y_1=A_1\sin\omega t, \] \[ (ii)\; y_2=A_2\sin 2\omega t, \] \[ (iii)\; y_3=A_3\cos\omega t, \] \[ (iv)\; y_4=A_4\sin\left(\omega t+\frac{\pi}{3}\right) \] The interference between two of these waves is possible in

Similar Physics Concepts

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER

1.
Assertion (A) : The mass of a nucleus is less than the sum of the masses of the constituent nucleons. Reason (R) : Energy is absorbed when the nucleons are bound together to form a nucleus.

2.
Two small identical metallic balls having charges \( q \) and \( -2q \) are kept far at a separation \( r \). They are brought in contact and then separated at distance \( \frac{r}{2} \). Compared to the initial force \( F \), they will now:

3.
Does a step up transformer contradict the principle of conservation of energy? Justify your answer.

4.
The figure shows three point charges kept at the vertices of triangle ABC. The net electric field, due to this system of charges, at the midpoint M of base BC will be:

5.
If Bohr’s quantization postulate (angular momentum \( = \frac{nh}{2\pi} \)) is a basic law of nature, it should be equally valid for the case of planetary motion also. Why, then, do we never speak of quantization of orbits of planets around the Sun? Explain.

6.
Four independent waves are expressed as \[ (i)\; y_1=A_1\sin\omega t, \] \[ (ii)\; y_2=A_2\sin 2\omega t, \] \[ (iii)\; y_3=A_3\cos\omega t, \] \[ (iv)\; y_4=A_4\sin\left(\omega t+\frac{\pi}{3}\right) \] The interference between two of these waves is possible in